Marc Weustink schrieb:
Marc Weustink wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports,
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Marc Weustink wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If
Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit:
From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess
there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling.
Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility?
(otherwise I think old style
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit:
From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess
there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling.
Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility?
(otherwise I
Thank you for the information :)
Ido
On Jan 20, 2008 10:12 PM, Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
En/na ik ha escrit:
For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ?
oabi (I don't think that's the proper definition, anyway o stands for
old) is the previous arm binary
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
hmm... current
Marc Weustink wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
Marc Weustink wrote:
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Marc Weustink wrote:
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Great!
(not that I grasp the full implications of oabi vs. eabi, but I'd like
to make some experiment with my n800, which is an eabi system).
Bye
--
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
Great!
(not that I grasp the full
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and I also mentioned
Lazarus :)).
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and I also mentioned
13 matches
Mail list logo
