Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-05 Thread Mike Aizatsky
eparate email from my google account. > > > > If anybody else in the list are interested in this stuff, please let me > know. Please note this is related to security and therefore I will not > publicly list the vulnerabilities found. On depending on the severity, I > can do a maintenance releas

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-04 Thread Marti
: Sunday, December 4, 2016 7:53 PM To: Marti ; lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms Marti, I've got your e-mail, thanks. I've CC'ed you on all 4 lcms bugs and they should be now visible to you: https://bu

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-04 Thread Mike Aizatsky
; > > Best regards > > Marti Maria > > The LittleCMS project > > http://www.littlecms.com > > > > > > *From:* Mike Aizatsky [mailto:aizat...@google.com] > *Sent:* Friday, December 2, 2016 7:58 PM > *To:* lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net > *Subject:* [Lcms-user] Re

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-03 Thread Marti
...@google.com] Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 7:58 PM To: lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms Hi! Our OSS-Fuzz fuzzing effort (https://testing.googleblog.com/2016/12/announcing-oss-fuzz-continuous-fuzzing.html) has located

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-02 Thread Mike Aizatsky
Is this really such a serious barrier? On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 18:45 Elle Stone wrote: > On 12/02/2016 08:35 PM, Mike Aizatsky wrote: > > This is what we use for authentication and what seems to be widely > > available. Note that any e-mail address can be associated with a Google > > account. > >

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-02 Thread Elle Stone
On 12/02/2016 08:35 PM, Mike Aizatsky wrote: > This is what we use for authentication and what seems to be widely > available. Note that any e-mail address can be associated with a Google > account. So you are saying access is limited to people with Google accounts. This seems just as surprising

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-02 Thread Mike Aizatsky
This is what we use for authentication and what seems to be widely available. Note that any e-mail address can be associated with a Google account. https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/blob/master/docs/faq.md#why-we-require-an-e-mail-associated-with-a-google-account On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:59 PM

Re: [Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-02 Thread Greg Troxel
Mike Aizatsky writes: > We will CC developers on these issues to give them access to stack traces > and reproducer data. For that we'd need an e-mail with associated gmail > account. Do you really intend to limit access to people with gmail accounts? That seems very surprising at first glance.

[Lcms-user] Reporting potential security vulnerabilities in lcms

2016-12-02 Thread Mike Aizatsky
Hi! Our OSS-Fuzz fuzzing effort ( https://testing.googleblog.com/2016/12/announcing-oss-fuzz-continuous-fuzzing.html) has located several potential issues in lcms library (crash, heap use after free, heap buffer overflow) using the fuzz targets we developed ( https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tre