Paul Ishenin schreef:
Bee пишет:
Please suggest
I got the list from Change Logs. I suggest these:
0008029: [Database] Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Z don't work in a TDBMemo
0010248: [IDE] Some icons aren't showed into the component palette
iirc all graphic issues I want to merge into stable branch are th
Bee пишет:
Please suggest
I got the list from Change Logs. I suggest these:
0008029: [Database] Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Z don't work in a TDBMemo
0010248: [IDE] Some icons aren't showed into the component palette
iirc all graphic issues I want to merge into stable branch are there
0010198: [LCL] OnM
Please suggest
I got the list from Change Logs. I suggest these:
0008029: [Database] Ctrl+C and Ctrl+Z don't work in a TDBMemo
0010248: [IDE] Some icons aren't showed into the component palette
0010198: [LCL] OnMouseWheel WheelDelta is opposite in sign for Win32 and
GTK2
0010178: [LCL] Wrong
Bee wrote:
Correct. The fixes branch, in this moment contains 0.9.24 (r. 12749 in
trunk branch, 12771 in the fixes branch, but the only change is making
it 0.9.24.1) + patches 12756, 12757 12760 12762 12797 12816 12831
12825 12946 from trunk. (I hope I didn't mistype too many, but an svn
log -
Correct. The fixes branch, in this moment contains 0.9.24 (r. 12749 in
trunk branch, 12771 in the fixes branch, but the only change is making
it 0.9.24.1) + patches 12756, 12757 12760 12762 12797 12816 12831 12825
12946 from trunk. (I hope I didn't mistype too many, but an svn log -r
12749:HEAD
Bee ha scritto:
When a tag (or branch) is made, this action itself also gets a
revision nr. Therefore a tag/branch starts with a different revision,
but can be based on the same trunk revision.
So, a different rev number doesn't mean different codes? I mean between
tags (9.24) and the fixes b
When a tag (or branch) is made, this action itself also gets a revision
nr. Therefore a tag/branch starts with a different revision, but can be
based on the same trunk revision.
So, a different rev number doesn't mean different codes? I mean between
tags (9.24) and the fixes branch.
-Bee-
h
Bee wrote:
The release was built with rev 12749. The new patches are not
included.
Is 9.24 release is taken from tags folder? I saw it with rev 12750. And
I saw the fixes branch is on rev 12958. I look them in laz's svn. Am I
correct? Or any other repository that I don't know?
in svn are 3
The release was built with rev 12749. The new patches are not
included.
Is 9.24 release is taken from tags folder? I saw it with rev 12750. And
I saw the fixes branch is on rev 12958. I look them in laz's svn. Am I
correct? Or any other repository that I don't know?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:19:19 +0700
Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Start using it right now at your own risk (the updates of two
> > weeks ago have been tested, the last ones not yet) and participate
> > to the fixes branch testing.
>
> Never mind the risk, I knew about it since the beginni
1) Start using it right now at your own risk (the updates of two weeks
ago have been tested, the last ones not yet) and participate to the
fixes branch testing.
Never mind the risk, I knew about it since the beginning. What I meant,
is the source code on 9.24 fixes branch exactly the same with
Bee ha scritto:
Hi all,
Especially to laz's svn maintainers...
I saw laz 9.24 fixes branch on svn had been updated in the last 20
hours. I just want to confirm, is this branch exactly the same with 9.24
release? Because I see most updates had been done 2 weeks ago.
If it is then I'll use th
Hi all,
Especially to laz's svn maintainers...
I saw laz 9.24 fixes branch on svn had been updated in the last 20
hours. I just want to confirm, is this branch exactly the same with 9.24
release? Because I see most updates had been done 2 weeks ago.
If it is then I'll use this branch for my
13 matches
Mail list logo
