Message-
From: Justin R Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LDS Open Source Software
Subject: Re: [Ldsoss] LDS Opencontent Directory
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:30:16AM -0600, Steven H. McCown wrote:
Applying the definition of the word
Justin R Findlay wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:53:53AM -0600, Christopher Phillips wrote:
...
Copyright law is seriously b0rk. You have my sympathy for having to
regularly deal with it's insanely restrictive terms.
According to the New York Times, the verb to bork might be defined as to
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:30:16AM -0600, Steven H. McCown wrote:
Applying the definition of the word b0rk to Christopher's use of the word
regarding copyright, I would have to also agree that copyright is being
destroyed through a concerted attack on [its] character. I further agree
that
I think that using existing repositories is a great idea whenever possible, especially for any type of content that might have values to a bigger audience. However I think there is enough LDS themed content that a completely separate directory would be helpful in order to facilitate the setup of
Besides being only for code, sourceforge isn't a model of user
friendliness that you would expect Sunday school teachers will need
in a site.
I'm a proponent of using existing content repositories where possible
(not reinventing the wheel). The downside is that sites like
I am new to the list and was directed here by Richard Miller of the More Good Foundation in response to an email that I sent him yesterday, I pass it on for comment. Richard, I'm sure that the group would love to hear your response and ideas in your reply to my original email...
I am sending
On Jul 7, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Christopher Phillips wrote:
I am new to the list and was directed here by Richard Miller of
the More Good Foundation in response to an email that I sent him
yesterday, I pass it on for comment. Richard, I'm sure that the
group would love to hear your response
