Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-28 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 6/28/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, I saw what I did wrong. I added the SynEdit requirement to my > own unit test project, instead of to the fpcUnit GUI Runner package. > > I submitted another patch (part 3) which should be applied after the > previous two to get it

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 2)

2006-06-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:36:48 +0200 "Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > [Part 2 of 2] > Not sure if I needed to send this file - I believe it gets generated > automatically. Correct. I added the missing files to the package. Mattias > It is the .lrs file of fpcunit. I at

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:59:51 +0200 "Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dean, > > Okay, I saw what I did wrong. I added the SynEdit requirement to my > own unit test project, instead of to the fpcUnit GUI Runner package. > > I submitted another patch (part 3) which should be appl

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:32:48 +0200 "Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Attached is a patch for /components/fpcunit. The patch should be > applied from the root Lazarus directory. > > It is a combined patch (a few files have changes). > > Change: > * A new unit has been adde

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-27 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Is this for trying to commit the changes to SubVersion? I always work against the latest SubVersion revision... Changes are on my other development PC, so will only be able to send it to you later. Regards, - Graeme - On 6/27/06, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Won't apply onto 0.9.15.

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-27 Thread Al Boldi
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Attached is a patch for /components/fpcunit. The patch should be > applied from the root Lazarus directory. > > It is a combined patch (a few files have changes). Won't apply onto 0.9.15. Can you send the changed files in full? Thanks! -- Al

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-26 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi Dean, Okay, I saw what I did wrong. I added the SynEdit requirement to my own unit test project, instead of to the fpcUnit GUI Runner package. I submitted another patch (part 3) which should be applied after the previous two to get it all sorted. Regards, - Graeme - On 6/26/06, Graeme Ge

[lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 3)

2006-06-26 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Attached is a extra patch which should be applied after parts 1 and 2. It adds synedit as a required package in fpcunittestrunner.lpk Regards, - Graeme - -- There's no place like 127.0.0.1 Index: components/fpcunit/fpcunittestrunner.lpk =

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-26 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 6/26/06, Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Incorporated Darius's patch as well which adds a Synedit XML Highlighter. I would also add synedit as a required package in fpcunittestrunner.lpk Umm, I thought I did do that? Will check again. Regards, - Graeme - -- There's no place li

Re: [lazarus] fpcunit - patch (part 1)

2006-06-26 Thread Dean Zobec
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi > > Attached is a patch for /components/fpcunit. The patch should be > applied from the root Lazarus directory. > > It is a combined patch (a few files have changes). > > Change: > * A new unit has been added (xmlreporter.pas). It is a XML test > listener based on

Re: [lazarus] fpcUnit patch

2006-05-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 17 May 2006 13:20:16 +0200 "Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Please find attached another contribution for the fpcUnit users. > Changes apply to the components/fpcunit directory. This patch needs > to be applied from the root Lazarus directory. > > Fixes: > * Re

RE: [lazarus] fpcUnit patch

2006-05-17 Thread William Cairns
Subject: Re: [lazarus] fpcUnit patch Hi, I double checked, this isn't my ISP. It seems to be some IT company in South Africa. I guess it must be someone that is part of the mailing list and their email provider doesn't like attachments. Still an idiotic way of trying to prevent vi

Re: [lazarus] fpcUnit patch

2006-05-17 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
1 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Recipient:lazarus@miraclec.com; Subject:[lazarus] fpcUnit patch Attachment name:fpcunit.patch.zip --- END On 17/05/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Who send that message, you receiving e

Re: [lazarus] fpcUnit patch

2006-05-17 Thread Vincent Snijders
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef: My previous post came back with a message saying that the .zip extention is a illegal attachment and was blocked (how stupid is that!). Here is the message again, with the attachment renamed. Please change it to .zip when saving it to disk. Who send that message, yo

[lazarus] fpcUnit patch

2006-05-17 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
My previous post came back with a message saying that the .zip extention is a illegal attachment and was blocked (how stupid is that!). Here is the message again, with the attachment renamed. Please change it to .zip when saving it to disk. Graeme. --- Hi, Please find attac