michael.vancann...@wisa.be schrieb:
There is nothing magic with layout managers, they have to do nothing
but arrange their child controls, and to report the minimal and
desired sizes to their parent (with AutoSize). Every docking manager
already is a layout manager for its site, and its
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
The project is further badly hindered by the stubborn refusal of the
designers to implement Layout Managers.
I'm not too deep into the subject, but layout managers are more something of
ownerdrawn environments, and as such that is not compatible with the
projects
Darius Blaszyk schrieb:
- implement a basic layout manager. While you're at it could you also
integrate it with the design editor? It will make our lives more easy.
There exist already a couple of layout managers in the LCL, but they are
totally isolated. It had been easy with the recent
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Darius Blaszyk schrieb:
- implement a basic layout manager. While you're at it could you also
integrate it with the design editor? It will make our lives more easy.
There exist already a couple of layout managers in the LCL, but they are
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:31:35PM +0100, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
designers to implement Layout Managers.
I'm not too deep into the subject, but layout managers are more something of
ownerdrawn environments, and as such that is not compatible with the
projects stated goal of using
On 20 December 2010 18:31, Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
I'm not too deep into the subject, but layout managers are more something
of
ownerdrawn environments, and as such that is not compatible with the
projects stated goal of using native
On 21 December 2010 21:16, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Why should a layout manager ever require ownerdraw?
How can you guarantee any consistent positioning otherwise?
Positioning a component and setting it's bounds (width, height) in
definitely not ownerdrawn. As for as I know
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:15:09AM -0800, Brian Prentice wrote:
That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this
project is such a miserable failure. All formal releases should be
stable.
I would label such first release a beta, but the whole lazarus formally
still has
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
What is needed is a comprehensive test suit that covers all features of
Lazarus.
Testsuites are the favourite knee-jerk solution for stability problems, but
it is a lot harder if the project is visual, and/or the spec is constantly
evolving.
I
On 20/12/10 09:44, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Lazarus IMHO has the best testsuite ever: An active community that
points out bugs as soon as they pop up.
And this is (for me, at least) a good sign that the project is not a
miserable failure. There is a lot of activity in the bug tracker, and
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:14, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I didn't pay attention on this the first time, but: the buttons no longer
display the images associated with the modal results when a questiondialog
is used:
- start ide
- Start new
2010/12/18 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
To Vincent,
This is the exact thing I am talking about. Saying a stable release
is a few weeks away, things like this should not be happening in
Trunk. The mailing list is full of such reports.
I guess I am eager to release when it is
On Sunday 19 December 2010 14:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:14, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I didn't pay attention on this the first time, but: the buttons no
longer display the images associated with the modal
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Sunday 19 December 2010 14:12, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:14, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I didn't pay attention on this the first time, but: the buttons no
longer display the
Vincent,
That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this project
is such a miserable failure. All formal releases should be stable. What is
needed is a comprehensive test suit that covers all features of Lazarus. This
test software should be used for regression
2010/12/19 Brian Prentice bprent...@webenet.net:
Vincent,
That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this
project is such a miserable failure. All formal releases should be stable.
What is needed is a comprehensive test suit that covers all features of
Lazarus.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Brian Prentice bprent...@webenet.netwrote:
Vincent,
That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this
project is such a miserable failure. All formal releases should be stable.
Brian, calm down, you have a moral right to have such
Hi Brian,
It's not my thing normally to reply to rants, but I simply could not
resist. From time to time threads lead to discussions where people
express their grief with Lazarus (to say it mildly). Perhaps we should
create a FAQ on this ;) But to your remarks I can say only this;
If you have
On 19/12/2010 19:15, Brian Prentice wrote:
Vincent,
That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this project
is such a miserable failure. All formal releases should be stable. What is
In my opinion, at best this statement was out of context.
It is not unawareness or
On 18 December 2010 22:56, Sven Barth wrote:
When they shouldn't happen in trunk then where do you propose them to
happen?
Exactly my point. Trunk is UNSTABLE - ALWAYS. So how can Vincent or
any other developer think of cutting a stable release directly from
Trunk. There is never a
On 19 December 2010 17:06, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
pls. tell that to Graeme ;)
You missed the point I was trying to make Zeljko.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
2010/12/19 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
On 18 December 2010 22:56, Sven Barth wrote:
When they shouldn't happen in trunk then where do you propose them to
happen?
Exactly my point. Trunk is UNSTABLE - ALWAYS. So how can Vincent or
any other developer think of cutting a stable
On 19 December 2010 19:15, Brian Prentice bprent...@webenet.net wrote:
Vincent,
That is a ridiculous statement and is one of the main reasons why this
project is such a
miserable failure.
You've failed to explain this premise. How have you come to the
conclusion that this project is a
On 19.12.2010 21:21, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
And no, I won't take the developer him-/herself should test it good enough
Excuse me, but that should happen without saying. If you don't, then
something major is wrong in your work process!
I'm not saying that the developer should test nothing
On Sunday 19 December 2010 22:07, Sven Barth wrote:
programs for such things could be written... but here the same problem
applies as in every open source project: someone has to do it...
+1
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:14, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I didn't pay attention on this the first time, but: the buttons no longer
display the images associated with the modal results when a questiondialog
is used:
- start ide
- Start new project
- Move main form
Close IDE.
On 12/18/2010 07:32 PM, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:14, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I didn't pay attention on this the first time, but: the buttons no longer
display the images associated with the modal results when a questiondialog
is used:
- start ide
- Start new
To Vincent,
This is the exact thing I am talking about. Saying a stable release
is a few weeks away, things like this should not be happening in
Trunk. The mailing list is full of such reports.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 15 December 2010 11:34, michael.vancann...@ wrote:
Hi,
I just
On 18.12.2010 21:38, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
To Vincent,
This is the exact thing I am talking about. Saying a stable release
is a few weeks away, things like this should not be happening in
Trunk. The mailing list is full of such reports.
When they shouldn't happen in trunk then where do
Hi,
I just upgraded to revision 28712 of Lazarus, and really almost all message dialogs
are messed up. Sometimes, the button captions make no sense whatsoever.
Every message (or question) dialog I encountered seems affected by this.
Just one example, after execution:
Execution stopped: Yes
15.12.2010 16:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I just upgraded to revision 28712 of Lazarus, and really almost all
message dialogs are messed up. Sometimes, the button captions make no
sense whatsoever. Every message (or question) dialog I encountered seems
affected by this.
Just one
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Paul Ishenin wrote:
15.12.2010 16:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
I just upgraded to revision 28712 of Lazarus, and really almost all
message dialogs are messed up. Sometimes, the button captions make no
sense whatsoever. Every message (or question) dialog I
I can reproduce in gtk 2 / x86
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
15.12.2010 16:41, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Linux 64-bit, GTK 2
But I would be very surprised if it was widget set dependent ?
Not long ago we rewrote QuestionDlg function to use native dialog
function when possible (to make IDE and other LCL applications look more
standard). Of
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Paul Ishenin wrote:
15.12.2010 16:41, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Linux 64-bit, GTK 2
But I would be very surprised if it was widget set dependent ?
Not long ago we rewrote QuestionDlg function to use native dialog function
when possible (to make IDE and other
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded to revision 28712 of Lazarus, and really almost all message
dialogs are messed up. Sometimes, the button captions make no sense
whatsoever. Every message (or question) dialog I encountered seems
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:34, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded to revision 28712 of Lazarus, and really almost all message
dialogs are messed up. Sometimes, the button captions make no sense
whatsoever. Every message (or
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 16:00, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
When project information file changes:
Project changed on disk
The project information file sopmefile has changed on disk.
Ignore yes
No question, and 'Ignore', 'yes'.
ahhhButtons[].Caption should be used in
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 16:00, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
When project information file changes:
Project changed on disk
The project information file sopmefile has changed on disk.
Ignore yes
No question, and 'Ignore', 'yes'.
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 16:00, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
When project information file changes:
Project changed on disk
The project information file sopmefile has changed on disk.
Ignore
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:14, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, zeljko wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 16:00, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
When project information file changes:
Project changed on disk
41 matches
Mail list logo
