2002-10-20
-
BF
-
-initial revison
+initial revision
@@ -50,8 +53,21 @@
floppy drive during setup.
Comments on this section should be sent to Brad Fritz at
-bradfritz at users.sourceforge.net. This is revision
-$Revision: 1.6 $. Please i
Bering-uClibc 2.1, and possibly several other LEAF variants, have
a bug in POSIXness.mail triggered when the "-v" option to the mail
command is used. Here's an example of the bug in action:
firewall# mail -v -s "This is a test" [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
[..]
4: 250 RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PR
Looks like the "Tarball" link under "CVS Repository" in the menu
sidebar at http://leaf-project.org/ is broken. It links to:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.gz
but the correct URL seems to be:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2
--Brad
-
Tom,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:40:11 PST Tom Eastep wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Tom Eastep wrote:
>
> >
> > And note that this only works for files that contain shell commands like
> > /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf, /etc/shorewall/params,
> > /etc/shorewall/start, etc. It does not work for fi
Tom,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:20:06 PST Tom Eastep wrote:
> Before I wrap up 1.4.2 and begin thinking about 2.0, is there anything
> else that people believe is needed that can't wait until 2.0? I would
> prefer that you not request integration with other products in 1.4 as I
> believe that the
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:47:56 +0530 S Mohan wrote:
> I want to run a Java App on Bering and build a dedicated, robust embedded
> box for a specific purpose. How do I do this? Is java available as an lrp on
> Bering?
I doubt there are pre-made LEAF packages available, especially if
you want Sun's
Thank you Eric...
On Fri, 07 Feb 2003 08:59:42 GMT Eric Spakman wrote:
> > Does anyone have a module tarball available that is compatible
> > with the stock Bering-uClibc 1.1 kernel?
> Brad,
>
> I'm at work and using webmail, so I can't cc to the list.
I am copying them back in to archive th
Good evening,
Does anyone have a module tarball available that is compatible
with the stock Bering-uClibc 1.1 kernel? I didn't see one in
CVS, but I may have overlooked it.
I am building a kernel and modules using the instructions[1],
but a ready-made tarball would make it easier to play with t
Mike,
On 17 Jan 2003 08:07:51 PST Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> Our lists are now being archived at MARC in addition to SF and the Mail
> Archive.
Excellent! MARC has a very thorough search algorithm. In my
opinion, even better than mail-archive and definitely better than
Sourceforge. Ther
This
http://speed.vpizza.org/~jmeehan/balloon/
article about a fellow who launched a weather balloon running
Bering on a Soekris net4511 was recently linked to from the
Soekris tech list[1] and Slashdot[2]. Thought some of you
might find it interesting.
--Brad
[1] http://lists.soekris.com/p
Arne, Eric, and KP,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:21:17 +0100 kapeka wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2003 06:53 schrieb Brad Fritz:
>
> > I did find one very minor problem with the dhcpd package in the
> > uClibc 1.1 image. /var/lib/lrpkg/dhcpd.exclude.list was missing
> &
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:56:00 +0100 Jacques wrote:
> Le Mardi 14 Janvier 2003 17:37, Brad Fritz a écrit :
> > Looks like many (or all?) of the Bering 2.4.20 modules [..]
> > are not stripped. Was that intentional?
[..]
> Hi Brad
> Your suggestion would indeed save
Looks like many (or all?) of the Bering 2.4.20 modules at
http://leaf.sf.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/2.4.20
are not stripped. Was that intentional? Stripping them
would save a fair amount of space:
brad@blacklab:/tmp$ ls -s1 /tmp/*.o
16 /tmp/3c509.o
76 /tmp/hostap.o
4 /
Variant: Bering uClibc v1.1
Package: lshd
Looks like there is an "rm -f $PIDFILE" missing in the "restart"
case of /etc/init.d/lshd . Without it the pid file is not removed
when lshd is stopped and it fails to restart with the error:
Pid file '/var/run/lshd.pid' already exists.
lshd seems
First let me say congratulations and thank you to everyone who
contributed directly and indirectly to the uClibc version of
Bering. Wow! I was able to fit shorewall, pump, dnscache,
tinydns, pcmcia_orinoco, the 3c509 module, dhcpd, weblet and
lshd (which supports public key authentication) all o
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:16:13 +0100 you wrote:
> Le Vendredi 10 Janvier 2003 20:13, Brad Fritz a écrit :
>
> > The subsections in busers.html :
>
> > do not match those in budiskonchip.html :
> OK fixed. Thanks for spotting the bug.
Tha
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:03:29 +0100 Jacques Nilo wrote:
> Le Vendredi 10 Janvier 2003 18:00, Brad Fritz a écrit :
> > FYI mostly for Jacques...
> >
> > I just noticed the User Guide table of contents at
> >
> > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/busers.htm
FYI mostly for Jacques...
I just noticed the User Guide table of contents at
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/busers.html
is out-of-sync with (at least) the DoC chapter which causes the
name anchor links to fail.
--Brad
---
This S
Jacques,
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:41:46 +0100 Jacques wrote:
> The full story is here:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/article.php?sid=65
Very cool! Thank you, Jacques. Quick question...
It looks like freeswan support is included as well, even though
the freeswan patch isn't listed in the patche
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:39:40 PST leaf-Patches-641523 wrote:
> I noticed a few typos in qmail.xml[1] for the qmail.lrp
> howto[2].
> The attached patch would fix the ones I noticed.
The direct link to the unified diff is
http://sf.net/tracker/download.php?group_id=13751&atid=313751&file_id=35
Luigi,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:53:16 +0100 Luigi wrote:
> sed: Couldn't open file TMP_/tmp/EXCLUDE
> Creating sshd.lrp Please wait: \tar: /tmp/EXCLUDE: No such file
> or directory
> rm: cannot remove `/tmp/EXCLUDE': No such file or directory
>
> I'm not strong on sed&scripting, but it seems the
On 23 Oct 2002 17:29:59 MST Mike wrote:
> Here is what SF may do in the future.
>
> Exim SpamAssassin at SMTP time
> http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
For what it's worth, I run spamassassin locally and it caught
the "Multimedia Design at 5$ per hour" email. Details below
my signature
Kelly,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:08:11 GMT Kelly Brown wrote:
> Brad,
>
> Thank you so much for pointing me in the right direction.
Glad to help.
> I have my shell script, "toggle_udp", which checks to see if
> ip_masq_udp_dloose is set to 0, and if so, it sets it to 1 (and vice-versa).
>
> I
Marck,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:32:58 -0400 Mark Meade wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> Your instructions look great -- well written and concise.
Thank you for taking the time to read my work and make
suggestions.
> One suggestion: the mtd modules in 2.4.18 won't work with any DiskOnChip
> devices form
Minor typo correction below...
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:40:26 EST I wrote:
[snip]
> > I made a tiny little script to do this, but it doesn't work. It runs, but
> > the ip_masq_udp_dloose file never changes
[snip]
> I think the most secure solution would be to write a minimal
> C program that se
Kelly,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:58:30 GMT Kelly Brown wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'll admit right up front that I'm not very knowledgeable in regards to
> Linux, so I hope I don't come off sounding TOO foolish. I do a lot of web
> development, so I do know my way around a unix/linux environment som
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:46:53 -0400 Mark Meade wrote:
> Brad Fritz wrote:
> > Just to confirm, can you mount the same partition, e.g. nftla1 ,
> > twice simultaneously with the versions in 2.4.19? I only ask
> > because your original test was mounting two separate partitio
Thank you for the additional information, Mark. Just one final
question inline...
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:10:56 -0400 Mark Meade wrote:
> > Actually, the same partition is mounted twice like this:
> >
> > mount /dev/nftla1 /mnt/doc1
> > mount /dev/nftla1 /mnt/doc2
> >
> > If you are able
I recently installed Bering on a M-Systems DiskOnChip 2000 and
documented the process for inclusion in the Bering User's Guide.
The most recent draft in HTML is at
http://fritzfam.com/brad/leaftmp/budiskonchip
DocBook source is also available[1].
If anyone has comments or suggestions to shar
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:41:57 +0200 you wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> Success, I got the SST/Apacer ADM modified for write protection working.
> Anyone interested in the details here is a link to what I did
> http://luna.think.ch/leaf/ADM.
Very nice work!
One think puzzled me though. You stated
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:06:01 +0200 Jacques wrote:
> Le Mercredi 16 Octobre 2002 07:34, Brad Fritz a écrit :
> > Jacques, do you already have a volunteer for a User's Guide
> > chapter on running Bering from DoC?
>
> No, but I would welcome one. Send me your cont
While trying to get Bering to boot from a DoC, I ran into a hurdle
that has been discussed before but never resolved in a way that
would prevent new DoC users from struggling with it.
The Bering rc3 modules for MTD DiskOnChip and NFTL do not allow
concurrent mounting of the same device in multip
Apologies if this has already been reported. I searched
leaf-user and leaf-devel and didn't see it.
As noted at
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2002-October/006181.html
the /dev/nftla* entries are incorrect. They have major
number 3 but should have major number 93.
Jacques, do
you think of anything else that might cause a problem and I
> will go ahead and test it.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:23 PM
> To: Eric B Kiser
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:03:33 -0400 Eric Kiser wrote:
> Just wanted to close this issue with a little more finality. I decided not
> to mess with the COW files right now and used the exact same script for each
> instance of Bering UML.
Since Bering runs from a ram disk and the boot file system i
Hello Eric,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 20:03:47 -0400 Eric Kiser wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working with bering1.0-rc3 and using it in a UML environment. I wanting
> to be able to boot up multiple bering file systems and be able to modify
> them and save the changes. In the UML documentation it says t
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 06:55:56 +0700 H. D. Lee wrote:
> Great. May be this will be a good reason to incorporate IP_VS into
> Bering or Dachstein kernel.
Even if it's not included, the build-from-source approach being
discussed should make it easy for interested parties to roll their
own kernel an
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:28:47 +0700 H. D. Lee wrote:
> List,
>
> I am on a very early step of a project to build Linux High Availability
> with Load Balancing Clusters using LVS[0] and other tools. I will use
> LEAF Bering or Dachstein for the directors.
Sounds interesting.
> Is there any chan
On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 13:54:44 -0400 Eric Kiser wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> Thanks for all the information. I did notice that in your boot sequence it
> showed that you are using mconsole (version 2). Mine shows mconsole (version
> 1). Where did you get yours? I used the .rpm off of the UML site.
It's
Eric,
On Mon, 09 Sep 2002 11:18:57 -0400 Eric Kiser wrote:
> Okay, I must be doing something wrong and just don't realize it. I have
> followed the direction listed in the online documentation multiple times and
> I am still not getting anywhere. I did quite a bit of searching over the
> weeken
Eric,
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 22:35:10 +0200 Eric wrote:
> Hello Developers ,
>
> I use a Bering RC3 on a 486 DX 66 with 3 nics, which I administer
> with ssh.
> Recently I noticed a fast increasing of the pid numbers, that I couldn't
> understand.
> After rebooting I stopped all services excep
On Fri, 09 Aug 2002 09:48:08 CDT mds wrote:
> Anybody care to shed light on the flurry of changes in openssl since
> last week?
I don't have the full scoop, but I think these include fixes to
the vulnerabilities found during the DARPA CHATS audit of OpenSSL.
A search for "openssl" at http://sec
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:26:28 CDT Shaun Feakes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having real difficulties compiling applications for LEAF, this is
> due to my setup, I am sure.
> Redhat 7.3 using glibc2.0 compat from Redhat 6.x to produce binaries
> for 5.x (Should work with linux 2.2.x)
>
> Anyway, I jus
On 17 Jul 2002 10:24:21 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
> Brad,
> Thanks for the proof. The broken pipe may have been a coincidence, but I
> thought I should check before trying this again.
Almost always better to be safe than sorry, I suppose. :)
> My diff doesn't look right (diff output below). The s
On 17 Jul 2002 09:11:44 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
> Hmm, then what did I do wrong in rev 1.2? I used vi to dd out the lines
> below, and you ended up with a broken pipe from the server last night.
I am not sure about the broken pipe, but if you need more
evidence it *should* work, see below. My ap
again everyone.
Sincerely,
Brad Fritz
key fp: BEF3 1F93 9399 FD8B A7AA 932D B9A6 D18E 7E69 9F03
[1] http://athome.compaq.com/showroom/static/ipaq/intappliance.asp
msg05069/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 10:02:25 EDT Steven Nickle wrote:
> I saw in the archive, that several people are running Bering with glibc
> 2.2.x. Is there documentation on the conversion or packages available?
>
> It would make my development effort easier.
The best docs I have seen so far are Simon B
Taking a shot in the dark here...
On Fri, 17 May 2002 12:59:54 PDT you wrote:
> Yes, I have the correct modules loaded.
Including ide-mod, ide-probe-mod, and ide-disk stored in initrd's
/boot/lib/modules and listed in /boot/etc/modules ? If so, does
the output when they load look right? Here
On 13 Apr 2002 08:33:44 PDT Mike Noyes wrote:
> Anyone,
> Is there a way to get tar to return the date of the most recent file in
> a tarball?
>
> Example:
> $ tar tvzf leaf/devel/ddouthitt/packages/cal.lrp
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root 9648 2001-12-17 06:42:08 usr/bin/cal
> -rw-r--r-- root/root
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:58:07 PST Chat wrote:
> New to the list :) using Dach 102 LRP-CD . Need snort.lrp (1.8.3 :)
> compiled with mysql (./configure --with-mysql) in order to connect to
> DEMARC central database from my new LEAF node NIDS :)
[..]
> Appreciate your help as i really dont
oot/root 2181 2000-08-13 17:29:35 lib/POSIXness/POSIXness.text
(permission output stripped to prevent wrapping)
Great job with Dachstein, Charles! I converted my home firewall
over the weekend and, POSIXness mail aside, things are working great.
--Brad Fritz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
51 matches
Mail list logo
