Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 22:14:57 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi
>
> reading along this list for quite some time finally got me to the point
> that I wanted to see if that thing would compile on my box.
>
> If I observe all these changes going into CVS I am wondering how you
> guys keep up tha
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 22:14 +0100, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi
>
> reading along this list for quite some time finally got me to the point
> that I wanted to see if that thing would compile on my box.
>
> If I observe all these changes going into CVS I am wondering how you
> guys keep up that pace and
Hi
reading along this list for quite some time finally got me to the point
that I wanted to see if that thing would compile on my box.
If I observe all these changes going into CVS I am wondering how you
guys keep up that pace and I am pretty sure you can't start from cratch
all the time unless y
Hi,
I have checked the updated buildimage.pl into CVS, along with (so far)
one example configuration file. The main change is handling of multiple
kernel variants. There is also some preparation for PXELINUX images.
Usage is as before. For example:
$ fakeroot ./buildimage.pl --image=Bering-u
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 19:25:34 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 22:28 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, 22:14:53 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:49 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> > > > Hi all.
> > > > I asked in other thread abou
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 19:05:37 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:31 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I've migrated from 3.x to 4.x and copied /etc/modules.conf to have a
> > working setup ASAP. Therefor I wasn't aware of the huge improvements in
> > the modu
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 22:28 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. November 2010, 22:14:53 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:49 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > > I asked in other thread about this, but IMHO question is enough
> > > important to create separate topi
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 18:31 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I've migrated from 3.x to 4.x and copied /etc/modules.conf to have a working
> setup ASAP. Therefor I wasn't aware of the huge improvements in the modules
> area.
>
> I start to realize that "modules autoloading" works better t
11.11.2010 19:31, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi;
>
> I've migrated from 3.x to 4.x and copied /etc/modules.conf to have a working
> setup ASAP. Therefor I wasn't aware of the huge improvements in the modules
> area.
>
> I start to realize that "modules autoloading" works better than I expected. In
>
Hi;
I've migrated from 3.x to 4.x and copied /etc/modules.conf to have a working
setup ASAP. Therefor I wasn't aware of the huge improvements in the modules
area.
I start to realize that "modules autoloading" works better than I expected. In
fact I thought running hwdetect is needed. But that'
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:31:17 schrieb Per Sjoholm:
> ntpd won't adjust the clock if the time diff is to big.
>
> Try using ntpdate to set time before trying to adjust time with ntpd.
>
> /Per
Per,
this is (almost) true for the real ntpd, busybox ntpd applet does set the time
if ne
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 16:16:10 schrieb Andrew:
> 11.11.2010 14:04, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:04:20 schrieb Andrew:
> >> Hi all.
> >> I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't
> >> set system time:
> >>
> >> # ntpd -d -n
11.11.2010 14:04, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:04:20 schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi all.
>> I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't
>> set system time:
>>
>> # ntpd -d -n -p 10.255.0.2
>> ntpd: sent query to 10.255.0.2
>> ntpd: reply from 10.255
ntpd won't adjust the clock if the time diff is to big.
Try using ntpdate to set time before trying to adjust time with ntpd.
/Per
On 2010-11-11 12:04, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
> I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't
> set system time:
>
> # ntpd -d -n -p 10.255.0.
Am Donnerstag, 11. November 2010, 12:04:20 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi all.
> I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't
> set system time:
>
> # ntpd -d -n -p 10.255.0.2
> ntpd: sent query to 10.255.0.2
> ntpd: reply from 10.255.0.2: reach 0x01 offset -10.105435 delay 0.003906
Hi all.
I tried to test bb ntpd how it works. Unfortunatelly, for me it can't
set system time:
# ntpd -d -n -p 10.255.0.2
ntpd: sent query to 10.255.0.2
ntpd: reply from 10.255.0.2: reach 0x01 offset -10.105435 delay 0.003906
status 0x24 strat 4 refid 0x0c00ff0a rootdelay 0.009506
ntpd: sent que
16 matches
Mail list logo
