Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Some quick examples were applications don't follow the look feel
rules of the platform, yet users have no problems in using them.
* Windows Media Player.
* latest Microsoft Office with it's new menu+toolbar design
* Pixel image editor. It fakes native look. But
David Emerson wrote:
* almost any antivirus / antispyware program
:-) Now that's a good example of awful UI design! I wonder if they
actually employee UI designers to purposefully screw the living crap out
of their products UI to make cleaning your Windows PC from viruses any
harder.
The
Brian Prentice schrieb:
My point about showing the differences in the dialogs, one acceptable
and one clearly not acceptable, is that the solution seems to require
the construction of two dialogs one for OS X and one for WindowsXP.
Perhaps I'm wrong here but if I'm right this violates the
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Martin wrote:
2) is what Java and fpgui (and afaik msegui) aim for. It is easier
for the developper. But the enduser will find an application that is
different to any other app he runs on his PC (and therefore harder
to use)
I guess we will have to agree to
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Not me ;) E.g. I really hate systems which have switched Ok/Cancel buttons.
Ah, so you are one of those users... that don't read the screen and
only rely on muscle memory. :-)
Hopefully once I have completed to port of MiG layout, that issue would
be a thing of the
2009/11/13 Graeme Geldenhuys gra...@mastermaths.co.za:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Not me ;) E.g. I really hate systems which have switched Ok/Cancel buttons.
Ah, so you are one of those users... that don't read the screen and
only rely on muscle memory. :-)
Reflex is orders of a magnitude
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Not me ;) E.g. I really hate systems which have switched Ok/Cancel buttons.
Ah, so you are one of those users... that don't read the screen and
only rely on muscle memory. :-)
Yes, because it's quicker. Or do you look at each key before you
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Or do you look at each key before you press it :)?
OK, you got me on that one. :-)
My co-workers hate touching my computer, because I have my keyboard set
to Dvorak, but the actual keyboard keys-caps are still in QWERTY. They
say I have the best password protection
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
probably know Java has solved this problem nicely with layout
managers. If layout managers were implemented in Lazarus the IDE
I fully agree, layout managers (or even only one layout manager) would
solve this problem. LCL has Anchors (a lot more advanced compared
On perjantai, 13. marraskuuta 2009 08:32:22 Mattias Gaertner wrote:
There are examples in components/codetools/examples.
Ok, I will look at them more closely.
It would be nice to look at a class diagram, then a use case diagram
and then maybe a sequence diagram to get an idea of how it
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
Hi,
Has anybody seen this already. It's a software company called
PilotLogic, that uses a rebranded (only in some of the screenshots)
Lazarus. It includes a custom installation of FPC + Lazarus and various
included extra components. They also seem to have a lot more
My co-workers hate touching my computer, because I have my keyboard set
to Dvorak, but the actual keyboard keys-caps are still in QWERTY.
That is geeky, I must say. Wow!
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Hi,
Has anybody seen this already. It's a software company called
PilotLogic, that uses a rebranded (only in some of the screenshots)
Lazarus. It includes a custom installation of FPC + Lazarus and various
included extra components. They also seem to have a lot more demos included.
I'm glad to
On perjantai, 13. marraskuuta 2009 09:29:20 zeljko wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 20:05, David Emerson wrote:
Juha Manninen wrote:
I compiled the whole Lazarus to use QT widgets and it works! Yes.
I've been wanting to do the same, though I failed at my previous
attempt. What did
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Qt_Interface
Looking at the Roadmap page it seems that QT bindings are equally or even
better implemented than GTK2 bindings. So why is it made more difficult to
install? libqt4intf.so could be included in the SVN source tree and in
release
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich [drdiettri...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:14 AM
To: grae...@opensoft.homeip.net; Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] cross platform [Re: Lazarus Goal]
This is an argument for a Web (Delphi IntraWeb?)
On Friday 13 November 2009 16:35, Juha Manninen wrote:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Qt_Interface
Looking at the Roadmap page it seems that QT bindings are equally or even
better implemented than GTK2 bindings. So why is it made more difficult to
install? libqt4intf.so could
There's a bit more to UI design than layouts. Unfortunately this brings up the
idea of aesthetic, something that many developers are vocally uncomfortable
with (i.e. challenged).
Consider the Preferences dialog in Mac Leopard's Mail client:
Hi,
I implemented support for a url href=someurlsometext/url tag in fpdoc
(Revision 14167).
It can be used to include arbitrary links in fpdoc documentation. It's documented in the
current docs.
Maybe lazdoc should be adapted to support it ?
Michael.
--
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Hess, Philip J wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich [drdiettri...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:14 AM
To: grae...@opensoft.homeip.net; Lazarus mailing list
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] cross platform [Re: Lazarus Goal]
This
Hello all,
I dont know if everyone knows this:
I have a dualcore CPU now and was wondering how to use both cores for
compiling for example lazarus.
make -j2 all
uses both cpus and works great with lazarus :)
for a quad-core use option: -j4
hope someone finds this useful
regards
alex
Hi Ido,
i tested it on fpc-2.2.4 src
It seem that it works partial with FPC. Maybe the problem is that the -j
option means that 2 tagets will be processed in parallel, if it is
possible.
I think with FPC it is not allways possible. Compiling works but not all
CPUs are used all the time.
This email is somehow blocked by mailman, so I forward it to the list.
Jonathan schreef:
Gentoo still offers Lazarus version 0.9.26.
I have filed a version bump request and written a ebuild for Lazarus version
0.9.28.2.
You can speed up the fixing of this bug by voting for the version bump bug
I just encountered the most strangest problem. I've got a situation
where form changes I make in the IDE do not effect the form in the
actual exe. I didn't have this problem on Linux. I just noticed this
problem when I created an SVN (subversion ubuntu x64) repository for
my project. Once that
Brian,
I have a one-button mouse that was included with my Mac.
Thanks.
-Phil
- Brian Prentice bprent...@webenet.net wrote:
Not sure if I understand what the problem is. With a one-button mouse
you simulate right-click with Ctrl+click. I've haven't noticed any
problems with it.
2009/11/13 Brian Prentice bprent...@webenet.net:
I use a three button mouse as I suspect most people do since such a mouse is
included with the computer!
Brian
Phil wanted to point, that one-mouse button was provided with original
Apple Macs, for very long time.
To access context menu
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:24:08 -0600
Andrew Brunner andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
I just encountered the most strangest problem. I've got a situation
where form changes I make in the IDE do not effect the form in the
actual exe. I didn't have this problem on Linux. I just noticed this
Hi,
you are right :) I am happy to see both cpu/cores doing the compiling :)
greetings
alex
Am Freitag, den 13.11.2009, 18:43 + schrieb David W Noon:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:38:20 +0100, Alexander Kaupp wrote about
[Lazarus] make option -j:
I dont know if everyone knows this:
I
2009/11/13 Phil Hess macp...@fastermac.net:
Consider the Preferences dialog in Mac Leopard's Mail client:
http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/Lazarus/Screenshots/mail_prefs.jpg
Did you notice the color quoted text comboboxes in the lower left
are not equally spaced. I gather that is not an app
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:24:08 -0600
Andrew Brunner andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have four different folder and each contains the whole project,
or do you share some files?
The each project are stand
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:41:33 -0600
Andrew Brunner andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:24:08 -0600
Andrew Brunner andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have four different folder
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:36:25 +0200
ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Since Lazarus 0.9.28 there is a hint of FPCDoc .
The hint is a popup window with some sort of TSynEdit (?).
Normally it is a TLabel.
If you install the turbopower ipro package, it is html component.
Is there a way to
Either an old lrs file or a resource with the same name exists
This must have been the reason. I added *.lrs to the global ignore
for TortoiseSVN on my client box. Then I deleted *.lrs from SVN.
Then I deleted *.lrs from my local box. Commited changes. And it it
found the latest and greatest
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:47:10 +0100, Marc Weustink wrote about Re:
[Lazarus] make option -j:
[snip]
All lcl units are compiled by fpc through the allunits.pp
project (we use this to let fpc figure out the dependencies)
The same counts for the ide.
I hope when specifying -j2 it builds the lcl
2009/11/14 David W Noon david.w.n...@ntlworld.com:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:47:10 +0100, Marc Weustink wrote about Re:
[Lazarus] make option -j:
[snip]
All lcl units are compiled by fpc through the allunits.pp
project (we use this to let fpc figure out the dependencies)
The same counts for
I've done all this, but at the very beginning of the compilation, I get:
make[2]: *** [../../units/i386-linux/qt] Error 1
and it gives up.
Using debian stable, kde 3.5.9/10. Tried with the packaged lazarus
0.9.28.2-0 as well as svn
$ /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep qt
libqt4intf.so.5 (libc6)
2009/11/13 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
2009/11/13 Phil Hess macp...@fastermac.net:
Consider the Preferences dialog in Mac Leopard's Mail client:
http://web.fastermac.net/~MacPgmr/Lazarus/Screenshots/mail_prefs.jpg
Did you notice the color quoted text comboboxes in the lower
37 matches
Mail list logo
