Hi all.
At least I've got an idea how to easily maintain different targets with
different kernels, and how to simplify config/patches/etc storing with
minimum modifications of logic.
I've moved kernel version into make/toolchain/.mk, and added
__TOOLCHAIN__, __KVER__ and __KBRANCH__ macro handlin
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 18:00:08 schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Le 6 janv. 2014 à 17:31, KP Kirchdörfer a
écrit :
> > Hi Yves;
> >
> > I knew I made something wrong :)
> > Because of that I started only with the "old" maint branch, which I hoped
> > wouldn’t be that harmful, and didn't touch anythi
Le 6 janv. 2014 à 17:31, KP Kirchdörfer a écrit :
> Hi Yves;
>
> I knew I made something wrong :)
> Because of that I started only with the "old" maint branch, which I hoped
> wouldn’t be that harmful, and didn't touch anything else.
>
It hard to break (not recoverable) in git.
> The main id
Hi Yves;
I knew I made something wrong :)
Because of that I started only with the "old" maint branch, which I hoped
wouldn't be that harmful, and didn't touch anything else.
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 10:34:30 schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Hi kp,
>
> no « renaming » branch is not the right thing to
Le 6 janv. 2014 à 16:33, Erich Titl a écrit :
> If the central repository gets changed structurally, what needs to be
> done to the peripheral copies, are they just magically modified?
>
If we only fast-forward central repository branches nothing specific things is
needed to be done locally.
Hi Yves
on 06.01.2014 13:00, Yves Blusseau wrote:
>
> Le 6 janv. 2014 à 11:07, Erich Titl a écrit :
>
>> Hi Yves
>>
> Hi Erich
>
>> All this sounds fine for the central repository, would you mind to
>> elaborate this for the distributed (workspace) repositories? What is the
>> canonical way di
Le 6 janv. 2014 à 11:07, Erich Titl a écrit :
> Hi Yves
>
Hi Erich
> All this sounds fine for the central repository, would you mind to
> elaborate this for the distributed (workspace) repositories? What is the
> canonical way distribute the new repository structure?
>
I don’t understand, you
Hi Yves
on 06.01.2014 10:34, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> Hi kp,
>
> no « renaming » branch is not the right thing to do. Also removing
> integration branches on the repository is not a good idea :D
>
> It seems there a problem has my local maint branch is now not « attach » to a
> remote maint bran
Hi kp,
no « renaming » branch is not the right thing to do. Also removing integration
branches on the repository is not a good idea :D
It seems there a problem has my local maint branch is now not « attach » to a
remote maint branch (do you remove or change the maint branch) ?
In any case we o
