Le Jeudi 18 Juillet 2002 18:32, Brad Fritz a écrit :
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:13:48 CDT Russ Price wrote:
> > Brad Fritz wrote:
> >
> > I'm using RC3. Here's what I get:
> >
> > # gzip --help
> > BusyBox v0.60.3 (2002.06.08-17:56+) multi-call binary
> >
> > # gzip bar.txt.gz
> > # ls -l bar.t
Everyone,
Jon is having some problems with mail delivery to our lists. He'll
respond after a resolution is found.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
---
This sf.net email is spons
At 08:42 AM 7/18/02 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
>[...]
> > Considering that the whole thing consists of a number ~(10 -> 12)
> > scripts/C-programs, do I need to put the 'notice' in each one? Or is it
> > sufficient to put it in, say, a README, packaged with the rest?
>
>Jon,
>I think it's acceptable
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 01:18, Jon Clausen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > NOTE: There *IS* a GPL notification at the start of sh-httpd, it was a
> > bit more work :)
>
> And that is what it takes? So I basically 'just declare' my stuff to be
> GPL
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 01:18, Jon Clausen wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Thanks for your input :) Comments and more questions inline;
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> > > What do I do with my blinder.lrp (it's getting closer to
> > > releaseability)... licensi
Kim
At 16:12 18.07.2002, you wrote:
>Aanhalen Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>At this point it is not working.
>For various reasons.
>
>So far I changed the obvious /usr/bin/ksh to /bin/sh on line 1.
makes sense
>I replaced all instances of print with echo.
>There are a lot of [] in the s
Charles,
Thanks for your input :) Comments and more questions inline;
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > What do I do with my blinder.lrp (it's getting closer to
> > releaseability)... licensing-wise?
>
> Pretty much whatever you want :)
Heh... :)
> >
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 07:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aanhalen Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> At this point it is not working.
> For various reasons.
>
> So far I changed the obvious /usr/bin/ksh to /bin/sh on line 1.
>
> I replaced all instances of print with echo.
> There are a lot of
Aanhalen Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At this point it is not working.
For various reasons.
So far I changed the obvious /usr/bin/ksh to /bin/sh on line 1.
I replaced all instances of print with echo.
There are a lot of [] in the script which apparently are not tolerated by ash.
The script m
Kim
At 12:12 18.07.2002, you wrote:
>hi all,
>
>Is there anybody who knows wether korn shell scripting is compatible
>with ash?
up to e certain degree, it certainly is
>Reason I ask is because mij dns registrar has a dynamic subscription type.
>Which updates your ip by using a korn shell script
hi all,
Is there anybody who knows wether korn shell scripting is compatible
with ash?
Reason I ask is because mij dns registrar has a dynamic subscription type.
Which updates your ip by using a korn shell script.
If not is there somebody in here with both korn & ash shell scripting
that would
salut jacques
> 1/ Could you confirm that this setting was working OK with rc1
this works with rc1. with rc3 a tcp-connection with port 1723 (pptp) is made
but the server sends nothing. then windows complains with error 651. on the
server-side there are no log-entries at all. so i have no hint,
12 matches
Mail list logo
