On 11/13/2013 12:14 AM, Bart wrote:
Possibly related to http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23266 ?
If not the same, please open a bugreport on the bugtracker.
No, he is using qt ws
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 12/11/13 22:52, Bart wrote:
On 11/12/13, waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
you do not need any of the above if you change
Days := (DaysPerMonth(M1, IsLeapYear(Y2)) - D1) + D2 ;
to
Days := (DaysInAMonth(Y2,M1) - D1) + D2;
I did not know about DaysInAMonth.
I
[snip]
All this, should be planned to use 64 bit Unix Timestamps already ;)
(year 2038 is not that long away)
-L.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 13.11.2013 02:33, waldo kitty wrote:
actually, i have in some cases... let's ask this question and see what
your charts and routines return as the result... assuming your format
is DD.MM....
Date1 := 01.01.2000
Date2 := 01.01.2000
should be 0 (zero), right?
then
Date1 :=
On 11/13/2013 3:53 AM, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
[snip]
All this, should be planned to use 64 bit Unix Timestamps already ;)
(year 2038 is not that long away)
agreed but that is dependent on what TDateTime does since it is built on that
like other existing time and date routines ;)
at one point
This is my first post on this mailing list, so please bear with me.
I used to do date calculations like this in the '80s when I was writing
Real Estate software.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:33:00, waldo kitty wrote:
[...]
the real question is this:
what do we count? the starting day, the
On 11/13/2013 5:19 AM, John Landmesser wrote:
On 13.11.2013 02:33, waldo kitty wrote:
actually, i have in some cases... let's ask this question and see what your
charts and routines return as the result... assuming your format is
DD.MM....
Date1 := 01.01.2000
Date2 := 01.01.2000
should
For a very simple help (f.e. for a small program or utility) you can
also use LazHelp to embed the documentation in your application:
http://badsector.github.io/lazhelp/
Note that i haven't updated for a while so it might not compile
cleanly (it does compile though). Also i'm going to move it
On 13.11.2013 14:02, waldo kitty wrote:
We don't need to invent the wheel again, because others have
solutions for that!
then why does this thread exist? O:)
I'll try to find what the usual way is to handle these problems: c++
Libraries for example?!
i don't know as i do not have
Hello,
I managed to add a write watch to my variable VarA which is an
instance of a class and it works fine following instructions here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/IDE_Window:Breakpoints
But actually I would like to watch when a field inside the class is
modified. Any way to do that? I tried
Hi All,
Running the latest RC in stock Xubutu 12.04 and Ctrl-F9 doesn't work, but
if you select compile from the menu, it works fine.
Any ides?
Richard
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
NOTE: subject fixed to indicate the actual topic ;)
On 11/13/2013 6:24 AM, Lex Edmonds wrote:
This is my first post on this mailing list, so please bear with me.
I used to do date calculations like this in the '80s when I was writing Real
Estate software.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:33:00, waldo
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:05:20 +
Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Running the latest RC in stock Xubutu 12.04 and Ctrl-F9 doesn't work, but
if you select compile from the menu, it works fine.
Any ides?
Check your short cuts in your system settings. They take precedence
On 13/11/2013 14:54, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Hello,
I managed to add a write watch to my variable VarA which is an
instance of a class and it works fine following instructions here:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/IDE_Window:Breakpoints
But actually I would like to watch when a field
Hello,
This announce is about a Brazilian project written in Free Pascal, for
generating Bank payment slips (in Brazil, it is called as Boletos
bancários).
Link to the project page:
http://silvioprog.github.io/zboleto
Supported banks:
. Banco do Brasil;
. Bradesco;
. Caixa Econômica Federal;
On 13/11/2013 15:47, Martin wrote:
What type is the field?
It works here.
Couple of points:
- You must use global for scope. Unless your object var VarA is a
global var).
Otherwise varA will go out of scope, and gdb has no idea there are
other refs to the object.
- You must delete, and
Also, it may not work, if the fields type is declared inline
AFoo: array of integer;
because the IDE needs the name of the type for a typecast in the gdb
expression generated
It is array of SomeStructure declared inline indeed ... I'll try to
change to a named type, thanks.
--
Felipe
Am 2013-11-13 16:22, schrieb waldo kitty:
A baby born on 1/01/2007 would be 7 days old on 7/01/2007.
true :)
Realy?
That would mean that a baby born on 2007-01-01 10:00
is two days old on 2007-01-02 10:00?
To me this seems wrong because after 24 hours is only one day old.
A simple substraction
On 11/13/2013 9:37 AM, John Landmesser wrote:
On 13.11.2013 14:02, waldo kitty wrote:
We don't need to invent the wheel again, because others have solutions for that!
then why does this thread exist? O:)
I'll try to find what the usual way is to handle these problems: c++ Libraries
for
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:38:28PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:05:20 +
Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Running the latest RC in stock Xubutu 12.04 and Ctrl-F9 doesn't work, but
if you select compile from the menu, it works fine.
Any
Great work!
thanks a lot!
Em 13/11/2013 13:53, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com escreveu:
Hello,
This announce is about a Brazilian project written in Free Pascal, for
generating Bank payment slips (in Brazil, it is called as Boletos
bancários).
Link to the project page:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:00:39 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Seeing this, I can't help but think that the approximation approach
may not be such a bad idea after all :D
Can you elaborate what the approximation is? I fail to see it.
1 julian year = 365.25 days of
Hi,
just to let you know.
I opened all 110 projects in the examples folder and tried to compile them. (on
win xp sp1)
Congratulation, there were only a very few projects with problems:
checkbox: Problem with writlen in TForm1.CheckBoxClick Runerror 103
File not open
speedtest:
== Why should everybody (including you) test the release candidate? ==
I've just compiled 1.2 RC1 for GTK2 on a clean x86 Linux system using
2.6.2, running an older version of Debian (lenny). I notice that the
icons on the toolbar don't appear until either the pointer is moved over
them, or
On 13.11.2013 18:31, waldo kitty wrote:
On 11/13/2013 9:37 AM, John Landmesser wrote:
On 13.11.2013 14:02, waldo kitty wrote:
We don't need to invent the wheel again, because others have
solutions for that!
then why does this thread exist? O:)
I'll try to find what the usual way is to
As a work around, try using showmessage(variable.field):
That will at least let you see what's in the variable at that point, and
program execution should stop until you hit OK.
-Chris
Information in this message is intended for sole use of the recipient unless
otherwise noted.
On Nov
Hi
I could not get the breakpoints to work, I googled a lot, tried all the
suggestions
unsuccessfully.
After a full day of trial I ended up that now the project does not show
anything in the Debugger output window.
I have this setup
Windows XP, lazarus 1.0,12, svn 42478
(installed with the exe
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:00:39 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Seeing this, I can't help but think that the approximation approach
may not be such a bad idea after all :D
Can you elaborate what the approximation is?
On 11/13/2013 1:42 PM, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:00:39 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
Seeing this, I can't help but think that the approximation approach
may not be such a bad idea after all :D
Can you elaborate what the approximation is? I
On 13/11/2013 20:40, GREP wrote:
Hi
I could not get the breakpoints to work, I googled a lot, tried all the
suggestions
unsuccessfully.
After a full day of trial I ended up that now the project does not show
anything in the Debugger output window.
I have this setup
Windows XP, lazarus 1.0,12,
On 11/13/13, John Landmesser joh...@online.de wrote:
I'm just a hobbyist, never went to university to study computer science.
So am I.
(For my background, see my userpage on the wiki)
We don't need to invent the wheel again, because others have solutions
for that!
Of course we don't have to.
On 11/13/13, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Check your short cuts in your system settings. They take precedence
over any normal application like the IDE.
On my Fedora 18 / KDE Ctrl+F9 does something weird to the windows that
I cannot really describe or give a name.
I'm too
On 13.11.2013 23:14, Bart wrote:
On 11/13/13, John Landmesser joh...@online.de wrote:
I'm just a hobbyist, never went to university to study computer science.
So am I.
(For my background, see my userpage on the wiki)
Found your userpage , read it with great interest.
Your experience with
On 11/13/2013 5:14 PM, Bart wrote:
On 11/13/13, John Landmesser joh...@online.de wrote:
I'm just a hobbyist, never went to university to study computer science.
So am I.
(For my background, see my userpage on the wiki)
i probably should set something, too... while i have an account on the
Hi,
So the difference between 2007-01-01 12:00 and 2008-01-01 12:00 ist
*not* one year?
No, the base definition of the year is not a digit change, but the time
it take to the Earth to return at the same point of its orbit around the
Sun.
This is actually 365.2422 days, and this is named
Am 2013-11-13 19:42, schrieb Reimar Grabowski:
1 julian year = 365.25 days of 86400 SI seconds each.
Of course there are lots of other definitions for year but if FPC uses the
julian one the value is exact and no approximation
So the difference between 2007-01-01 12:00 and 2008-01-01 12:00
On 11/14/2013 07:19 AM, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
But this it totaly wrong.
As is defining a meter by the count stretched rubber bands: 1 2, 3, 4 or
5 All numbers are true and all are wrong :-) :-) :-)
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
37 matches
Mail list logo
