Hans-Peter Diettrich schreef:
After I created the package during above steps, and updated the original
sample project to use the new package, everything worked fine on Linux.
Not so on Windows :-(
[I'll retry and report later]
If it works on Linux but not on windows, then you probably have s
I want to create a package from my
lazarus/examples/dockmanager/easytree/ project, containing the
EasyDockSite docking manager. Creating the package is no problem, it
compiles without problems, and as a runtime-only package with no visual
components it needs no installation. But I could not yet
The examples only work with FPC sources later than 4/30/2009 when the
last patch (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13254) of fcl-web was
implemented.
You need to get the latest FPC fcl-web source codes for them to work.
It is possible to just replace the files in your
/packages/fcl-web/
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:30:52 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> 2009/6/3 Vincent Snijders :
> >
> > If it isn't broken, don't fix it.
>
> :-) Crappy answer.
No, only too condensed. ;)
> > Correct. The change was needed, because more and more the executable
> > directory was off limits for writin
urlsession.lpr(13,39) Error: Identifier not found "TFPWebModule1"
urlsession.lpr(13,53) Error: Identifier not found "FPWebModule1"
urlsession.lpr(17) Fatal: There were 2 errors compiling module, stopping
webmodule.pas(151,33) Error: Identifier not found "Request"
webmodule.pas(188,13) Error: ident
En/na Graeme Geldenhuys ha escrit:
2009/6/3 Luca Olivetti :
Which is (partially) broken under windows
Did you file a bug report for this? If not, please do so. Also, is it
a bug in GetAppConfigDir(False) function which means it's a FPC bug
report, or is it Lazarus specific.
I /think/ it's a
> Because the installation directory in not necessarily writable by
> users. Plus one install of Lazarus IDE could be used by many users, so
> a single profile location via lazarus.ini will not work. For example,
> we have a shared 64bit Linux server with Lazarus IDE installed. Many
> developer con
2009/6/3 Luca Olivetti :
>
> Which is (partially) broken under windows
Did you file a bug report for this? If not, please do so. Also, is it
a bug in GetAppConfigDir(False) function which means it's a FPC bug
report, or is it Lazarus specific.
Regards,
- Graeme -
2009/6/3 Zaher Dirkey :
> Why can not define where we like to put our config dir, for example
> make a lazarus.ini lazarus.config in same Lazarus dir and then read
> the path from it.
Because the installation directory in not necessarily writable by
users. Plus one install of Lazarus IDE could be
En/na Graeme Geldenhuys ha escrit:
2009/6/3 Martin Friebe :
So question is, is the idea as such acceptable?
I hope so. It promotes consistency with the freedesktop.org and it
promotes consistency in Lazarus IDE itself so that ALL platforms use
the GetAppConfigDir() location.
Which is (parti
Why can not define where we like to put our config dir, for example
make a lazarus.ini lazarus.config in same Lazarus dir and then read
the path from it.
I know i can use
--pcp=x:\workdir\lazarus
But that mean i must call lazarus from command prompt or make a shortcut for it.
_
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
2009/6/3 Vincent Snijders :
If it isn't broken, don't fix it.
:-) Crappy answer.
Correct. The change was needed, because more and more the executable
directory was off limits for writing by ordinary users.
So why not change all platforms to use the GetAppConfigD
2009/6/3 Martin Friebe :
>
> So question is, is the idea as such acceptable?
I hope so. It promotes consistency with the freedesktop.org and it
promotes consistency in Lazarus IDE itself so that ALL platforms use
the GetAppConfigDir() location.
Regards,
- Graeme -
__
2009/6/3 Vincent Snijders :
>
> If it isn't broken, don't fix it.
:-) Crappy answer.
> Correct. The change was needed, because more and more the executable
> directory was off limits for writing by ordinary users.
So why not change all platforms to use the GetAppConfigDir(False)
result? I'm a
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
We just spoke about the freedesktop.org directory standards in another
message thread and this made me think. Why isn't Lazarus using the
GetAppConfigDir(False) as it's default location for a
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
We just spoke about the freedesktop.org directory standards in another
message thread and this made me think. Why isn't Lazarus using the
GetAppConfigDir(False) as it's default location for all the IDE config
file
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
We just spoke about the freedesktop.org directory standards in another
message thread and this made me think. Why isn't Lazarus using the
GetAppConfigDir(False) as it's default location for all the IDE config
files. It's hard-coded to $HOME/.l
Hi,
We just spoke about the freedesktop.org directory standards in another
message thread and this made me think. Why isn't Lazarus using the
GetAppConfigDir(False) as it's default location for all the IDE config
files. It's hard-coded to $HOME/.lazarus/ directory for Linux (and
probably other un
18 matches
Mail list logo
