Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

2016-11-09 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus
On 2016-11-09 04:43, Lars via Lazarus wrote: > One issue, back in the day, was that you could only use Java programming > language, right? Hence the name "Java Applet" ;-) > Another issue with java applets is you had to make sure they were > installed correctly, No, the web server served it

[Lazarus] WebAssembly

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Schnell via Lazarus
(Creating a new thread instead of using "Help System with Chromium Embedded component") On 09.11.2016 05:38, Lars via Lazarus wrote: On Tue, November 8, 2016 3:49 am, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote: On 08.11.2016 11:42, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote: I seriously doubt that. It's

Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

2016-11-09 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:57:04 +0100 Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > The best reason to have some local (whatever how limited) widget is for IDE > popups of helptext instead of an external browser. Good point. Mattias --

Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

2016-11-09 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus
On 2016-11-09 14:57, Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: > But I think lhelp still has enough leeway, and I think Graeme greatly > overexaggerates the problems. And my comparison screenshots (from earlier) show the problem as clear as day. Your comment about "LHelp works fine with fpdoc

Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

2016-11-09 Thread Martok via Lazarus
Am 09.11.2016 um 16:02 schrieb Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 15:57:04 +0100 > Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: >> [...] >> The best reason to have some local (whatever how limited) widget is for IDE >> popups of helptext instead of an

Re: [Lazarus] WebAssembly

2016-11-09 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:38:59 +0100 Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > Hence WebASM - that seems to be based on Java - might be successful in > pushing the idea of allowing for precompiled byte code embedded in HTML. WebAsm <> WebAssembly. WebAsm is "A

Re: [Lazarus] WebAssembly

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Schnell via Lazarus
-> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2016/10/webassembly-browser-preview/ : However, assuming no issues are found that require substantial time to address, the WebAssembly Community Group would like to mark an initial version of the standard as “done” in Q1 2017 which would then enable browsers to