2010/12/1 Darius Blaszyk dhkblas...@zeelandnet.nl:
Ahhh, found it. By setting the window option from Default to Restore
window geometry everything works fine now. I'm surprised though it used
to work by restoring the geometry. What does default mean?
I think default means the designed position
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:35:48 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:47 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to specify things like the base location of files using
environment variables rather than entering full paths.
In
Well, but I don't want to install a new version fo the package, I just
want to modify something in the original code, recompile it and use the
unit in Lazarus.
I tried again but I can't figure it out, so my question is: where does
Lazarus take the compiled FPC libraries to be linked with my
Am 01.12.2010 09:23, schrieb Bo Berglund:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:35:48 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:47 +0100
Bo Berglundbo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to specify things like the base location of files using
environment
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:25:06 +0100
Alberto Manganaro alberto.mangan...@unimib.it wrote:
Well, but I don't want to install a new version fo the package, I just
want to modify something in the original code, recompile it and use the
unit in Lazarus.
I tried again but I can't figure it out,
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:23:23 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:35:48 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:48:47 +0100
Bo Berglund bo.bergl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to specify things like the base
On 12/01/2010 12:58 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
No chance, I'd rather stop programming then using .net
+1000~
Why exactly would you prefer Java over CIL Pascal ?
(This of course should rather be handled in the other list...)
-Michael
--
On 12/1/2010 04:43, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 12:58 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
No chance, I'd rather stop programming then using .net
+1000~
Why exactly would you prefer Java over CIL Pascal ?
i'm not saying that... i'm saying that if i had to code in .net, that i
On 11/30/2010 02:52 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
FastCgiExternalServer D:/counte/verbruik/server -host 127.0.0.1:2015
-idle-timeout 30 -flush
AFAIK, fastCGI can use as well a TCP/IP socket as a pipe to do the
communication between the WebServer and the CGI program (not really a
On 12/01/2010 11:25 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
i'm not saying that... i'm saying that if i had to code in .net, that
i would quite coding... is that not what the first quote says?
There are things that can't be done by most traditional programming
frameworks but can be done by using either Java
2010/12/1 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
a Browser, ...). As we are in a Pascal oriented list, here, only CIL-Pascal
is relevant.
Actually this is a Lazarus list, so until FPC support CIL-pascal,
CIL-pascal is irrelevant here.
Vincent
--
___
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/30/2010 02:52 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
FastCgiExternalServer D:/counte/verbruik/server -host 127.0.0.1:2015
-idle-timeout 30 -flush
AFAIK, fastCGI can use as well a TCP/IP socket as a pipe to do the
communication between the
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 14:52 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:23 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:17 +0100, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 13:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:14 +0100, zeljko wrote:
I think we should not change a thing, until the problem is clear. Maybe
we can come up with some 'general'
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 14:23, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:17 +0100, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 01 December 2010 13:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:14 +0100, zeljko wrote:
I think we should not change a thing, until the problem is
On 12/01/2010 02:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
My FastCGI process is running as a windows service.
What is exactly the reason for this? Isn't it much easier when the
webserver starts (and stops, when it is not used) the cgi-application,
than doing this in a Windows service?
As creating
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is there somewhere I can hook into the TSQLQuery to (a) see exactly what
query was passed to the server (b) collect any error text and (c) get
execution timing?
a) Easiest is to use the database-client's log mechanism. (If there is
any). Else you can change the
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:43 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 02:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
My FastCGI process is running as a windows service.
What is exactly the reason for this? Isn't it much easier when the
webserver starts (and stops, when it is not used) the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
The can do the same thing:
By default, a fastcgi process is started by the webserver, passing it the
socket on which it should listen.
Most imporant difference is that mod_fastcgi is deprecated and doesn't
follow the FastCGI standard.
In
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/01/2010 02:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
My FastCGI process is running as a windows service.
What is exactly the reason for this? Isn't it much easier when the
webserver starts (and stops, when it is not used) the cgi-application,
than
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:12:00 +0100, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
I entered the following as the FPC compiler path:
$Env(FPCBASE)\2.4.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.exe
Should work now.
Now meaning what? Do I need to grab a newer version of lazarus and
rebuild it?
Yes.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is there somewhere I can hook into the TSQLQuery to (a) see exactly what
query was passed to the server (b) collect any error text and (c) get
execution timing?
a) Easiest is to use the database-client's log mechanism. (If there is
any). Else
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
The can do the same thing:
By default, a fastcgi process is started by the webserver, passing it the
socket on which it should listen.
Most imporant difference is
On 12/01/2010 03:52 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
But FastCGI is better, since it runs irrespective of the webserver.
And given that IIS is losing market share, I would never code exclusively
for IIS.
+1, but we did hear bad rumors about FCGI, so we used ISAPI :(.
-Michael
--
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:01 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is there somewhere I can hook into the TSQLQuery to (a) see exactly what
query was passed to the server (b) collect any error text and (c) get
execution timing?
a)
michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is there somewhere I can hook into the TSQLQuery to (a) see exactly what
query was passed to the server (b) collect any error text and (c) get
execution timing?
a) Easiest is to use the database-client's log
zeljko wrote:
Well, these are tne ansi/sql transacion isolation levels. do you know a
database which actually uses/supports these? (Except from Oracle)
Yes, PostgreSQL supports all of them.
With the same names? I know from some other db-servers, that they use
Yes.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
The can do the same thing:
By default, a fastcgi process is started by the webserver, passing it the
socket on which it
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I am a firm proponent of putting a unified mechanism for a) and c) in
TSQLQuery/TSQLConnection, and have, in fact, a patch ready for this
(it implements a simple event mechanism for the log).
That's a no-brainer. It could als use TCustomApplication.Log, if
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A week (or maybe 2) ago, I sent you a private mail about using select()
on the connection handle. This or the use of threads could
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:01 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Is there somewhere I can hook into the TSQLQuery to (a) see exactly what
query was passed to the server (b) collect any
Joost van der Sluis escreveu:
The FastCGI process should return how many connection and requests it
can handle. I'm not sure anymore if FastCGI of fpc can handle muliple
requests at a time. (It could, but some parts ahve been changed)
AFAIK at least Apache does not support multiplexing, so no
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A week (or maybe 2) ago, I sent you a private mail about using select()
on the connection
2010/12/1 michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A week (or maybe 2) ago, I sent you a private
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Also check this:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van
zel...@holobit.net wrote:
Quoting Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk:
Would it be possible to write a server-side PostgreSQL extension using
Lazarus, including friendly debugging?
Yes, feel free to do that :)
[GRIN] Actually, it was a serious question: can Lazarus debug a
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:05 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:51 +0100, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Also
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
2010/12/1 michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
[snip]
It never could. There is 1 connection, and all requests go through this
connection.
A
ExtPascal uses threads to handle multiple connections. I remember you
don't accept this way, right? BTW, what is there wrong if ExtPascal
uses threads?
I accept using threads, but not the way ExtPascal does it. Threads
should be
optional. In extpascal, the thread is equal to the session: if
40 matches
Mail list logo
