Re: [Lazarus] proposed GUI Testrunner updates

2015-03-16 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:03:08 + Graeme Geldenhuys mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote: [...] But how does Lazarus handle changes that might require FPC 3.1.1? Wrap it in IFDEF's? Yes. Other ideas? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] proposed GUI Testrunner updates

2015-03-16 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-03-06 18:22, Juha Manninen wrote: If the changes can logically be grouped then small paches are good, but they can be uploaded and committed at one go. I've made various changes so far, but need to split things up first because I got a bit carried away with improvements. ;-) Of the

Re: [Lazarus] proposed GUI Testrunner updates

2015-03-07 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 2015-03-06 18:22, Juha Manninen wrote: If the changes can logically be grouped then small paches are good, but they can be uploaded and committed at one go. OK thanks. I'll do that. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal

[Lazarus] proposed GUI Testrunner updates

2015-03-06 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, I've recently been using the Lazarus GUI Testrunner for work purposes and was amazed at how outdated the interface is [based on FPTest, DUnit2 or DUnitX's GUI TestRunners]. Improvements are easy to do at this point, but I have quite a few things that I want to add. The question is, how

Re: [Lazarus] proposed GUI Testrunner updates

2015-03-06 Thread Juha Manninen
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote: Improvements are easy to do at this point, but I have quite a few things that I want to add. The question is, how should I do this? Break the changes up into small patches and wait for each to be applied