repository. Current 0.9.27 snapshots can be considered a 0.9.28RC2.
>
> I still don't get the logic in version numbering so I may not have
> the correct version for testing the next release. I tried build
> "Lazarus-0.9.29-21480-fpc-2.3.1-20090830-win32" but experienced a
>
CubicDesign wrote:
I really hope that the "Import Delphi project" has been fixed also.
Else, Lazarus is not of much use for many many people.
Yesterday, it consecutively crash and burn every time I tried to
import a tiny Delphi project. Once it even restarted the almighty
Ubuntu box.
Please cre
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
- with xx being even (24, 26, 28) a released version. the code in
this version does not change, a download of 0.9.26 today is the same
as 6 month ago
- with xx being odd (27, 29) a "working" version. The actual work in
process, changes every couple of hours. 0.9.29 is t
Does that mean, that not one "most recent" version exists? Why are
there multiple "working" versions?
Agree with this. Can anybody provide a hint (for those that are too lazy
to Google which version should be actually used), which is the link to
the recommended downloadable version?
--
___
I really hope that the "Import Delphi project" has been fixed also.
Else, Lazarus is not of much use for many many people.
Yesterday, it consecutively crash and burn every time I tried to import
a tiny Delphi project. Once it even restarted the almighty Ubuntu box.
Vincent Snijders wrote:
have you updated fpc to 2.2.4 ? And have
you rebuild the LCL ?
I used this snapshot:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/Lazarus-0.9.29-21480-fpc-2.3.1-20090830-win32.exe
and i didn't change anything.
--
___
Lazarus mail
Martin wrote:
Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
2.) Copying a block with Ctrl+K/C works, but moving it with Ctrl+K/V
does not. Nothing happens except that the block is no longer marked
after that key.
Another (separate) bug report please.
Fixed in the meantime.
Martin
--
___
x27;t get the logic in version numbering so I may not have the
correct version for testing the next release. I tried build
"Lazarus-0.9.29-21480-fpc-2.3.1-20090830-win32" but experienced a
problem:
0.9.xx
- with xx being even (24, 26, 28) a released version. the code in this
version
Hi all,
While FPC had support for unit path (-Fu) containing spaces, Lazarus
IDE still rejects them. If I forced them, the IDE couldn't handle
them, as if they don't exist. Is it correct? Or did I miss something?
TIA.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing st
rsion numbering so I may not have the
correct version for testing the next release. I tried build
"Lazarus-0.9.29-21480-fpc-2.3.1-20090830-win32" but experienced a problem:
When compiling I now get a warning that my project(s) do not use the
unit "interfaces" and whether it
Vincent Snijders schreef:
Hi,
We have started preparations for the upcoming Lazarus 0.9.28 release.
svn trunk has been branched to a fixes_0_9_28 branch, which be used to
create the release from. This branch has currently version 0.9.27.
Snapshots form this branch can be downloaded from
http
11 matches
Mail list logo
