[Lazarus] test

-- Leonardo M. Ramé Medical IT - Griensu S.A. Av. Colón 636 - Piso 8 Of. A X5000EPT -- Córdoba Tel.: +54(351)4246924 +54(351)4247788 +54(351)4247979 int. 19 Cel.: +54 9 (011) 40871877 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] "Test" button in project inspector

Main menu: Source -> Quick Syntax Check   Of course, you can assing some handy shortcut to it.   V. __ Od: Bo Berglund <bo.bergl...@gmail.com> Komu: <lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org> Datum: 08.02.2016 16:05 Předmě

Re: [Lazarus] "Test" button in project inspector

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:52:23 +0100, Werner Pamler wrote: >In the Project inspector window, there is a Test button. What is it good >for? Its function is not documented in the help file accessible by the >Help button at the left. What's confusing is that executing

Re: [Lazarus] "Test" button in project inspector

On 05/02/16 13:52, Werner Pamler wrote: > In the Project inspector window, there is a Test button. What is it > good for? Its function is not documented in the help file accessible > by the Help button at the left. What's confusing is that executing > "Test" reports this error in the Message

[Lazarus] "Test" button in project inspector

In the Project inspector window, there is a Test button. What is it good for? Its function is not documented in the help file accessible by the Help button at the left. What's confusing is that executing "Test" reports this error in the Message window for all of my tested projects, even for an

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On 11/06/2015 09:55 AM, Anthony Walter wrote: > To Debian based Lazarus users, if you have the inclination can you test > this out, or provide some feedback: > 40 minutes in, works great and looks pretty, needs the utilities thing fixed. If you're looking for suggestions? Scrubbing with arrow

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Good feedback. Regarding arrows keys, the window is actually a popup and as such I'm not sure it can receive input focus. I'll investigate. The cpu graph isolation suggestion is a really good idea. Thanks. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

El 06/11/15 a les 09:55, Anthony Walter ha escrit: To Debian based Lazarus users, if you have the inclination can you test this out, or provide some feedback: On kde (kubuntu 15.10) with compositing disabled the window never disappears (when I click on the checkbox it just stays there without

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On 11/06/2015 11:22 AM, Luca Olivetti wrote: > El 06/11/15 a les 09:55, Anthony Walter ha escrit: >> To Debian based Lazarus users, if you have the inclination can you test >> this out, or provide some feedback: > > On kde (kubuntu 15.10) with compositing disabled the window never > disappears

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Anthony Testing on Kubuntu 64 15.04, I can't find it on the KDE menu, but running from the command line works. The utility looks good and is responsive, but I'm not getting a tray icon. Also there is a GTK warning message when it starts. Some suggestions: * I instinctively tried the

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Anthony Walter wrote: To Debian based Lazarus users, if you have the inclination can you test this out, or provide some feedback: http://www.getlazarus.org/apps/cpugraph/ Here is a video of the program if you want a better idea of what it does before you try it:

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Paul Michell wrote: Anthony Testing on Kubuntu 64 15.04, I can't find it on the KDE menu, but running from the command line works. The utility looks good and is responsive, but I'm not getting a tray icon. Also there is a GTK warning message when it starts. Some

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Luca, thanks for that very observational point. I actually do a basic check for a compositing window manage which will result in the problem you described. There is a command line switch to force it off in the program. cpugraph -flat Unfortunately I didn't tie it to the opacity/visibility, which

[Lazarus] Test This Please

To Debian based Lazarus users, if you have the inclination can you test this out, or provide some feedback: http://www.getlazarus.org/apps/cpugraph/ Here is a video of the program if you want a better idea of what it does before you try it: http://cache.getlazarus.org/video/cpugraph-scrub.mp4

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Paul, there is a misspelling in my makedeb program that results in Utilities not appearing in dash/spotlight searches. I'll fix it in the next revision (soon). Regarding clicking on the window, most of the window is transparent to mouse events, save for the slider. I'll look into putting a context

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Thanks for the feedback Michael. The problem is the compositing opacity setting. I'll do a new build right now to fix this issue. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On 11/06/2015 11:15 AM, Anthony Walter wrote: > Good feedback. Regarding arrows keys, the window is actually a popup and > as such I'm not sure it can receive input focus. I'll investigate. The > cpu graph isolation suggestion is a really good idea. > > Thanks. My pleasure, thank you for the

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On 06/11/15 10:40, Anthony Walter wrote: By the way, there should be a tray icon with an Exit option. I don't get a tray icon at all. Is that because I've started it from the command line? (Please excuse the quality of the screen-shot, I had to squish it pretty hard to get under the 100K

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Is there a way to I compile it for windows? I want it too! ;) Regards, Ara -- http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different... -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Okay I put up new debs (cpugraph_1.0.1-1) which if you get and run will just overwrite the previous version, assuming the program isn't running. * Fixed the proper spelling Utility category to the desktop file. * Removed some known compositors (Mutter, KWin) * Without the compositing the window

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Am Friday 06 November 2015 09:55:06 schrieb Anthony Walter: > To Debian based Lazarus users, if you have the inclination can you test > this out, or provide some feedback: works fine on opensuse 13.2 with KDE3 (yes 3) Tray icon works too for your deb tool you can take some inspiration form here:

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Anthony Walter wrote: Okay I put up new debs (cpugraph_1.0.1-1) which if you get and run will just overwrite the previous version, assuming the program isn't running. Nice job. I tested the new version on another machine (also KDE), there the shortcut does work. I do

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Paul, a little later I'll do a rebuild with my alternate tray icon code and we'll see if that fix the issue. There should definitively be a tray icon, otherwise you need to use "kill " from the terminal to ask it to close gracefully, and "kill -KILL " to force anything to close ungracefully. --

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Michael, I am going to release my makedeb application and then come back to fixing/modifying this app. I'll work on z-order per your suggestion, but also add the ability to move/resize the default position. I also plan to add a options screen where you can redefine the colors, the animation

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On 11/06/2015 12:11 PM, Anthony Walter wrote: Okay I put up new debs (cpugraph_1.0.1-1) which if you get and run will just overwrite the previous version, assuming the program isn't running. * Fixed the proper spelling Utility category to the desktop file. * Removed some known compositors

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Paul, I think that's an issue with the Lazarus Gtk2 TTrayIcon component just not showing up on Kde, and nothing to do with being launched from the command line. A few weeks ago I added support to the component for Unity app indicators and it was reported to have fixed the issue, but I removed it

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

On 06/11/15 11:11, Anthony Walter wrote: Okay I put up new debs (cpugraph_1.0.1-1) which if you get and run will just overwrite the previous version, assuming the program isn't running. The menu is now fixed and I can run from there, but still no tray icon, so no way to close it? --

Re: [Lazarus] Test This Please

Thanks mentioning LazPackager. I think I now have have a better way to find dependencies. Are -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] test

...test successful. On Sep 12, 2015 7:01 AM, "Martin Frb" wrote: > test > > -- > ___ > Lazarus mailing list > Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > --

[Lazarus] test

test -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] TEST

-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] TEST

- -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] Test issue #22215 about PageControl on Windows

I could not reproduce but I committed the patch for easy testing. Please test everybody with Windows. http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22215 Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

[Lazarus] test if the list is down, since 21.3.13 no mails?!!

-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] Test for html formatting

Is it ok now ? There's another html setting in kmail (when composing message in menu Options, and that was On ... I've never enabled it so don't know why it was enabled) zeljko -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Test for html formatting

On 8/26/12, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote: Is it ok now ? There's another html setting in kmail (when composing message in menu Options, and that was On ... I've never enabled it so don't know why it was enabled) zeljko To me (using gmail) it looks like any other unfromatted text. I hope

[Lazarus] Test - Please Ignore

Please Ignore. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] Test

Please can someone respond, as I don't think my messages are gettingthrough to the list. Thanks Richard -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Test

On 02/3/12 9:22, Richard Mace wrote: Please can someone respond, as I don't think my messages are getting through to the list. That message appeared OK. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Test

Many thanks Howard On 2 March 2012 09:32, Howard Page-Clark h...@talktalk.net wrote: On 02/3/12 9:22, Richard Mace wrote: Please can someone respond, as I don't think my messages are getting through to the list. That message appeared OK. --

[Lazarus] test

Test -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] Test

Please ignore. Just a test -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On 12/02/2011 16:13, Vincent Snijders wrote: It is only a RC branch until the release after that is a fixes branch. Maybe it would confuse people less, if it the branch is renamed, but I doubt that. Vincent Yes it will confuse people less : look at Linux case - they have longterm,

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/2/16 Lukasz Sokol el.es...@gmail.com: On 12/02/2011 16:13, Vincent Snijders wrote: It is only a RC branch until the release after that is a fixes branch. Maybe it would confuse people less, if it the branch is renamed, but I doubt that. Vincent Yes it will confuse people less : look

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On 16/02/2011 10:44, Vincent Snijders wrote: Yes it will confuse people less : look at Linux case - they have longterm, stable, rcX and 'bleeding-edge' or 'developer' branches reflected in names of releases... But this also comes with a policy what kind of patch is accepted into which

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Can you clear this up for me? Here's the way I understand it. - Even numbers are reserved for stable releases: 0.9.28.2 is the current stable release. - Odd numbers are used for the development branch: 0.9.31 is the current svn development branch. (Why isn't it 0.9.29 then?) - Fixes branch is for

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Am 16.02.2011 15:46, schrieb John Stoneham: Can you clear this up for me? Here's the way I understand it. - Even numbers are reserved for stable releases: 0.9.28.2 is the current stable release. - Odd numbers are used for the development branch: 0.9.31 is the current svn development branch.

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/2/16 John Stoneham captnjamesk...@gmail.com: Can you clear this up for me? Here's the way I understand it. - Even numbers are reserved for stable releases: 0.9.28.2 is the current stable release. Even last numbers are meant for releases. Those don't change. - Odd numbers are used for the

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Op 2011-02-16 21:27, Vincent Snijders het geskryf: I guess that is what this page is about: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Version_Numbering I've updated the graph and some other text to reflect the latest state of the SubVersion repository. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit -

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/2/17 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com: Op 2011-02-16 21:27, Vincent Snijders het geskryf: I guess that is what this page is about: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Version_Numbering I've updated the graph and some other text to reflect the latest state of the SubVersion

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Bernd Kreuss wrote: * The current stable release of Lazaus is 0.9.28.2, you can download it here: [link] * Release candidates for the new upcoming release are 0.9.29-x, please test them and report bugs, you can download them here: [link] * Daily snapshots of the trunk are 0.9.31-x, they are

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On 24.12.2010 10:50, Vincent Snijders wrote: Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered release candidates for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release. Report issues in the bug tracker. When the user

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/2/12 Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.com: On 24.12.2010 10:50, Vincent Snijders wrote: Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered release candidates for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release.

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.comwrote: communicated much better with more standard terminology and the 0.9.30 RC should not be named 0.9.29 and RC should be labeled as such and not fixes because fixes would imply maintenance of an already released branch.

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/2/12 John Stoneham captnjamesk...@gmail.com: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.com wrote: communicated much better with more standard terminology and the 0.9.30 RC should not be named 0.9.29 and RC should be labeled as such and not fixes because fixes

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On 12.02.2011 16:11, Vincent Snijders wrote: Or at least make them more prominent on the Snapshots page or even create a separate page Release candidates or something like that in the site navigation between Download and Dayly Snapshots? Those are good ideas. Also maybe instead of the new

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Only 2 now! 2011/1/26 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com Only 3 issues left. Good work, guys! 2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view_all_set.php?type=3source_query_id=1811 for current open issues for the next release. Vincent

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Only 3 issues left. Good work, guys! 2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com See http://bugs.freepascal.org/view_all_set.php?type=3source_query_id=1811 for current open issues for the next release. Vincent -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa Linux User #113925 --

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_0_9_30/. From this branch the next Lazarus release 0.9.30 will be released. Build and basic operation OK for x86, SPARC

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Hi, I would like to point out that these are regressions: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18243 http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17554 -- cobines -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On 14 January 2011 19:47, Vincent Snijders wrote: Yes, today until now, nothing has been updated. When 0.9.30 fixes branch is updated, please give use some time to re-test those changes before a release is made. -- Regards,   - Graeme - ___ fpGUI

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 32 bits, with daily svn update. Today it seems nothing was updated, it's correct? 2011/1/10 Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/1/14 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com: I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 32 bits, with daily svn update. Today it seems nothing was updated, it's correct? Yes, today until now, nothing has been updated. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

I've just added a comment to a bug report. 2011/1/14 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com 2011/1/14 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com: I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 32 bits, with daily svn update. Today it seems nothing was updated, it's correct? Yes, today until now,

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Vincent Snijders wrote: Hi, Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_0_9_30/. From this branch the next Lazarus release 0.9.30 will be released. Build and basic operation OK for x86, SPARC and PPC (all Linux). ARM

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

While there is no 0.9.30 version to choose from in Mantis, I added a '0.9.30' tag to my bug report. Mouse cursor disappears while modal dialog is visible http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18394 Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com: Hi, Found two problems in the first minute of testing. * Just checked out the 'fixes_0.9.30' and did a 'make lcl bigide'. Lazarus reports it's version still as 0.9.29 instead of 0.9.30 The fixes branch contains 0.9.29. After the release,

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com: Op 2011-01-05 09:38, Vincent Snijders het geskryf: ... and newly found issues (even regressions) are unlikely to block a release. That's not good practice.  Unless the first release of 0.9.30 branch will be a rc1 release, instead of stable

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Please guys and girls, help test the 0.9.30 branch. Vincent asked for this request over a week ago, and he seems to have gotten little response. I've been using 0.9.30 for an hour and already reported 6 bugs. Lets make 0.9.30 release a REAL STABLE release please. What you don't report, the

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Here is what I got so far: 0018399 Editor 'tabs on right' is not remembered after restart 0018398 IDE Help Options - text gets clipped 0018397 IDE Options | Event Log | has a empty groupbox 0018396 Lazarus IDE creates lots of empty config dirs 0018395 JCF config file displayed with

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

05.01.2011 16:27, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: 0018397 IDE Options | Event Log | has a empty groupbox This groupbox is reserved for future. Event log is not implemented now but I hope it will be before the 1.0 release. Best regards, Paul Ishenin --

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Op 2011-01-05 12:38, Paul Ishenin het geskryf: 0018397 IDE Options | Event Log | has a empty groupbox This groupbox is reserved for future. Event log is not implemented now but I hope it will be before the 1.0 release. OK thanks. May I then suggest that the groupbox, or even better, the

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Am I too late for testing? If not, how much time do we have? I'm switching to the 0.9.30 branch today for my day-to-day work. I'll report issues as I find them (if I'm not too late). Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com: Am I too late for testing? If not, how much time do we have? I'm switching to the 0.9.30 branch today for my day-to-day work. I'll report issues as I find them (if I'm not too late). It is not too late for testing. But merging to the fixes

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com: Am I too late for testing? If not, how much time do we have? How much time depends on how fast Mattias fixes the remaining 0.9.30 issues. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Op 2011-01-05 09:38, Vincent Snijders het geskryf: ... and newly found issues (even regressions) are unlikely to block a release. That's not good practice. Unless the first release of 0.9.30 branch will be a rc1 release, instead of stable release. Anyway, thanks for the reply. I'll report

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Hi, Found two problems in the first minute of testing. * Just checked out the 'fixes_0.9.30' and did a 'make lcl bigide'. Lazarus reports it's version still as 0.9.29 instead of 0.9.30 * Mantis doesn't have a Product Version of 0.9.30 to choose from. So how are we supposed to report 0.9.30

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Op 2011-01-05 09:58, Graeme Geldenhuys het geskryf: * Just checked out the 'fixes_0.9.30' and did a 'make lcl bigide'. Lazarus reports it's version still as 0.9.29 instead of 0.9.30 This is what Lazarus reports: Pasted from the popup menu in the About dialog: Lazarus 0.9.29 r28865 FPC

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 19:50, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote: Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered release candidates for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release. Report issues

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

Hi, Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180 but has some regressions. See new issue opened for explanation: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16742 -- cobines -- ___

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2010/12/24 cobines cobi...@gmail.com: Hi, Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180 but has some regressions. See new issue opened for explanation: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16742 What is worse?

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2010/12/24 Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 19:50, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote: Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered release candidates for the

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com: 2010/12/24 cobines cobi...@gmail.com: Hi, Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180 but has some regressions. See new issue opened for explanation:

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

24.12.2010 20:44, cobines пишет: 2010/12/24 Vincent Snijdersvincent.snijd...@gmail.com: 2010/12/24 cobinescobi...@gmail.com: Hi, Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180 but has some regressions. See new issue opened

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 03:30, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/12/24 Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com: I would like to note that http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16764 and http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17217 are regressions. Do you have an idea which

Re: [Lazarus] Test the Lazarus fixes_0_9_30 branch

2010/12/25 Maxim Ganetsky gan...@narod.ru: 24.12.2010 20:44, cobines пишет: 2010/12/24 Vincent Snijdersvincent.snijd...@gmail.com: 2010/12/24 cobinescobi...@gmail.com: Hi, Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue: http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180

[Lazarus] Test

new gmail IMAP connection. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] test suite

Trying to run the test/runtestsgui, I noted that the project has a variable for the PrimaryConfigPath, which if set is passed on to the lazbuild.exe. Only I couldn't find where it get's set (e.g. passing a parameter to the testgui.exe does not seem to do it? Martin --

[Lazarus] test

-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] [test] testing mail setup

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 Please ignore this message. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal