Hello Michael,
Michael Schnell wrote:
>On Linux, fpGUI can be configured to use either "GDI" or "X11" as
>"fpGUI Platform". So it might be doable to have fpGUI use DirectX as
>a platform.
Under Linux, then "GDI" makes no sense - but then I didn't follow this
whole thread. The latest development v
On Monday 19 October 2015 10:00:33 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Michael Schnell wrote:
> > On 10/16/2015 03:00 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >> So, that is not the GDI winapi...
> >
> > Obviously.So a Delphi program never will show a a Form.
> >
> > But with Lazarus, the "fp
Am 19.10.2015 09:43 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 10/16/2015 03:00 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>
>> So, that is not the GDI winapi...
>>
> Obviously.So a Delphi program never will show a a Form.
>
> But with Lazarus, the "fpGUI" and "Custom Drawn" widget sets should work,
as - AFAIK -
On 10/19/2015 10:00 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
As far as I know, fpGUI works on GDI.
I suppose you are right. I did not re-check in Windows, as I don't use
Lazarus on windows right now, but maybe erroneously just used my remote
memory.
Rephrasing:
On Linux, fpGUI can be configured t
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 10/16/2015 03:00 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
So, that is not the GDI winapi...
Obviously.So a Delphi program never will show a a Form.
But with Lazarus, the "fpGUI" and "Custom Drawn" widget sets should work, as
- AFAIK - they can be conf
On 10/16/2015 03:00 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
So, that is not the GDI winapi...
Obviously.So a Delphi program never will show a a Form.
But with Lazarus, the "fpGUI" and "Custom Drawn" widget sets should
work, as - AFAIK - they can be configured to use DirectX.
-> Graeme can you comm
Am 16.10.2015 15:22 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
> Maybe on ARM the WinCE application type might work ???
I doubt very much that Microsoft ported the WinCE API to their NT based
system and yes, they use very different libraries.
Regards,
Sven
--
___
Laza
On 10/16/2015 03:00 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
So, that is not the GDI winapi...
I understand that it is meant as a replacement for WinCE (and of course
to fight Linux), but not as a competitor for Desktop Windows.
But happily, Delphi (and very likely Windows-fpc-) programs will run.
Seem
On 10/16/2015 02:51 PM, Žilvinas Ledas wrote:
True “console” apps aren’t really going to be supported for the IoT
core OS, headless or not. You can still deploy and run a standard
win32 console app here, it just won’t be connected to any on-device
console. When running headless you should jus
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Žilvinas Ledas wrote:
On 2015-10-16 15:28, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What about Win 10 IOT Core for ARM ? I suppose that some work needs
to be
done to support Win 10 IOT Core on ARM.
It depends on whether normal WinAPI programs will work there.
I thought not?
On 2015-10-16 15:28, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What about Win 10 IOT Core for ARM ? I suppose that some work needs
to be
done to support Win 10 IOT Core on ARM.
It depends on whether normal WinAPI programs will work there.
I thought not?
According to https://ms-iot.github.io/content/e
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 16.10.2015 09:45 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
(avoiding to hitchhike the other thread))
On 10/16/2015 07:32 AM, LacaK wrote:
Same in our company. We use Motorola mobile computers with WinCE 5 and
WinCE6 and we compile native applications for them.
Am 16.10.2015 09:45 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> (avoiding to hitchhike the other thread))
>
> On 10/16/2015 07:32 AM, LacaK wrote:
>>
>> Same in our company. We use Motorola mobile computers with WinCE 5 and
WinCE6 and we compile native applications for them.
>> (So WinCE support is for us very
(avoiding to hitchhike the other thread))
On 10/16/2015 07:32 AM, LacaK wrote:
Same in our company. We use Motorola mobile computers with WinCE 5 and
WinCE6 and we compile native applications for them.
(So WinCE support is for us very important)
-Laco.
I understand that Microsoft on the long
14 matches
Mail list logo
