Re: syslog.conf (was: Re: [Leaf-devel] Vulnerabilities dot org)

2001-04-29 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Samstag, 28. April 2001 12:16 schrieben Sie: Ray Olszewski wrote: At 10:45 PM 4/26/01 -0700, Scott C. Best wrote: wrong where each packet log gets recorded in 3 places? I forget which version of LRP you use, but probably what you're doing wrong is accepting the default settings in

Re: [Leaf-devel] Web Site DOWN

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:37, Mike Noyes wrote: Ewald Wasscher, 2001-04-23 20:22 +0200 Mike Noyes wrote: Interesting. The German text is present on the SF home page again. At least I think it's German. No, it's Dutch! (which is very similar to German) Then there is Pennsylvania Dutch -

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 25 Apr 2001, at 21:02, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Is the only choice between Scylla (vi-mode) and Charybdis (wasting disk space)? e3ws, e3vi, e3ne, e3em, et al, are just links to e3; in Oxygen you need to be careful as the actual binary is e3.bin, with a shell wrapper and all the links point to

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the seg fault in 'busybox

Re: [Leaf-devel] Found my development platform.

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 26 Apr 2001, at 19:34, Scott C. Best wrote: Forgive the off-topic moment of levity but...Oooo. http://www.jp.playstation.com/linux/image/main.jpg I can see it now...a Missle Command like interface to zap incoming packets of questionable origin... :^)

Re: [Leaf-devel] diskspace check

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 27 Apr 2001, at 16:32, Jack Coates wrote: the annoying thing is that I don't see where it's getting called from -- it's not in crontab, but I do know it's getting called because the ping check goes off about hourly. Multicron is indeed in crontab, and is called as part of run- parts -

Re: [Leaf-devel] diskspace check

2001-04-29 Thread Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-29 16:16 -0500 On 27 Apr 2001, at 17:25, Mike Noyes wrote: A Nessus scan can add enough log entries in less than five minutes to exceed free ramdisk space. This is on a box with 16M of memory. If I remember correctly, David solved this problem in Oxygen by

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread Ewald Wasscher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22 Apr 2001, at 14:34, Ewald Wasscher wrote: replace gunzip with zcat My understanding is that zcat is: #!/bin/sh gunzip -c $1 Of course, but it's also an alias for the gunzip applet in busybox. 22-4add e3 (the pre 1.5 from oxygen) as the

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread Ewald Wasscher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see

Re: [Leaf-devel] Found my development platform.

2001-04-29 Thread Jack Coates
I've played -- err, managed processes -- with this tool. It's extremely amusing, but a little nerve-wracking unless you have a top window nearby to translate pid-to-process. Killing X or the shell you started psdoom from puts a quick end to the game :-) -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: It's what's

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 2:08, Ewald Wasscher wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22 Apr 2001, at 14:34, Ewald Wasscher wrote: 22-4TODO: update all binaries to the _latest_ versions available? Is this a good idea? That will probably use some additional diskspace Yes, definitely. Fixes

Re: [Leaf-devel] diskspace check

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 0:41, Mike Noyes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-29 16:16 -0500 On 27 Apr 2001, at 17:25, Mike Noyes wrote: He recommends 18M for Oxygen though, and I don't know if this fixes the performance slowdown. Oxygen can run in 16M; I've done it many times. Oxygen

[Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a lot in the next week or so... Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. (ask your wives if that's big :-) Current outstanding development concerns: * Both Oxygen versions (glibc 2.0.7 and 2.1.3)

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 10:37 PM 4/29/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a lot in the next week or so... In a pig's eye, you're not. You just won't be doing the stuff you usually tell us about. Congratulations, David. Andrew James was born 22 April

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a lot in the next week or so... Heh heh. You really think everything will be back to normal in a week :-) Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz.

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Dale Long
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ooph! I don't have to. Is there a infant blue ox in the back yard as well? No blue oxes :-) but his older brother was 10 lbs. 2 oz. at birth :-) How long was the labour for both of them? Ouch. Dale.

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Paul Batozech
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a lot in the next week or so... Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. (ask your wives if that's big :-) David Congratulations!! I have the feeling you'll be doing

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 5:29, Dale Long wrote: On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ooph! I don't have to. Is there a infant blue ox in the back yard as well? No blue oxes :-) but his older brother was 10 lbs. 2 oz. at birth :-) How long was the labour for both of them? Ouch.

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Dale Long
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Paul Batozech wrote: Congratulations!! I have the feeling you'll be doing plenty in the foreseeable future, just not much with Oxygen:) A little late-night coding between feeds and nappy changes works well. Dale. ___

[OT] Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Dale Long
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew came in about three pushes :O came so fast that he wound up bruised a bit, but none the worse for the wear. I caught one of mine shooting out. They can be quite slippery. Dale. ___ Leaf-devel