Maybe a new API for RAW access makes sense after all.
lcms-2.0 would be a good candidate to add this functionality, so thank
you for the suggestion!
All the best
Marti
On 20/03/2009 18:18:00, phil.r...@sun.com wrote:
> If it doesn't make sense, then there's no need to accept it.
>
> I'll dis
If it doesn't make sense, then there's no need to accept it.
I'll discuss the access of internals with the author of LCMS.c
However for the tag/reading writing yes the Kodak lib
allowed you to manipulate this as raw data, but the problem
is that following this model, probably by design, the same
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the patch.
I was, however, wondering why you need this patch since the
functionality to modify tags is already in the library. And after
inspecting your LCMS.c module, I can see the author is doing heavy use
of undocumented low-level functions.
Accessing things like the LP
Hi,
OpenJDK uses little cms. But in order to pass TCK (compatibility compliance
needed to call
it Java), littlecms needed minor modifications to support API to write tagged
data elements.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/littlecms/
Can these be pushed into 1.18 by the maintainers, before it goe
