Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-08 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
Guys, just reminding that it would be good if everyone posts here about this bounty: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Bounties I also put there a small list of indispensable bug fixes. Others can add more. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-08 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 10/31/06, Burkhard Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I allredy regret my mail. While I am really interested in seeing proper GTK2 support + I am really willing to pay for that, I admit that there are some problems with this bounty offer: * who decides, if the goal is reached That's why it

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-01 Thread zeljko
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1. more $500 for Qt from me _ To unsubscribe:

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-01 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 11/1/06, zeljko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1.more $500 for Qt from me Please guys, organize this in this

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-01 Thread johnf
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 04:57, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: On 11/1/06, zeljko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-01 Thread Vincent Snijders
johnf schreef: On Wednesday 01 November 2006 04:57, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: On 11/1/06, zeljko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-11-01 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 01/11/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh really ? well, what are you waiting for then ? Get to work and grab that bounty... ;-) Talking bounties: Did you already get the last bounty ? Form Inheritance ? Cause I'm really waiting for that one... (one of these things which I

[lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread johnf
I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1. So what I'm saying is the IDE should be able to run using either QT or GTK2 and programs compiled as either QT or GTK2 must run. It does not have to be both -

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread A.J. Venter
I will add another 100USD to the bounty. That's 300USD so far in other words :) A.J. On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1. So what I'm saying is the

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Matt Henley
I would add another US$100, tired of GTK1 Matt Henley On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will add another 100USD to the bounty. That's 300USD so far in other words :) A.J. On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Mattias Gaertner
That's very noble of you. But also very vague. The gtk2 will never run on the level of gtk1. Most things can and will be done better, some things like speed and library stability can not be reached. The gtk1 lacks some features and has some bugs. The gtk2 has other bugs. IMHO the gtk1 lacks too

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread johnf
I'm not trying to be vague. I just want either GTK2 or QT to work. If there are required difference - so be it. If a combobox requires different parameters OK. John On Tuesday 31 October 2006 09:46, Mattias Gaertner wrote: That's very noble of you. But also very vague. The gtk2 will

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Oro06
Alexsander Rosa wrote: It's over US$ 500 now. A Lazarus Foundation is now required and 50% (minimum) sent back to FPC Foundation :-) _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Vincent Snijders
johnf schreef: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current level Lazarus runs today with GTK1. So what I'm saying is the IDE should be able to run using either QT or GTK2 and programs compiled as either QT or GTK2 must run. It does not

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Alexsander Rosa
It's over US$ 500 now. 2006/10/31, Burkhard Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 18:23 schrieb A.J. Venter: I will add another 100USD to the bounty. That's 300USD so far in other words :) A.J. On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread A.J. Venter
If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying that gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it? IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support? For starters: menu images and listview images. A.J. -- 80% Of a hardware engineer's job is application of the uncertainty

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Burkhard Carstens
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 18:23 schrieb A.J. Venter: I will add another 100USD to the bounty. That's 300USD so far in other words :) A.J. On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:19, johnf wrote: I will offer $200.00 US to anyone that delivers Lazarus running either QT or GTK2 at the current

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0200 A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I were to claim the bounty with the svn version of today, saying that gtk2 is as good as gtk1, why would you deny it? IOW, what is still missing in the gtk2 support? For starters: menu images and listview images.

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually though -for me personally, QT would be a more important - once KDE4 is out, openlab WILL switch, and nothing would make me happier than to migrate wole, olad and the installer to QT instead - maximum integration. I donĀ“t want to rain

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote: That's very noble of you. But also very vague. The gtk2 will never run on the level of gtk1. Most things can and will be done better, some things like

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:13 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote: That's very noble of you. But also very vague. The gtk2 will never run on the level of gtk1.

Re: [lazarus] a bounty

2006-10-31 Thread Cesar Romero
gtk2 uses pango which is a rather high level font rendering lib. gtk1 was almost X level and therefore fast but lacks a lot of unicode specials. OTOH SynEdit needs some fast and simple text functions. Maybe cairo is the solution. Sebastian is already working on this. Just wondering, how is