Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Am 15.03.2016 um 20:41 schrieb Andrew: > I'm not sure that it's really will be a big difference between all > CS553x drivers enabled and CS5535-only driver... By building a device specific subarch we can also save quite a bit in storage, as modules.sqfs may be dramatically smaller. cheers ET

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Hi Andrew Am 15.03.2016 um 20:41 schrieb Andrew: > I'm not sure that it's really will be a big difference between all > CS553x drivers enabled and CS5535-only driver... Right, it does not make much of a difference, maybe 30K. -rw-rw-r-- 1 mega mega 2079760 Mar 15 15:24 linux-alix -rw-rw-r-- 1 m

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

I'm not sure that it's really will be a big difference between all CS553x drivers enabled and CS5535-only driver... 15.03.2016 18:32, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi KP > > Am 15.03.2016 um 17:28 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: >> Hi Erich; >> > ... >> Just to be clear I don't argue against a seperate WRAP image

[leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

...there are more of us that are using WRAP/ALIX/Geode :-) Best regards Jorn On 15. mars 2016 18:03, Erich Titl wrote: > Am 15.03.2016 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > ... > >>> That is fine. But then I _believe_ the geodes all use the same PATA >>> companion ch

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Am 15.03.2016 um 17:48 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... >> >> That is fine. But then I _believe_ the geodes all use the same PATA >> companion chips, so we might really restrict them there too. Seeing the >> difference in size, it hardly matters. I just don't like to include dead >> code. > > Ok, you

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Am Dienstag, 15. März 2016, 17:32:55 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 15.03.2016 um 17:28 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > ... > > > Just to be clear I don't argue against a seperate WRAP image, until it's > > proofed to be outdated by download stats. > > But I'm questioning seperate

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Hi KP Am 15.03.2016 um 17:28 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > ... > > Just to be clear I don't argue against a seperate WRAP image, until it's > proofed to be outdated by download stats. > But I'm questioning seperate images for ALIX and Geode. That is fine. But then I _believe_ the geod

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 15. März 2016, 16:38:15 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 15.03.2016 um 16:17 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > ... > > > Hi Erich; > > > > what's the difference between the alix specific kernel and the geode > > kernel? > Tha ALIX kernel has just one single PATA adapter. All t

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Hi KP Am 15.03.2016 um 16:17 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... > Hi Erich; > > what's the difference between the alix specific kernel and the geode kernel? Tha ALIX kernel has just one single PATA adapter. All the other storage drivers are absent. > > Will the difference justify a seperate image?

Re: [leaf-devel] ALIX specific kernel

Am Montag, 14. März 2016, 14:15:30 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I am trying to build a specific kernel for the ALIX board, but I am > failing configuring the CS553x ATA driver into the kernel, e.g. the > driver can be enabled as a module but menuconfig does not allow it to be > compiled into

Re: [leaf-devel] uboot compile broken (update)

Am 15.03.2016 um 10:01 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > the uboot compile breaks in new-initrd-6.x probably due to the compiler > being gcc5 > > /home/mega/leaf/devel/bering-6/source/armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi/uboot/u-boot-2013.01.01/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:87:30: > fatal error: l

[leaf-devel] uboot compile broken

Hi Folks the uboot compile breaks in new-initrd-6.x probably due to the compiler being gcc5 /home/mega/leaf/devel/bering-6/source/armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi/uboot/u-boot-2013.01.01/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:87:30: fatal error: linux/compiler-gcc5.h: No such file or directory compilati