Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi Charles, I'm looking at this from the perspective of a 'power' end user, who would like to tweak some things, but be able to easily stay current on files I choose not to modify. With all package/source statements in a single big file, it seems like it would be harder to use CVS or other

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread Jaap Eldering
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:03:40PM +0100, Martin Hejl wrote: - - Re-target downloads to a local repository or mirror (to verify complete independence from SF or leaf-project.org, and to control exactly which version(s) of packages are used for an 'in-house' release). That should actually be

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread Martin Hejl
Hi Charles, I see kp already responded :-) | You'll have to add the new package to conf/sources.cfg like any other | - don't bother about server/network stuff - with all needed files | in sources/yourpackage it will not try to download again. Thanks...I didn't realize it wouldn't try downloading

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread Arne Bernin
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 11:04 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So far, the only thing that seems odd about buildtool is the centralized file with all the servers, sources, and packages (conf/sources.cfg). The files for building each package are

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 22. März 2005 18:04 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: | Am Dienstag, 22. März 2005 17:33 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: snip | What's the easiest way to 'tinker' with creating a new package? | It looks like I need to put the initial package files online via

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 10:01, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Am Dienstag, 22. Mrz 2005 18:04 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: Also, what's the preferred method to provide files for a new package so they can be included in CVS? A tgz file of sources/pkg and a diff of conf/sources.cfg, or some other

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Noyes wrote: | On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 10:01, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: | We can also offer you access to our complete cvs tree (includes write | access to buildtool :)). | | K.-P., | As a project admin Charles has global write access in our

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc: development environment assistance ???

2005-03-23 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 17:32 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: Mike Noyes wrote: | On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 10:01, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: | We can also offer you access to our complete cvs tree (includes | write access to buildtool :)). | | K.-P., | As a project admin Charles has global

Re: [leaf-devel] Website

2005-03-23 Thread Larry Platzek
Mike I know we spoke on the phone yesterday about 1400 and you wanted to know if I had seen this email and I said no, it arrive between 0930 and 1115 today! I wonder what took it so long? This is more to let you know sometimes things are slow arriving than anything else. On Tue, 22 Mar 2005,

Re: [leaf-devel] Website

2005-03-23 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Hi; Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 20:22 schrieb Larry Platzek: Mike I know we spoke on the phone yesterday about 1400 and you wanted to know if I had seen this email and I said no, it arrive between 0930 and 1115 today! I wonder what took it so long? This is more to let you know sometimes

Re: [leaf-devel] Website

2005-03-23 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:33, K.-P. Kirchdrfer wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. Mrz 2005 20:22 schrieb Larry Platzek: I know we spoke on the phone yesterday about 1400 and you wanted to know if I had seen this email and I said no, it arrive between 0930 and 1115 today! I wonder what took it so long?