On 12/02/2011 16:13, Vincent Snijders wrote:
It is only a RC branch until the release after that is a fixes branch.
Maybe it would confuse people less, if it the branch is renamed, but I
doubt that.
Vincent
Yes it will confuse people less : look at Linux case - they have longterm,
2011/2/16 Lukasz Sokol el.es...@gmail.com:
On 12/02/2011 16:13, Vincent Snijders wrote:
It is only a RC branch until the release after that is a fixes branch.
Maybe it would confuse people less, if it the branch is renamed, but I
doubt that.
Vincent
Yes it will confuse people less : look
On 16/02/2011 10:44, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Yes it will confuse people less : look at Linux case - they have longterm,
stable, rcX and
'bleeding-edge' or 'developer' branches reflected in names of releases...
But this also comes with a policy what kind of patch is accepted into which
Can you clear this up for me?
Here's the way I understand it.
- Even numbers are reserved for stable releases: 0.9.28.2 is the current
stable release.
- Odd numbers are used for the development branch: 0.9.31 is the current svn
development branch. (Why isn't it 0.9.29 then?)
- Fixes branch is for
Am 16.02.2011 15:46, schrieb John Stoneham:
Can you clear this up for me?
Here's the way I understand it.
- Even numbers are reserved for stable releases: 0.9.28.2 is the current
stable release.
- Odd numbers are used for the development branch: 0.9.31 is the current
svn development branch.
2011/2/16 John Stoneham captnjamesk...@gmail.com:
Can you clear this up for me?
Here's the way I understand it.
- Even numbers are reserved for stable releases: 0.9.28.2 is the current
stable release.
Even last numbers are meant for releases. Those don't change.
- Odd numbers are used for the
Op 2011-02-16 21:27, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
I guess that is what this page is about:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Version_Numbering
I've updated the graph and some other text to reflect the latest state
of the SubVersion repository.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit -
2011/2/17 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
Op 2011-02-16 21:27, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
I guess that is what this page is about:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Version_Numbering
I've updated the graph and some other text to reflect the latest state
of the SubVersion
Bernd Kreuss wrote:
* The current stable release of Lazaus is 0.9.28.2, you can download it
here: [link]
* Release candidates for the new upcoming release are 0.9.29-x, please
test them and report bugs, you can download them here: [link]
* Daily snapshots of the trunk are 0.9.31-x, they are
On 24.12.2010 10:50, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with
Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered
release candidates for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release. Report
issues in the bug tracker.
When the user
2011/2/12 Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.com:
On 24.12.2010 10:50, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with
Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered
release candidates for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.comwrote:
communicated much better with more standard terminology and the 0.9.30
RC should not be named 0.9.29 and RC should be labeled as such and not
fixes because fixes would imply maintenance of an already released
branch.
2011/2/12 John Stoneham captnjamesk...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Bernd Kreuss prof7...@googlemail.com
wrote:
communicated much better with more standard terminology and the 0.9.30
RC should not be named 0.9.29 and RC should be labeled as such and not
fixes because fixes
On 12.02.2011 16:11, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Or at least make them more prominent on the Snapshots page or even
create a separate page Release candidates or something like that in
the site navigation between Download and Dayly Snapshots?
Those are good ideas.
Also maybe instead of the new
Only 2 now!
2011/1/26 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com
Only 3 issues left. Good work, guys!
2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com
See
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view_all_set.php?type=3source_query_id=1811
for current open issues for the next release.
Vincent
Only 3 issues left. Good work, guys!
2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com
See
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view_all_set.php?type=3source_query_id=1811
for current open issues for the next release.
Vincent
--
Atenciosamente,
Alexsander da Rosa
Linux User #113925
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_0_9_30/. From
this branch the next Lazarus release 0.9.30 will be released.
Build and basic operation OK for x86, SPARC
Hi,
I would like to point out that these are regressions:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18243
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17554
--
cobines
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 14 January 2011 19:47, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Yes, today until now, nothing has been updated.
When 0.9.30 fixes branch is updated, please give use some time to
re-test those changes before a release is made.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI
I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 32 bits, with daily svn update.
Today it seems nothing was updated, it's correct?
2011/1/10 Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to
2011/1/14 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com:
I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 32 bits, with daily svn update.
Today it seems nothing was updated, it's correct?
Yes, today until now, nothing has been updated.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
I've just added a comment to a bug report.
2011/1/14 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com
2011/1/14 Alexsander Rosa alexsander.r...@gmail.com:
I'm testing on Ubuntu 10.10 32 bits, with daily svn update.
Today it seems nothing was updated, it's correct?
Yes, today until now,
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday Lazarus trunk was branched to
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_0_9_30/. From
this branch the next Lazarus release 0.9.30 will be released.
Build and basic operation OK for x86, SPARC and PPC (all Linux). ARM
While there is no 0.9.30 version to choose from in Mantis, I added a
'0.9.30' tag to my bug report.
Mouse cursor disappears while modal dialog is visible
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18394
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Found two problems in the first minute of testing.
* Just checked out the 'fixes_0.9.30' and did a 'make lcl bigide'. Lazarus
reports it's version still as 0.9.29 instead of 0.9.30
The fixes branch contains 0.9.29. After the release,
2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
Op 2011-01-05 09:38, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
... and newly found issues (even regressions)
are unlikely to block a release.
That's not good practice. Unless the first release of 0.9.30 branch will
be a rc1 release, instead of stable
Please guys and girls, help test the 0.9.30 branch. Vincent asked for this
request over a week ago, and he seems to have gotten little response. I've
been using 0.9.30 for an hour and already reported 6 bugs.
Lets make 0.9.30 release a REAL STABLE release please. What you don't
report, the
Here is what I got so far:
0018399 Editor 'tabs on right' is not remembered after restart
0018398 IDE Help Options - text gets clipped
0018397 IDE Options | Event Log | has a empty groupbox
0018396 Lazarus IDE creates lots of empty config dirs
0018395 JCF config file displayed with
05.01.2011 16:27, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
0018397 IDE Options | Event Log | has a empty groupbox
This groupbox is reserved for future. Event log is not implemented now
but I hope it will be before the 1.0 release.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
--
Op 2011-01-05 12:38, Paul Ishenin het geskryf:
0018397 IDE Options | Event Log | has a empty groupbox
This groupbox is reserved for future. Event log is not implemented now
but I hope it will be before the 1.0 release.
OK thanks. May I then suggest that the groupbox, or even better, the
Am I too late for testing? If not, how much time do we have?
I'm switching to the 0.9.30 branch today for my day-to-day work. I'll
report issues as I find them (if I'm not too late).
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
Am I too late for testing? If not, how much time do we have?
I'm switching to the 0.9.30 branch today for my day-to-day work. I'll
report issues as I find them (if I'm not too late).
It is not too late for testing. But merging to the fixes
2011/1/5 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
Am I too late for testing? If not, how much time do we have?
How much time depends on how fast Mattias fixes the remaining 0.9.30 issues.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Op 2011-01-05 09:38, Vincent Snijders het geskryf:
... and newly found issues (even regressions)
are unlikely to block a release.
That's not good practice. Unless the first release of 0.9.30 branch will
be a rc1 release, instead of stable release.
Anyway, thanks for the reply. I'll report
Hi,
Found two problems in the first minute of testing.
* Just checked out the 'fixes_0.9.30' and did a 'make lcl bigide'. Lazarus
reports it's version still as 0.9.29 instead of 0.9.30
* Mantis doesn't have a Product Version of 0.9.30 to choose from. So how
are we supposed to report 0.9.30
Op 2011-01-05 09:58, Graeme Geldenhuys het geskryf:
* Just checked out the 'fixes_0.9.30' and did a 'make lcl bigide'. Lazarus
reports it's version still as 0.9.29 instead of 0.9.30
This is what Lazarus reports: Pasted from the popup menu in the About dialog:
Lazarus 0.9.29 r28865 FPC
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 19:50, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with
Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered
release candidates for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.30 release. Report
issues
Hi,
Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180
but has some regressions.
See new issue opened for explanation:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16742
--
cobines
--
___
2010/12/24 cobines cobi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180
but has some regressions.
See new issue opened for explanation:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16742
What is worse?
2010/12/24 Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 19:50, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
Please test the Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots for regressions compared with
Lazarus 0.9.28.2; These Lazarus 0.9.29 snapshots can be considered
release candidates for the
2010/12/24 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
2010/12/24 cobines cobi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180
but has some regressions.
See new issue opened for explanation:
24.12.2010 20:44, cobines пишет:
2010/12/24 Vincent Snijdersvincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
2010/12/24 cobinescobi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180
but has some regressions.
See new issue opened
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 03:30, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/12/24 Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com:
I would like to note that
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16764 and
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17217
are regressions.
Do you have an idea which
2010/12/25 Maxim Ganetsky gan...@narod.ru:
24.12.2010 20:44, cobines пишет:
2010/12/24 Vincent Snijdersvincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
2010/12/24 cobinescobi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Please consider reverting commit 25431 from 0.9.30. It fixes issue:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=0015180
44 matches
Mail list logo
