Am 27.03.2012 22:25, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Wait till they ask for integration with Google docs and Microsoft Live. (or
office 365).
Yeah, my boss was all for Google docs too, until we had an ISP outage!
Oops. Suddenly the whole cloud computing thing became a do not go
there sign. Not to
Am 27.03.2012 22:25, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Wait till they ask for integration with Google docs and Microsoft Live.
(or
office 365).
Yeah, my boss was all for Google docs too, until we had an ISP outage!
Oops. Suddenly the whole cloud computing thing became a do not go
there sign.
On 28/03/2012 14:12, Andrew Brunner wrote:
I agree. I never understood how public services could even be
allowed to place work product in the hands of Google or Microsoft.
These two search engine companies make BILLIONS from information
brokering. Data is king (to them) and money just
On 28 March 2012 15:26, Lukasz Sokol el.es.cr@... wrote:
Semi-rebuttal (as I'm not a fan of The Cloud either) - they store the
data in secured datacenters, and probably encrypted too, for storage AND
access. They have redundant power, internet links, infrastructure, dedicated
to-the-case
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
This is probably one of the big reasons I dislike (hate is a bit
harsh) the current state of the internet - it's all a bandwidth hog
forcing everything to be slow. And seeing that just about every second
website is a near web application
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com
So has anybody done some bandwidth breakdowns of there FCL-web based
websites or web applications? How do you fare?
I have an entire cloud platform developed in FPC/Lazarus and studied my
framework and the impact
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com
So has anybody done some bandwidth breakdowns of there FCL-web based
websites or web applications? How do you fare?
I have an entire cloud platform developed in
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
So next time, don't just blindly throw in various JavaScript
frameworks to make your web app or website look good. Think about the
bandwidth being used per loaded page too.
It's not only bandwith. I only use Firefox with NoScript addon which
prevents my browser
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
Javascript is not something you can avoid. People have come to expect a
certain functionality from a website, which can only be delivered with
Javasvript. If you don't provide it, your product will not sell.
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
Javascript is not something you can avoid. People have come to expect a
certain functionality from a website, which can only be delivered with
Javasvript. If you don't provide it, your product will not sell. It's
as simple as
2012/3/27 Michael Van Canneyt michael@...:
These applications must behave and act as a desktop application, this is a
requirement. This is not possible without Javascript.
Then you may ask, why not simply program a desktop application ?
LOL, you took the words (or rather question) right out
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2012/3/27 Michael Van Canneyt michael@...:
These applications must behave and act as a desktop application, this is a
requirement. This is not possible without Javascript.
Then you may ask, why not simply program a desktop application ?
LOL,
On 27 March 2012 21:54, Michael Van Canneyt michael@ wrote:
1. We use client/server technology.
Meaning that sometimes, the server says 'update NOW', whether client is
ready for it or not.
That's when you slip them the silent update version, which updates
before the app launches (no
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
Javascript is not something you can avoid. People have come to expect a
certain functionality from a website, which can only be delivered with
Javasvript. If you don't provide it, your product will not sell. It's as
simple as that.
I doubt that. Just the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Personally I still think Java applets (or Java apps launched via the
web) are way better than web apps. They can be cached locally for
quick launches in the future, way more responsive, full featured with
the
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, ABorka wrote:
michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
If it was not for that small detail, I would not touch web programming
with a long stick. No set standards, different and ever-changing
browsers, a language that sucks big time. But alas...
Michael.
...And it does
16 matches
Mail list logo
