Hi Eric and list
first thanks for the wakeup call...
Some time ago I was leaning a bit out of the window by believing I would
have lots of time for the config package, the truth is, I didn't.
I tried to build a little working example of a small configuration issue
(just the keyboad configurati
Hello Ray Matt,
first of all thanks for your reactions.
> I know I too am coming into this late, but let me offer a couple of thoughts.
>
> Basically, I think Matt's standards are a bit too high. He writes:
>
> >Honestly I can't think of anything I need to do remotely
> >over a web config progr
I know I too am coming into this late, but let me offer a couple of thoughts.
Basically, I think Matt's standards are a bit too high. He writes:
Honestly I can't think of anything I need to do remotely
over a web config program once the system is booted that
I can't do with ssh. But that's why
Hello Lynn A few notes to think about .
- on the security issue we agree.
What I wanted to do was to keep the possibility for users to keep to the original way
of modifying. ( plain txt editing)
This made it more difficult to parse such files, but also more flexible.
If they inserted a comment
In an effort to define the problem, which presumably is a
lack of ability to administer a LEAF box in other ways, I'm
asking for the top 5 things you'd like to be able to administer?
Here are mine:
1) Install boot modules before ever booting LEAF
2) Install nic modules before ever
Has anyone written instructions for the best way to do this? I would like
to include it (by reference if nothing else) in the Shorewall
Install/Upgrade instructions.
Thanks,
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline,\ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ [EMAIL PRO
Lynn Avants wrote:
As I noted, this post is to submit where I am with
[snip]
Thoughts, comments, suggestions, or flames???
Nuts! That's my flame. Nuts.
This whole idea I mean. Don't get me wrong... I'm all down
for doinking around in a GUI to do some of the config, but ya'll
are going ab
Am Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 19:43 schrieb Matt Johnston:
> Hi all.
>
> I compiled my own kernel (2.4.20, pretty much stock except mppe etc) for
> Bering 1.0.2uclibc, and it refused to boot properly. Using the stock
> kernel, it all worked fine.
>
> Eventually I figured out that for some reason,
Grub works a charm with LEAF - I've been using it with Bering for ages.
I like it because it has decent security, good serial console support,
and happily boots FreeDOS as well. I use DOS as a lifesaver when I've
rendered a Bering system unbootable with a bung kernel or package - it
takes about 1M
