On mardi 12 février 2008, Guy K. Kloss wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:14:40 pm Frédéric wrote:
> > Ok. I'm not familiar with swig, but I will ask on the french python
> > list. I think it should not be very difficult to handle complete image
> > (using different kind of input/output objects). If
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:14:40 pm Frédéric wrote:
> Ok. I'm not familiar with swig, but I will ask on the french python
> list. I think it should not be very difficult to handle complete image
> (using different kind of input/output objects). If it works, I'll post
> code here.
That would be awesome
Hi,
Sorry, the Python binding are more for numerical computation than for full
images.
COLORB holds just one pixel, filling it with more may corrupt memory.
I did the wrapper, so any suggestion is more than welcome.
Regards
Marti Maria
The littleCMS project
www.littlecms.com
-Original M
Le 12/2/2008, "Marti.Maria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
>Sorry, the Python binding are more for numerical computation than for full
>images.
>COLORB holds just one pixel, filling it with more may corrupt memory.
>
>I did the wrapper, so any suggestion is more than welcome.
Ok. I'm not familiar
Hi,
It should only affect performance.
I'm dropping this on the next release, favoring portability.
The performance gain by USE_ASSEMBLER is negligible on today's compilers.
lcms was started in 1997, and then using assembler or not made a difference.
Today this is no longer true.
Regards
Marti
