On 2 May 2001, at 15:18, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> I have to agree with that to a great extent. But many programs use a
> "configure" script to configure the source tree to be built with certain
> options. I really prefer to have a script in the diff that calls this
> configure script to doing t
Just got back from this (sorry I missed anyone else who was there, it
was a spur of the moment thing and I didn't get a chance to plan hooking
up).
Midori is definitely aimed at the end user or developer of handhelds and
mini-laptops. No surprise there. The Transmeta guys doing the presenting
see
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > What I had in mind was to do the same thing, but with patched sources
> > - and thus then create a package at the same time.
> >
> I would like to keep the lrp-specific things as seperate as possible
> from the or
Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2001 21:35 schrieben Sie:
> On 30 Apr 2001, at 19:32, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
> > I've also an lrp package for dinosaurs available - rexx.lrp based on Ian
> > Colliers REXX/imc.
>
> I've seen REXX, but never got into coding it. I've looked at it a
IMHO REXX is the most easy-to
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-02 14:17 +0200
>Wow, now I need a break. And some coffee too :-)
>
>I hope it's a little clearer now what I want and why. If not I'll have to
>do better. I'd _really_ like to know what people think about this, not
>just you.
Ewald,
Thanks for the explanation. :)
I'll sit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2 May 2001, at 13:23, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>> If I understand correctly how David does this it's not necessarily
>> obvious to someone other than David how a program is configured, and how
>> it is built, what files to use in the .lrp package, and what lrp
>>
On 2 May 2001, at 13:23, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> If I understand correctly how David does this it's not necessarily
> obvious to someone other than David how a program is configured, and how
> it is built, what files to use in the .lrp package, and what lrp
> specific configs need to be added
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 May 2001, at 15:19, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a default way of building packages,
>> like Debian? With Debian you can cd into the upacked/patched source
>> directory and do a dpkg-buildpackage -b and voila! a binary package
>
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Ewald Wasscher, 2001-05-01 20:24 +0200
>
>> Mike Noyes wrote:
>> David proposed something like this already. Take a look at this patch.
>>
>>> Source code + diffs for CVS
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=412704&group_id=13751
>>> \
>>> &atid=313751
>>
>