Alex Smirnov schreef:
Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
This is because a SECOND exception is raised somewhere which hides your first
exception. It means there is a place where you do not take into account that
an exception may occur ?
(or there is an error in the Lazarus exception handling
Rod schrieb:
Would like to see daily Lazarus Win64 snapshots on
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lazarus/
Lazarus people refused to do so because there is no native build machine
which could do it. Non native builds have the disadvantage that nobody
notices if even the compiler is broken.
Here's a patch for the readme file located at lcl\widgetset.
The patch fixes a few spelling errors.
Darius
readme.zip.remove
Description: Binary data
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:18:59AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:41:42 +0200
Borut Maricic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-10-14 at 04:06,
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 10/13/06, Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Alex Smirnov wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt ?:
This is because a SECOND exception is raised somewhere which hides your
first exception. It means there is a place where you do not take into
account that an exception may occur ?
(or there is an error in the
interesting articles about strings under windows
,discussing also about BSTR (not refcounted) strings,
afair win32 and win64 fpc rtl moved to BSTR (not sure)
http://www.codeproject.com/string/cppstringguide1.asp
and
http://www.codeproject.com/string/cppstringguide2.asp?print=true
may be it
