On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:47:59 +0700
Bee Jay bee.ogra...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
While FPC had support for unit path (-Fu) containing spaces, Lazarus
IDE still rejects them. If I forced them, the IDE couldn't handle
them, as if they don't exist. Is it correct? Or did I miss
something?
Martin wrote:
- with xx being even (24, 26, 28) a released version. the code in this
version does not change, a download of 0.9.26 today is the same as 6
month ago
Regarding your last statement, that is in theory only! A 0.9.26 download
today is not guaranteed to be the same after 6 months.
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Martin wrote:
And there is a Tag for each release. Except not yet for 0.9.28. So ones
0.9.28 is mature I expect it will have a tag.
Only thing I do not know is, if those tags ever get moved, which I think
they shouldn't? (Exception: If a day or 2 after release, for
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Graeme, thanks for this nice piece of ASCII-art. Can you add it to
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Version_Numbering , please?
Done!
Thanks, I tried to expand it a bit and hope it makes it even more clear.
Vincent
--
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Thanks, I tried to expand it a bit and hope it makes it even more clear.
Pleasure. You read my mind. Afterwards I thought I better add the
branches\ prefix and 0.9.25 in there as well. I clicked Edit and saw
them already added. :-)
It looks better and more complete
Hi,
Just to let anybody interested know that fixes_0.9.28 is now being
tracked in the Git mirror as well. I'm using Git's cherry-pick command
against trunk to keep the new branch in sync - which also as the benefit
that the 'git pull' has even less to download.
There is no need to re-clone the
