waldo kitty ha scritto:
On 9/7/2012 05:20, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Martin wrote:
???
?
On 07/09/2012 16:54, waldo kitty wrote:
it actually decoded pretty much on google translate... it didn't make
much sense but ;)
gotta wonder what happened there...
replied to lazarus-other
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepasc
On 9/7/2012 05:20, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Martin wrote:
???
?
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:47:40PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> ???
>
> ?
>
> ??
㱨瑭氾ਠ‼桥慤㸊††㱭整愠捯湴敮琽≴數琯桴浬㬠捨慲獥琽啔䘭ㄶ䉅∊†††桴瑰ⵥ煵椀 ੶㴢䍯湴敮琭呹灥∾ਠ‼⽨敡搾ਠ‼扯摹杣潬潲㴢⍆䙆䙆䘢⁴數琽∣〰〰〰∾ਠ†‼摩瘠捬
慳猽≭潺ⵣ楴攭灲敦楸∾佮‰㘯〹⼲〱㈠ㄴ㨲〬⁌畫慳稠卯歯氊†††睲潴攺ਠ†‼⽤楶㸊††㰀 汯捫煵潴攠捩瑥㴢浩携欲愷癥㑪䁧敲浡湥牧∠瑹灥㴢捩瑥∾ਠ††‼灲攠睲慰㴢
∾卯牲礠景爠扥楮朠楮捲敡獩湧汹⁏吠慧慩渠㬩畴㨊瑨攠灯楮琠睡猬⁷桥渠慭潮朠捲潷猠⠀ ੮敷獧牯異猯浡楬楮朠汩獴猩Ⱐ捲敡欠汩步⁴桥礠摯ਨ潢敹⁴桥整楱略瑴攩Ⱐ湥癥爠浩湤⁹
潵爠扡捫杲潵湤⸊ੂ慣欠楮⁴桥慹⁹潵❤整楮欠瑯瑴瀺⼯睷眮楥瑦牧⽲晣
On 06/09/2012 11:45, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 10:35 +0100 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
>>
>> Very true, but only for this case.
>
> Exactly what I wanted to express. I thought it would be unecessary to
> explicitly tell people to adapt "their tsyle" to something appropriate
>
Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 10:35 +0100 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
>
> Very true, but only for this case.
Exactly what I wanted to express. I thought it would be unecessary to
explicitly tell people to adapt "their tsyle" to something appropriate
to the receiver(s) of the mail.
Marc
--
Marc Sant
On 06/09/2012 09:51, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> Let me add the third category:
>
> Business communications. Because that is where to[p]posting above a fully
> quoted backlog of mails comes from. And that's where this type of
> writing really makes sense.
>
[snip explanation]
Very true, but only for
Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2012, 10:51 +0200 schrieb Marc Santhoff:
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.09.2012, 15:24 +0200 schrieb Bernd:
> > 2012/9/5 Michael Schnell :
> >
> > > IMHO just quoting some words where appropriate is the only polite way to
> > > answer to a forum message
> >
> > Exactly.
> >
> > T
Am Mittwoch, den 05.09.2012, 15:24 +0200 schrieb Bernd:
> 2012/9/5 Michael Schnell :
>
> > IMHO just quoting some words where appropriate is the only polite way to
> > answer to a forum message
>
> Exactly.
>
> The main difference between a private email conversation
... [nice explanation]
Le
Am 05.09.2012 16:46, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 05/09/12 13:06, Michael Schnell wrote:
Hijacking an already hijacked thread ?!?!?!?!?
:-(
PS:
Just to make something clear. When I changed the subject line to "File
Managers compared", I had no intent to hi-jack the "Proprietary vs Open
Sourc
On 09/05/2012 04:46 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 05/09/12 13:06, Michael Schnell wrote:
Hijacking an already hijacked thread ?!?!?!?!?
:-(
PS:
Just to make something clear. When I changed the subject line to "File
Managers compared", ...
This had been a different thread :-) .
And here
On 05/09/12 13:06, Michael Schnell wrote:
Hijacking an already hijacked thread ?!?!?!?!?
:-(
PS:
Just to make something clear. When I changed the subject line to "File
Managers compared", I had no intent to hi-jack the "Proprietary vs Open
Source mentality" thread... Read that original messa
Bernd wrote:
2012/9/5 Michael Schnell :
IMHO just quoting some words where appropriate is the only polite way to
answer to a forum message
Exactly.
The main difference between a private email conversation between two
people and a thread on a forum or a mailing list is in the 1:1
conversation
2012/9/5 Michael Schnell :
> IMHO just quoting some words where appropriate is the only polite way to
> answer to a forum message
Exactly.
The main difference between a private email conversation between two
people and a thread on a forum or a mailing list is in the 1:1
conversation both parties
On 09/04/2012 02:45 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
Most of my customers mainly top post
top posting is not nice at all. I find such messages hardly readable.
IMHO just quoting some words where appropriate is the only polite way to
answer to a forum message
-Michael
--
___
Hijacking an already hijacked thread ?!?!?!?!?
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 04/09/2012 13:45, Paul Breneman wrote:
I agree!
I am glad you do. But please remind me, what are you agreeing too? I was
unable to find out from your mail.
Blind people also like top posting a lot!
I have heard that. And I (partly / see below) accept that. But:
1)
Would a single quoted l
I agree!
Most of my customers mainly top post (with the entire previous message
there just for reference). Sometimes if we need to reply to several
different sections of an email we post in context.
Blind people also like top posting a lot!
Avishai wrote:
Fortunately, the whole world does
Fortunately, the whole world doesn't march to one drum. There are other
cultures. Sorry if that annoys you.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 04/09/12 08:46, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>
>>
>>> By the way, next time you want to open a new thread, don't reply to a
>>
On 04/09/12 08:46, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
By the way, next time you want to open a new thread, don't reply to a
message in an existing thread... your message didn't appear as a new
Arg! That is no annoying!! Most people here have NO Netiquette! [1][2][3]
* Top posting
* Quoting whole mes
Am 04.09.2012 09:46, schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
On 4-9-2012 9:27, ajv wrote:
If I want to check previous list items to not duplicate a question the
lazarus archives are available.
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/
How can I search the archives?
thanks.
By the way, next t
On 4-9-2012 9:27, ajv wrote:
> If I want to check previous list items to not duplicate a question the
> lazarus archives are available.
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/
> How can I search the archives?
> thanks.
>
>
By the way, next time you want to open a new thread, don'
On 4-9-2012 9:27, ajv wrote:
> If I want to check previous list items to not duplicate a question the
> lazarus archives are available.
> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/
> How can I search the archives?
> thanks.
Try e.g. this alternative:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lazarus@
If I want to check previous list items to not duplicate a question the
lazarus archives are available.
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/
How can I search the archives?
thanks.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.free
25 matches
Mail list logo
