an option to use
something like "New>ActiveX..."
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
B43AC6A3E}',
version 1.0,
helpstring 'FooClass Object' ];
But I don't know if is relevant... anyway.
So, how an new FPC programer should know these things to make a ActiveX?
I could be wrong, but I don't think just implement IDispatch is enough, do you?
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
__
d.
Do you know?
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
classes-objects
>
> I want to know is there any better way in Lazarus or what should I do?
Use interfaces instead of objects.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
mazing job, congratulations.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
ent (yet) but I work with MSSQL every day.
Would be great if we had such tool. Thanks.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
<mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> Then you organise it as follows:
>
> http://geldenhuys.co.uk/~graemeg/datamodule.png
:)
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus maili
/lcl/interfaces/carbon/carbonthemes.pas?root=lazarus=50303=50302=50303
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
<mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
> Nothing will change for with. But TRect may receive methods, and this may
> lead to hard-to-catch errors.
>
> Mattias did this for safety.
Thank you, Michael
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am 11.11.2015 18:58 schrieb "Marcos Douglas" <m...@delfire.net>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Many changes using this comment (in the subject) was made in LCL SVN,
>> chang
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Ondrej Pokorny <laza...@kluug.net> wrote:
>
> It was me. You are welcome ;)
Good job!
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mail
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Mattias Gaertner
<nc-gaert...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:43:23 -0200
> Marcos Douglas <m...@delfire.net> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> ...automatically, by set a property or use a method.
>> Is it possible?
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Mattias Gaertner
<nc-gaert...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 01:17:23 -0200
> Marcos Douglas <m...@delfire.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using TSynMemo and TSynXMLSyn.
>> How format a XML after load it?
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Anthony Walter wrote:
> uses
> Codebot.Text.Xml;
>
> function PrettyXml(const Xml: string): string;
> [...]
Thank you!
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
.
Press OK to ignore and risk data corruption.
Press Cancel to kill the program.
[OK] [Cancel]
---
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman
Hi,
I'm using TSynMemo and TSynXMLSyn.
How format a XML after load it?
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> [...]
> And before Graeme shows his image with the thousand components in a single
> datamodule here how it could look:
> http://mseide-msegui.sourceforge.net/pics/mseguirad.png
> ;-)
LOL!
One or two times on year I
out or only GUI specific code.
Possible, yes, but is more difficult to understand, maintenance is
compromised and hard to make tests.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
es bad habits (this is fact
> with the Delphi projects I've seen over the last 20+ years), and we all
> know bad habits die hard.
I agree.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
inimum
as possible. Is better to have 10 classes with one method each, than 1
classe with 10 methods.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
idnt wanted to put each control in one unit) my point
> is finding out browsing and editing big units.
As Martin and others said, the IDE will help you. Good luck.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazaru
C) to help me get more
>> familiar with however CodeTools is organized?
>
>
> FYI, that you don't develop it as well (see attached screenshots). I have to
> clean the source first, though.
I was waiting this too. Thank you!
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
__
a code completion list of units which start with "CompanyName."
+1
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
<mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
>
> That URL doesn't seem to be working. I get redirected to
> [http://www.finditez.com/]
The correct URL is http://www.codebot.org/live
, does anybody know if FreeSparta or CodeTyphon maybe
implemented this, and is something we can merge back into Lazarus?
+1
This is very useful.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http
is a namespace -- we know
this is true -- and this is not necessary... anyway.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:58 PM
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I have two independent
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Things start to get messy when you start thinking about functionality.
So that comes next, and the business classes reflect functionality, and
consequently more
the database for
production.
Hope this helps.
Don Ziesig, ROP (Really OLD Programmer);-)
+1
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
data. So, they are
completely different things.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
data and business objects,
so the above approach has always worked for me.
I'm tempted to say that working the other way round is bound to lead to
confusion.
Confusion... That depends if you work using a data-driven design or
behavior-driven design.
Marcos Douglas
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk wrote:
On 2015-04-29 11:17, Péter Gábor wrote:
unfortunately the cat on it is a Tiger not a
Cheetah :)
hehe... well spotted. ;)
=)
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus
there is ANY software that isn't still in
development. :-)
+1
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
read access
on a per-request basis? Why not simply publish (or mirror) it on a
public system like Github or SourceForge?
+1
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman
and they're
actually asking questions in the forums. I'll keep it this way for a while
longer.
When you posted about Bare.Game I sent a private mail to you but you
not answered. :)
Ok, I will send a private mail to get my account to your private repo
to Codebot.
...
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
make an effort to open it up as a new project (minus the parts I've
sold to third parties).
Good decision.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
. When do you will update it?
https://github.com/sysrpl/Codebot.Cross
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
(): theBaseImplemetationClass to
the
interface definition.
Which goes completely against the very purpose of interfaces.
If you need this, you should not be using interfaces to begin with.
The only possible excuse is an external requirement to use interfaces.
+1
Marcos Douglas
we work using
interfaces, is using variables that have the type of these interfaces.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
type.
Regards,
Ara
So work using objects directly.
Why do you want to use interfaces if you will use casting for a concrete class?
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
, getlazarus.org,
etc -- just think if is better use stable versions.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
this message?
Lazarus 1.5 r47948M FPC 2.6.5 i386-win32-win32/win64
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:02:08 -0300
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
[...]
No. Exception could be raised, but FPCUnit will catch.
Without debug-info these exception not show a message. But I need to
see
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:26 PM, martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 23/02/15 17:16, Marcos Douglas wrote:
I need for project, not globally. If this option exists in Build modes...
for now you should be able to disable it. ( that option will stay)
then we need to find ways to deal with all
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:26:17 -0300
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
[...]
I will test but could not be as before or, better, why not show this
message only if there are breakpoints marked?
Stopping
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:02:08 -0300
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
[...]
Just to be sure: This is about your app (intentionally) not having
FPC_RAISEEXCEPTION?
There is no other breakpoint (check
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:53 PM, martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 23/02/15 15:02, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:44 AM, martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
there is an option in the debugger properties (the property grid in the
debugger options
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:04 PM, martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 23/02/15 16:26, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:53 PM, martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 23/02/15 15:02, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Sorry my fault, the option wasnt published.
I committed that, with added
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:14 PM, martin laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 23/02/15 16:58, Marcos Douglas wrote
I don't want to use breakpoint...
but in tools option debugger gdb is selected. So the IDE assumes you
want to debug.
Yet I agree this option is global, not suitable for being
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:46:42 -0300
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:02:08 -0300
Marcos Douglas
that only if the program is local.
+1
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
do not put a Rx prefix in all components?
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
this thread at the forum.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 01:04:22AM -0200, Marcos Douglas wrote:
This is totally new for me. I have used interfaces a lot, and while I had
trouble from time to time, I haven't really encountered these.
New? What do
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 07:51:25PM -0200, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Delphi. As a first try I remove the const, in case of unexpected trouble.
Delphi and FPC have problems with refcounting -- but I'm referring
only
-- but I'm referring
only interfaces.
Circular references is a big problem too.
This link could help:
http://blog.synopse.info/post/2012/06/18/Circular-reference-and-zeroing-weak-pointers
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus
want,
just implement the interfaces.
The classes are sealed to encourage decorator pattern, not inheritance.
Improvements will come and comments are welcome. Thank you.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus
idea.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Larry Dalton larrydalto...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone successfully using Lazarus with .dbf files connected by ODBC?
Sent from my iPhone
I'm using TDbf component. Works fine.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Reimar Grabowski reimg...@web.de wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:26:32 -0300
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Hi,
Take a look in Greyhound project: https://github.com/mdbs99/Greyhound
I did and could not see how it helps.
It has a code that working
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:26:32 -0300
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Hi,
Take a look in Greyhound project: https://github.com/mdbs99/Greyhound
I did
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:26:32
.
If you do not put the value, automatically, on register that you
included... what the point?
IMHO this is not a general code. The user can implements the same but
he will need to put the value on record... manually.
The code I showed before works in any DMBS. Just test it.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:15 AM
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Marcos Douglas wrote:
By the very nature of the problem: GetLastAutoIncValue simply cannot be
implemented in general.
In firebird, postgres, these values are generated using
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Your remarks sound like maybe you don't understand/know exactly what
RETURNING does ?
It was invented exactly to deal with such things.
AFAIK RETURNING is a SQL
an example using last id:
https://github.com/mdbs99/Greyhound/blob/master/test/ghsqltest.pas#L285
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net hat am 21. Oktober 2014 um 03:32
geschrieben:
[...]
I did:
1- make distclean in FPC 2.6.5
2- make distclean in Laz
Use make clean all at 2 to build all common tools .
Ok
: DEBUGEND_DBF_LANG
lazarus.pp(142,1) Error: Undefined symbol: DEBUGINFO_DBF_IDXCUR
lazarus.pp(142,1) Error: Undefined symbol: DEBUGSTART_DBF_IDXCUR
lazarus.pp(142,1) Error: Undefined symbol: DEBUGEND_DBF_IDXCUR
--
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Marcos Douglas m...@delfire.net wrote:
Hi,
I got these errors below when the compiler is __linking__ the IDE.
Lazarus 1.3 rev 46626 FPC 2.6.5 i386-win32-win32/win64
Build IDE: Exit code 2, Errors: 48
lazarus.pp(142,1) Error: Undefined symbol
menu:
Source / Refactoring / Abstract Methods
The appearing dialog will show the missing methods of IUnknown and with
a further click it creates empty methods.
Great!
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
WOW! Great job!!
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Martin Frb laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 23/04/2014 19:29, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Martin Frb laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 18/04/2014 23:48, Martin Frb wrote:
On 18/04/2014 17:09, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Martin Frb laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 18/04/2014 23:48, Martin Frb wrote:
On 18/04/2014 17:09, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Martin Frb laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/GDB_Debugger_Tips
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Martin Frb laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 17/04/2014 04:46, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FPC 2.6.5 (fixes_2_6) and Lazarus trunk on Windows.
The GDB is updated too, here:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/binaries/i386-win32/gdb
I run my program
debugging may prove unreliable.
Could you help me?
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Joao Morais l...@joaomorais.com.br wrote:
Em 17/03/14 16:28, Marcos Douglas escreveu:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Joao Morais l...@joaomorais.com.br wrote:
Em 15/03/14 22:47, Marcos Douglas escreveu:
So, what the best way to substitute PostMessage
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joao Morais l...@joaomorais.com.br wrote:
Em 18/03/14 10:47, Marcos Douglas escreveu:
a form needs to notify many windows
using asynchronous messages. PostMessage do that but some programmers
say this is an old Windowish approach so, I'm searching another
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Marcos Douglas schrieb:
The requisites isn't a secret: a form needs to notify many windows
using asynchronous messages. PostMessage do that but some programmers
say this is an old Windowish approach so, I'm
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 03/16/2014 02:47 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Like all Windows programmer, I use PostMessage/SendMessage a lot.
Lazarus team has created Application.QueueAsyncCall method to
substitute the (old) Windowish method todo
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 03/17/2014 01:31 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Yes, but the QueueAsyncCall needs to know what procedure to call for a
especific object (instance)
I don't understand.
The definition of the function (I use
TThread.Queue is new, but I never used... maybe you can explain me
what advantages, please.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
can free
itself and return to the caller of the function just as if this function
would be another destructor.
Could you send the sources of this test?
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 03/17/2014 05:42 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Could you send the sources of this test?
I could if you are interested.
This is a testing project I did for the development of Widget Types (with
and without GUI
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Joao Morais l...@joaomorais.com.br wrote:
Em 15/03/14 22:47, Marcos Douglas escreveu:
So, what the best way to substitute PostMessage?
Maybe using QueueAsyncCall + IFPObserved/IFPObserver?
Have you tried decoupling your classes with interfaces?
I thought
?
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
tied tp the calling process
(thread ?).
There will be no problems if the DLL is thread-safe, ie, is better not
use global variables in the DLL.
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http
/download-a-file-from-internet-programatically-with-an-progress-event-using-delph
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13641055/download-file-progressively-using-tidhttp
http://goo.gl/30oXdu
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de wrote:
On 01/17/2014 01:25 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
is better not use global variables in the DLL.
Of course I agree.
A reason for using global variables in a DLL might be to access that value
as well in the DLL
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Marcos Douglas wrote:
But why do you need a global var in the DLL? IMHO (and for many
programmers around the world), global var is not good, even in the
application code.
Although I think
if someone is working on
the same bug?
Thank you.
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Martin Frb laza...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 05/01/2014 15:33, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if there is some mechanism in Bugtracker, for developers who
are not part of Lazarus core, know if has somebody is working (Lazarus
developer or not) in some bug
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 05.01.2014 16:33, Marcos Douglas wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if there is some mechanism in Bugtracker, for developers who
are not part of Lazarus core, know if has somebody is working (Lazarus
developer or not) in some
Happy new year from Brasil 00:23.
Marcos Douglas
Em 31/12/2013 22:16, Richard Mace richard.m...@gmail.com escreveu:
Same from me 00:14 from UK :)
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http
companies opted to rewrite there Delphi projects in C# and Java...
I agree. I see this here in Brazil too.
So, if the companies prefer to rewrite everything to another language,
this is another prove that people do not want compatibility with
Delphi (so much).
Regards,
Marcos Douglas
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Martin Schreiber mse00...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 27 December 2013 21:10:39 Marcos Douglas wrote:
Resume:
MSElang do no allow to cancatenate different string types (must be
explicitely converted)
Correct.
and the RTL does not will use string8.
Wrong
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Florian Klämpfl
flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Am 28.12.2013 13:02, schrieb Marcos Douglas:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.org
wrote:
Am 28.12.2013 11:01, schrieb Marcos Douglas:
[...]
So, if the companies prefer
was that they like Pascal as an easy to learn and
mantain language then they will invest into migration even
if not all parts are the identical to Delphi.
Just the opposite:
They may like that not all misconcepts are repeated in
FPC/Lazarus and they may like that it is open source.
+1
Marcos
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013, Marcos Douglas wrote:
The close coupling of compiler and framework is necessary for a
commercial
software producer in order to optimize profit, opensource development
does
not need
1 - 100 of 697 matches
Mail list logo