On Friday 31 of December 2010 04:12:19 steveg wrote:
Having a problem with moving from Ubuntu 9.10 to 10.10
( Lazarus 0.9.29 r28656 FPC 2.4.2 i386-linux-gtk 2 )
Running my app in 10.xx gives me a 'futex_wait_queue_me' 'waiting
channel' in system monitor and then just waits.
This same app
Hi
I was asked the title's question but I don't really know the answer.
So, compared to Tnt- unicode components for Delphi, or to the new Delphi
unicode support. How is it?
I know the FPC's UnicodeString type is not compatible with Delphi's but it is
close anyway, right (?)
Regards,
Juha
--
/snapshots/lazarus-0.9.31.28842-20101231.i386.deb.tar
64 bits:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/lazarus-0.9.31.28842-20101231.amd64.deb.tar
If there are no problems, I will merge the changes to the fixes_0_9_30
branch and update the lazarus-testing ubuntu repositiory for further
2010/12/31 Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com:
Hi
I was asked the title's question but I don't really know the answer.
So, compared to Tnt- unicode components for Delphi, or to the new Delphi
unicode support. How is it?
It is the same as the new Delphi unicode support, I think. All GUI
Vincent Snijders kirjoitti perjantai 31 joulukuu 2010 11:30:22:
It is the same as the new Delphi unicode support, I think. All GUI
components support unicode out of the box, it uses UTF8 encoded
strings.
AFAIK Delphi uses UTF16, so in that way it is different.
... so UTF8 is also unicode?
I
Juha Manninen wrote:
Vincent Snijders kirjoitti perjantai 31 joulukuu 2010 11:30:22:
It is the same as the new Delphi unicode support, I think. All GUI
components support unicode out of the box, it uses UTF8 encoded
strings.
AFAIK Delphi uses UTF16, so in that way it is different.
... so UTF8
Hi All,
Does AnchorDocking work in the IDE under GTK2/Linux or maybe I'm doing
something wrong?
Following the instructions in
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Anchor_Docking#Docking_in_the_IDE I get
only one Main IDE window wich has the height of it's caption bar.
If I try to make that window
On 29/12/10 19:08, Peter Williams wrote:
If those binaries are in your path then `which fp` and `which fpc`
should say where the programs are installed/located.
I don't know where they are installed/located. The software manager
application does not tell me. It simply installs them.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd Lazarus ground to
a halt after a week with a linking error (gld: cannot find
-lgdk_pixbuf), I suspect that Solaris only has this for gtk v2.
This is a FAQ
://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/
32 bits:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/lazarus-0.9.31.28842-20101231.i386.deb.tar
64 bits:
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/lazarus-0.9.31.28842-20101231.amd64.deb.tar
If there are no problems, I will merge the changes
Is the source code for it available?
The source for what exactly. It is all in svn and there are source
snapshots too,
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd Lazarus ground to
a halt after a week with a linking error (gld: cannot find
-lgdk_pixbuf), I suspect that Solaris only has this for gtk v2.
This is a FAQ
No it's not, I'm not asking a question.
I
On 31 December 2010 13:32, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.comwrote:
Is the source code for it available?
The source for what exactly. It is all in svn and there are source
snapshots too,
Vincent
--
I mean for the source for creating the .deb package itself.
I'm interested in
Dne 31.12.2010 15:44, Vincent Snijders napsal(a):
P.S. let's get back on the topic of this thread, did anybody test the
debs created by me?
VIncent
Hello Vincent,
I just installed these debs from your link:
lazarus-src-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_all.deb
2010/12/31 Petr Hlozek p...@ok2cqr.com:
Dne 31.12.2010 15:44, Vincent Snijders napsal(a):
I just installed these debs from your link:
lazarus-src-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_all.deb
lazarus-doc-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_all.deb
lazarus-ide-gtk2-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_amd64.deb
I think the main problem here how much time it takes a newcomer to ease
himself
into using a new set of tools, and it applies as much to a person moving to
git to
subversion (God forbid!! ) or vice versa.
Git is no harder to learn than any other software out there. The
problem is simply
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I think the main problem here how much time it takes a newcomer to ease himself
into using a new set of tools, and it applies as much to a person moving to git
to subversion (God forbid!! ) or vice versa.
Git is no harder to learn than any other software out there.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:52:36PM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Anyone want to respond with some basic semantics regarding signals and
socket handles under Linux/Unix? ?
In short: on unix, you're better off with select() and friends.
(which is basically what the main loop hooks in
(using
fp-units-rtl_2.4.2-0_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement fp-units-rtl ...
Selecting previously deselected package fp-utils.
Unpacking fp-utils (from fp-utils_2.4.2-0_i386.deb) ...
Preparing to replace lazarus-0.9.31 0.9.31-0-20101231 (using
lazarus-0.9.31_0.9.31-0-20101231_all.deb
Hi Graeme,
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:47:07 +0200
From: graemeg.li...@gmail.com
To: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] SVN user
2010/12/30 Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com:
I regret Graeme is trying to sell git once again - worse yet to a
I was
20 matches
Mail list logo
