Il 12/02/2016 02:41, Martin Frb ha scritto:
Actual hiding is more work, because it needs to shift x positions in
some line. Probably needs big changes. Though readonly may be doable.
IMHO such a feature would be typically used to read and understand code,
therefore read-only is not only
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Martin Frb wrote:
On 11/02/2016 23:54, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
By this I mean a view of a unit as the compiler will see it:
- Correct include files included
This has been long on the list. But still no in the doing.
Ignoring:
- any high/low-light or other markup
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:54:38 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
[...]
By this I mean a view of a unit as the compiler will see it:
- Correct include files included
- IFDefs properly resolved.
The IDE groks include
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:25:11 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>[...]
> > What about include files used twice in a unit?
>
> Yes, that happens in the RTL as a kind of poor-mans generics.
That's no problem when the file compiles. But while typing a directive
the
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:25:11 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
[...]
What about include files used twice in a unit?
Yes, that happens in the RTL as a kind of poor-mans generics.
That's no problem when the file
On 12/02/2016 12:45, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Well, if it is on the todo list, I don't need to file a feature
request ;)
Not really on todo, only remembered as being wanted.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 12/02/2016 16:10, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Martin Frb wrote:
Not really on todo, only remembered as being wanted.
Should I file a request anyway or has memory been sufficiently
refreshed ?
I had not yet read Mattias will go for a different approach solving it.
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Martin Frb wrote:
On 12/02/2016 12:45, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Well, if it is on the todo list, I don't need to file a feature request ;)
Not really on todo, only remembered as being wanted.
Should I file a request anyway or has memory been sufficiently refreshed
Hi,
I've been thinking about a recent problem posed by Anthony Walter on the
fpc-pascal
mailing list: the abundant use of include files and IFDEFS and the ensuing
lack of 'overview'.
So I asked myself: what if we somehow "invert" the problem ?
How hard would it be to create a 'resolved view'
On 11/02/2016 23:54, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
By this I mean a view of a unit as the compiler will see it:
- Correct include files included
This has been long on the list. But still no in the doing.
Ignoring:
- any high/low-light or other markup to indicate the fact that the text
comes
10 matches
Mail list logo