On Monday 04 April 2005 10:49, Andrea Galmacci - awd wrote:
> Just to give continuity to my previous announcement, this is to confirm my
> committment to port my scripts collection for Shorewall (already published
> as a tarball for 'standard' distros that could use apache + sudo) under
> webconf
If I may pile on...
On Monday 04 April 2005 16:39, Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Not yet, but Nathan ported apkg to be usable for Bering(-uClibc) if
> I'm not mistaken. So it should be possible to use it as a drop-in.
The apkg "port" is more like an "apkg-lite." it works for me, ymmv.
announ
Hi Mike,
Not yet, but Nathan ported apkg to be usable for Bering(-uClibc) if
I'm not mistaken. So it should be possible to use it as a drop-in.
About ipkg, note that all LEAF branches are designed to be run in
RAM. Ipkg is used to be installed on a storage device. Besides most
ipkg packages ar
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 20:21 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 10:44, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
> > any chance you enable the FAQ section?
>
> K.-P.,
> Are you referring to the SF DocManager? If so, all of our
> DocManager documents are in CVS. I monitor them for changes, and no
> one h
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 09:26, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 07:09, Erich Titl wrote:
> > I wonder if, for a glibc environment, we could use precompiled
> > binaries from a current distro.
>
> Erich,
> OpenWRT and others use ipkg. It may be an option.
>
> http://handhelds.org/m
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 09:26, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 07:09, Erich Titl wrote:
> > I wonder if, for a glibc environment, we could use precompiled
> > binaries from a current distro.
>
> Erich,
> OpenWRT and others use ipkg. It may be an option.
>
> http://handhelds.org/m
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 05:54, Eric Spakman wrote:
> With the base webconf system you can edit the packages like with
> lrcfg but by using package specific "lwp" packages you can make a
> nice interface to a package configuration and still have the choice
> to do it the "old fashioned way" by usin
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 07:09, Erich Titl wrote:
> I wonder if, for a glibc environment, we could use precompiled
> binaries from a current distro.
Erich,
OpenWRT and others use ipkg. It may be an option.
http://handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/Ipkg
http://openwrt.org/ipkg/
--
Mike No
Hello Andrea,
That's very good news!!
Eric Spakman
-
Just to give continuity to my previous announcement, this is to
confirm my
committment to port my scripts collection for Shorewall (already
published
as a tarball for 'stan
Just to give continuity to my previous announcement, this is to confirm my
committment to port my scripts collection for Shorewall (already published
as a tarball for 'standard' distros that could use apache + sudo) under
webconf - that I consider very good indeed having solved one of the most
diff
Hello Erich,
>Also with
>adding a big glibc you will hit other problems like initrd space and
>system RAM (LEAF is enterily run in RAM) so a big flashdisk is not
>the only requirement.
>
>Agreed, I may be biased in that I hardly ever see a system with less
>than 64 Mb
Yes, that's true. But the ni
Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
Hello Erich, Andrea,
There are more important things to be done in the Bering branch, a
lot of packages contain old versions of programs with known security
flaws.
I know, I updated a few
The Bering-uClibc team did a lot of work to update and tweak
almost every source
Hello Erich, Andrea,
There are more important things to be done in the Bering branch, a
lot of packages contain old versions of programs with known security
flaws. The Bering-uClibc team did a lot of work to update and tweak
almost every source and improve the internals of all the packages and
Hi
Andrea Galmacci - awd wrote:
...
If I recall the reason a move wasn't made to newer glibc versions was
size. With the abundance of cheep flash devices, should the Bering team
reconsider newer glibc versions?
Yes, please!
Just my opinion,
IMHO Bering needs (among others)
- a more recent
Happy to hear from you again, Eric!
> > > > The main problem with bering is the old Library, that isn't
supported
> anymore,
> > > > and new application mostly have to be adapted to be able to compile
> under
> > > > Bering.
> >
> > If I recall the reason a move wasn't made to newer glibc versions
15 matches
Mail list logo
