On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 02:05 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 20.09.2010 00:17, Mike Noyes пишет:
> > Andrew,
> > I was referring to LEAF project members. We have over 80. Most of whom,
> > aren't code contributers. They help with support, documentation, etc.
> > The current access is:
> >
> > leaf/CVSROOT/av
20.09.2010 00:17, Mike Noyes пишет:
> Andrew,
> I was referring to LEAF project members. We have over 80. Most of whom,
> aren't code contributers. They help with support, documentation, etc.
> The current access is:
>
> leaf/CVSROOT/avail
> # Selective access for teams, etc.
> avail|arneb, dorus
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:58 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 19.09.2010 21:55, Mike Noyes пишет:
> > Andrew,
> > Just let me know which developers you want to have access, and I'll
> > change it. Alternately, we could make that tree writable by all.
Andrew,
I was referring to LEAF project members. We have o
19.09.2010 21:55, Mike Noyes пишет:
>
> Andrew,
> Just let me know which developers you want to have access, and I'll
> change it. Alternately, we could make that tree writable by all.
IMHO it'll not be good if tree will be writable by anyone anonymously or
any sourceforge user (if I rightly und
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 21:12 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 19.09.2010 20:11, davidMbrooke пишет:
> > One minor point: when I try building the "root" package it fails at
> > building "syslog-ng" because there is no declared dependency on "flex":
> >
> > cfg-lex.o: In function `yylex':
> > cfg-lex.
19.09.2010 20:11, davidMbrooke пишет:
> One minor point: when I try building the "root" package it fails at
> building "syslog-ng" because there is no declared dependency on "flex":
>
> cfg-lex.o: In function `yylex':
> cfg-lex.c:(.text+0xece): undefined reference to `yywrap'
> col
Thanks Mike,
My access is working fine and you will see that I have started creating
some pages at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/
Mostly "skeleton" structure (and our logo!) for now but I have some
draft content I will copy across when I next get chance.
We can use the "discussion"
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 16:19 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 19.09.2010 15:59, davidMbrooke пишет:
> >
> > Sounds good. Let me know when I should try another clean build.
> >
> > davidMbrooke
> >
> Try now. I pushed all into CVS, it seems like all will be OK. I'm not
> sure about patches of MPFR configure (
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 14:53 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> Thanks Mike & kp,
>
> I have been developing some ideas on the documentation structure which I
> will upload once I have edit permission to the Wiki.
David,
Done. The Mediawiki configuration changed a bit.
* Davidmbrooke (editor) (C
Thanks Mike & kp,
I have been developing some ideas on the documentation structure which I
will upload once I have edit permission to the Wiki. My preference is to
keep something similar to the structure we get with the DocBook content
(Books, Chapters etc.) and to separate Bering-uClibc 4.x docum
19.09.2010 15:59, davidMbrooke пишет:
>
> Sounds good. Let me know when I should try another clean build.
>
> davidMbrooke
>
Try now. I pushed all into CVS, it seems like all will be OK. I'm not
sure about patches of MPFR configure (to avoiding linkage from /lib and
/usr/lib) - possible it'll b
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 00:24 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. September 2010, 21:15:06 schrieb davidMbrooke:
-snip-
> > We will need some new user (and developer?) documentation for
> > Bering-uClibc4, at least to reflect the differences from v3 and
> > preferably to improve on what
Thanks Andrew
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 13:44 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 19.09.2010 00:42, davidMbrooke пишет
> >
> > The upstream version of elvis is now 2.2 (compared to our current 1.4).
> > I use elvis as my main editor on Bering-uClibc so I will look at
> > upgrading the package.
> >
> Yes, it'll be
19.09.2010 15:08, Andrew пишет:
>I checked what will be if I just place libraries (gmp, mpfr, mpc) into
> GCC dir (as said in http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html) -
> this trick doesn't work. So it seems that it's actually needed to
> compile these libs twice.
Sorry, I read manual i
I checked what will be if I just place libraries (gmp, mpfr, mpc) into
GCC dir (as said in http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html) -
this trick doesn't work. So it seems that it's actually needed to
compile these libs twice.
-
19.09.2010 00:42, davidMbrooke пишет:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The upstream version of elvis is now 2.2 (compared to our current 1.4).
> I use elvis as my main editor on Bering-uClibc so I will look at
> upgrading the package.
>
> Our current radius is the Cistron 1.6.8 and a better replacement would
> b
16 matches
Mail list logo
