Hi all;
I think we've made enough steps forward to 4.1 to build a first beta, but I'm
not shure if we do have showstoppers, which can be solved or has to be moved
to a later version.
David, do we need to wait for your work on isc-dhcp? I guess it can be done
later...
Andrew, I saw that you co
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011, 21:23:16 schrieb Martin Hejl:
> Hi kp,
>
> which branch did you commit it to? That was the main reason I didn't
> commit it myself - the change seemed harmless enough, but I didn't
> really know where to commit it - the maintenance branch for 4.0 or
> directly to HEAD, o
Hi kp,
which branch did you commit it to? That was the main reason I didn't
commit it myself - the change seemed harmless enough, but I didn't
really know where to commit it - the maintenance branch for 4.0 or
directly to HEAD, or to both (and if the latter, how would one do that?).
Short vers
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011, 19:53:17 schrieb Martin Hejl:
> Hi everybody,
>
> it appears that the busybox version of inetd doesn't create a pidfile,
> hence "svi inetd stop" doesn't work (and "svi inted start" doesn't
> notice it's already running).
>
> The attached patch seems to fix the issue fo
Hi everybody,
it appears that the busybox version of inetd doesn't create a pidfile,
hence "svi inetd stop" doesn't work (and "svi inted start" doesn't
notice it's already running).
The attached patch seems to fix the issue for me
Martin
--
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy
