I've taken to using the "Red Hat 5.x Compatible" libraries and
compilation. Usually, it works, but it is definitely not as easy as
using Red Hat 5 (or Debian Slink) out of the box.
In particular, things have problems when "interacting" with
/usr/include. All of the glibc includes are in
/usr
exactly - w/ exception of swap, none of these are router/fw functions, but
rather service image functions :-) prolly shouldn't quibble semantics when
I only have five minutes & 1 hand to read email...
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-02-19 13:28 -0600
>On 19 Feb 2001, at 18:39, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > You and Charles would still have your individual directories.
> > Charles will still be able to mirror his content to the /cstein
> > directory. The new "eigerstein" and "oxygen" web directories will
> > b
Everyone,
I guess I should explain my view of the ftp/pub structure a little more.
First, unlike the web directory, it will not go into CVS. Second, files
that are released in the "Files" section will not be here. Web site links
for released files will point to specific URLs located here:
http
On 19 Feb 2001, at 18:39, Mike Noyes wrote:
> I stand corrected. You want that content linked from our home
> page. Correct?
Ray Olszewski said:
> Trying to connect to the URL you list above results in --
>
> "Not Found
>
> "The requested URL /pub/oxygen/ was not found on this
Mike Noyes, 2001-02-19 10:37 -0800
>I'm proposing new EigerStein and Oxygen pages.
Everyone,
Please excuse my prior trees. Here are the correct ones.
Current web tree /home/groups/leaf:
htdocs -+
|
+ /addons (EigerStein)
|
+ /cstein (EigerStein
|
Mike Noyes, 2001-02-19 10:37 -0800
Correction to the current tree:
>Current web tree /home/groups/leaf:
>htdocs -+
> |
|
+ /addons (EigerStein)
|
> + /cstein (EigerStein
> |
> + /pub/oxygen (Oxygen
>
>Current files tree /home/group
Ray Olszewski, 2001-02-19 10:35 -0800
>At 11:52 AM 2/19/01 -0600, David Douthitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Charles' page is at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/cstein/ ; mine is at
> >http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/oxygen/ ; how do these differ from
> >what you were talking of?
>
>Trying to connec
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-02-19 11:52 -0600
>On 19 Feb 2001, at 16:30, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-02-19 10:11 -0600
>
> > It's already on our site:
> > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/cstein/
>
>That's not our site; that's Charles. "Ours" is at
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net ...
Dav
At 11:52 AM 2/19/01 -0600, David Douthitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...
>> I still haven't received your response to my earlier suggestion:
>
>> >Provided Charles and David agree, I'd like us to create new EigerStein and
>> >Oxygen pages. I think this will allow us to eliminate/reduce web
>> >m
On 19 Feb 2001, at 17:02, Jack Coates wrote:
> that could be very handy for service images, but router/fw images
> are not likely to have a need (except for VPN which AFAIK doesn't
> use kerneli.org stuff).
Possibly true. However, crypto does enhance security. My main
purpose is to expand fl
On 19 Feb 2001, at 16:30, Mike Noyes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-02-19 10:11 -0600
> It's already on our site:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/cstein/
That's not our site; that's Charles. "Ours" is at
http://leaf.sourceforge.net ...
> I still haven't received your response to my earlier s
thet could be very handy for service images, but router/fw images are not
likely to have a need (except for VPN which AFAIK doesn't use kerneli.org
stuff).
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 19 Feb 2001, at 15:58, Mike Sensney
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-02-19 10:11 -0600
>On 19 Feb 2001, at 15:58, Mike Sensney wrote:
>
> > Check out Charles' page toward the bottom in the section titled
> > "Cryptographic Software". http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
>
>Can we put this onto the SourceForge web site and put up some
>precompiled cry
On 19 Feb 2001, at 15:58, Mike Sensney wrote:
> At 07:03 AM 02/19/2001 -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Is the crypto really available to release in the U.S.? Or is it
> > > still a dangerous thing? I asked on a mailing list a while back and
> >
At 07:03 AM 02/19/2001 -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is the crypto really available to release in the U.S.? Or is it
> > still a dangerous thing? I asked on a mailing list a while back and
> > got ZERO responses - so I removed my Oxygen kernel with
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2001, at 18:33, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > The tree is 2.2.18 based and the kernel is compiling to 413002 bytes.
>
> Not bad! ...
>
> > Patches are:
> > linux_brfw_2.2.17.diff
>
> Do you have the bridgex or whatever it was compiled to an *.lr
On 17 Feb 2001, at 18:33, Jack Coates wrote:
> The tree is 2.2.18 based and the kernel is compiling to 413002 bytes.
Not bad! ...
> Patches are:
> linux_brfw_2.2.17.diff
Do you have the bridgex or whatever it was compiled to an *.lrp?
> linux-2.2.17-ow1.diff
This is now at linux-2.2.18-ow4 .
18 matches
Mail list logo
