Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClib with kernel 2.6?

2004-07-13 Thread Tim Thomson
I'm not sure on all the changes needed yet. The module loading and firewall will need to be updated, though IIRC busybox can do both, though I can't remember whether busybox is been used for these at the moment, or the native programs. I'll make a list up at some stage. Hopefully I'll get time to

[leaf-devel] Bering-uClib with kernel 2.6?

2004-07-13 Thread Tim Thomson
Hi everyone, I couldn't see in the archives whether anyone had built Bering-uClib using a 2.6 series kernel. Has this been done? I'm keen to give it a try if I get some time again. Would be interesting to get SELinux working with it too. I had a play awhile ago, though IIRC busybox had issues com

[leaf-devel] ANN: Bering-uClibc 2.2 -beta5

2004-07-13 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
The Bering-uClibc team releases Bering-uClibc 2.2 beta5 We told you that beta4 would be the latest beta and a release candidate will follow - but we decided to go with another beta version due to the update of ash to dash 0.5.1 (plus additional patches). This is the first time for years ash has

Re: [leaf-devel] source config

2004-07-13 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 20:18 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 10:14, Erich Titl wrote: > At 15:51 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: > >Lua and uClibc are available. Lua was even packaged and used by David > >Douthitt in Oxygen. > > actually lua sounds quite interesting, looks pretty small, it could

Re: [leaf-devel] source config

2004-07-13 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 10:14, Erich Titl wrote: > At 15:51 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: > >Lua and uClibc are available. Lua was even packaged and used by David > >Douthitt in Oxygen. > > actually lua sounds quite interesting, looks pretty small, it could open > new horizons. Does anyone know if

Re: [leaf-devel] source config

2004-07-13 Thread Erich Titl
Mike At 15:51 13.07.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:32, Chad Carr wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 09:54, Mike Noyes wrote: > The problem is, basically, that the existing tools I know of are written > in perl or C++, both of which are too large for our purposes. Chad, Lua and uClibc

Re: [leaf-devel] source config

2004-07-13 Thread Mike Noyes
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:32, Chad Carr wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 09:54, Mike Noyes wrote: > The problem is, basically, that the existing tools I know of are written > in perl or C++, both of which are too large for our purposes. Chad, Lua and uClibc are available. Lua was even packaged and us