[ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain (posixGroup/groupOfNames)?
my mail wrote: > but i still have one quiestion, where i can found about object class > so when i start to making ldif, i can use it as reference to make my > ldif clean not have object class from another object class Object classes are defined in various standardization documents. The LDAPv3 standard object classes are defined in RFC 4519, posixAccount is defined in RFC 2307. There are many other documents for various other applications (like Samba etc.). To examine the schema actually loaded on your server you should use a decent schema browser. I'm using my web2ldap since IMHO the schema browser is the most complete one. It shows all the forward and backward cross references in the schema including inheritance and allows wildcard searches for schema elements by their names. Being the author of web2ldap I'm biased off course. Ciao, Michael.
[ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain (posixGroup/groupOfNames)?
--- On Thu, 2/5/09, Michael Ströder wrote: > From: Michael Ströder > Subject: [ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain > (posixGroup/groupOfNames)? > To: "ldap" > Date: Thursday, February 5, 2009, 1:37 PM > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> but it's okay if i use schemacheck off in my > slapd.conf? > > > > No. schemacheck off is always a bad idea; and it > probably doesn't work > > the way you imagine it does anyway. > > "schemacheck off" is simpy ignored in recent > versions of OpenLDAP. > > See also OpenLDAP's Faq-O-Matic: > ldap add: invalid structural object class chain > http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/883.html > > Ciao, Michael. thanks you for the reply my slapd has running now. but i still have one quiestion, where i can found about object class so when i start to making ldif, i can use it as reference to make my ldif clean not have object class from another object class thanks you
[ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain (posixGroup/groupOfNames)?
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> but it's okay if i use schemacheck off in my slapd.conf? > > No. schemacheck off is always a bad idea; and it probably doesn't work > the way you imagine it does anyway. "schemacheck off" is simpy ignored in recent versions of OpenLDAP. See also OpenLDAP's Faq-O-Matic: ldap add: invalid structural object class chain http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/883.html Ciao, Michael.
[ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain (posixGroup/groupOfNames)?
> but it's okay if i use schemacheck off in my slapd.conf? No. schemacheck off is always a bad idea; and it probably doesn't work the way you imagine it does anyway.
[ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain (posixGroup/groupOfNames)?
--- On Thu, 2/5/09, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > From: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Subject: Re: [ldap] how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain > (posixGroup/groupOfNames)? > To: "amfpg" , [email protected] > Date: Thursday, February 5, 2009, 3:24 AM > --On Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:28 PM -0500 amfpg > wrote: > > > groupOfNames and posixGroup are both STRUCTURAL > objectClasses. An object can only be one type of thing. > So, is it a posixGroup, or is it a groupOfNames? You need > to decide. Just like an object cannot be both a tree and an > ocean. These are two distinct concepts. > > --Quanah > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Engineer > Zimbra, Inc > > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and > collaboration oh i see that, thanks for your explain, i'll fix my ldif file but it's okay if i use schemacheck off in my slapd.conf? thanks
[ldap] Re: how to fix (65) invalid structural object class chain (posixGroup/groupOfNames)?
--On Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:28 PM -0500 amfpg wrote: i have google this error but can found the solution, i have ldiff like this what i must to do so i can using slapadd to add this ldif into my ldap groupOfNames and posixGroup are both STRUCTURAL objectClasses. An object can only be one type of thing. So, is it a posixGroup, or is it a groupOfNames? You need to decide. Just like an object cannot be both a tree and an ocean. These are two distinct concepts. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
