Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Charles, Files like mount.boot, boot.fstype and /dev/boot are removed (which is great btw), but they are used in some of the lrcfg/lrpkg scripts AFAIK. So maybe some of these scripts needs some changes too. I don't think the Dachstein package backup scripts use these

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Eric Spakman wrote: Charles, snip There are at least three ways to deal with this: 1) Remove the references to these files from POSIXNESS.linuxrouter, replacing them with references to the newer files (and likely get rid of the mount.boot procedure entirely). 2) Create the files in linuxrc,

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Erich Titl
Charles At 06:11 16.03.2004 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Charles, Files like mount.boot, boot.fstype and /dev/boot are removed (which is great btw), but they are used in some of the lrcfg/lrpkg scripts AFAIK. So maybe some of these scripts needs some changes too.

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Erich Titl wrote: snip 3) Ignore the problem with manually adding packages once the system is up and running. :) or insert backuptype NONE if not specified at lrpkg -i I looked into linuxrc myself and found that it does not use lrpkg to install packages. It is not a big deal but to me this is

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Erich Titl
At 10:29 16.03.2004 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Erich Titl wrote: snip 3) Ignore the problem with manually adding packages once the system is up and running. :) or insert backuptype NONE if not specified at lrpkg -i I looked into linuxrc myself and found that it does not use lrpkg to

Re: [leaf-devel] New linuxrc mods ready for testing

2004-03-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 07:36, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: The biggest help at this point would be for others to test the new linuxrc, make sure it works for them, and think about any other features that might need to be added to linuxrc or leaf.cfg. Charles, Did you look at David's apkg? I

Re: [leaf-devel] FYI: New package directory

2004-03-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 08:02, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Please read the instructions in the README you'll find in that repository first, it will be helpful to build the above web page in the current format automatically. K.-P., Greg Morgan is working on this task. phpWebSite package repository

Re: [leaf-devel] FYI: New package directory

2004-03-16 Thread K.-P. Kirchdrfer
Am Dienstag, 16. Mrz 2004 18:16 schrieb Mike Noyes: On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 08:02, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Please read the instructions in the README you'll find in that repository first, it will be helpful to build the above web page in the current format automatically. K.-P., Greg Morgan

Re: [leaf-devel] New Website

2004-03-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 14:51, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, The website upgrade is taking longer than I anticipated. I'm less than a quarter done. Even so, I hope to go live with the new site this weekend. Everyone, As you may have noticed, our new website isn't operational yet. Work is

[leaf-devel] FYI: New package directory

2004-03-16 Thread K.-P. Kirchdrfer
As of today a new package directory for LEAF Bering-uClibc packages called testing is available. Packages in this directory could be build and contributed by someone outside the Bering-uClibc team, or build for users by request and untested due to lack of hardware etc.., and will be provided