Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-05-01 Thread George Metz
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... Heh. Everyone else has taken the good stuff. I suppose you could try coding and such when you're supposed to be sleeping; I hear that such events are

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-30 Thread Jacques Nilo
> There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... > > Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. Hi David! I only found your post today and just wanted to congratule you (and the mother as well :-) ) for this great even

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail,a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-30 Thread Ewald Wasscher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... > > Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. > (ask your wives if that's big :-) Congratulations! And I don't have to ask to know that's _

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-30 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello David > There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... > > Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. > (ask your wives if that's big :-) Congratulations from me too . The best wishes to you and your family.

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-30 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... > > Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. > (ask your wives if that's big :-) Congratulations David! Best wishes for your newest addition and the rest of your f

[OT] Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Dale Long
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Andrew came in about three pushes :O came so fast that he wound up > bruised a bit, but none the worse for the wear. I caught one of mine shooting out. They can be quite slippery. Dale. ___ Leaf-devel m

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Dale Long
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Paul Batozech wrote: > Congratulations!! I have the feeling you'll be doing plenty in the > foreseeable future, just not much with Oxygen:) A little late-night coding between feeds and nappy changes works well. Dale. ___ Leaf-dev

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 5:29, Dale Long wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Ooph! I don't have to. Is there a infant blue ox in the back yard > > > as well? > > > > No blue oxes :-) but his older brother was 10 lbs. 2 oz. at birth :-) > > How long was the labour for both of

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Paul Batozech
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... > > Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. > (ask your wives if that's big :-) David Congratulations!! I have the feeling you'll be doi

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Dale Long
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ooph! I don't have to. Is there a infant blue ox in the back yard > > as well? > > No blue oxes :-) but his older brother was 10 lbs. 2 oz. at birth :-) How long was the labour for both of them? Ouch. Dale.

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
On 30 Apr 2001, at 5:04, Ray Olszewski wrote: > At 10:37 PM 4/29/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. > >(ask your wives if that's big :-) > > Ooph! I don't have to. Is there a infant blue ox in the back yard > as well? No

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-29 22:37 -0500 >There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a >lot in the next week or so... > >Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. >(ask your wives if that's big :-) David, Congratulations! Take it easy and enjoy y

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a > lot in the next week or so... > Heh heh. You really think everything will be back to normal in a week :-) > Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. >

Re: [Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 10:37 PM 4/29/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a >lot in the next week or so... In a pig's eye, you're not. You just won't be doing the stuff you usually tell us about. Congratulations, David. >Andrew James was born 22 Apri

[Leaf-devel] A little less mail, a little less Oxygen development....

2001-04-29 Thread ssrat
There is a new baby in the house so I'm not going to be doing a lot in the next week or so... Andrew James was born 22 April 2001 at 7:25 am, and was 9 lbs. 4 oz. (ask your wives if that's big :-) Current outstanding development concerns: * Both Oxygen versions (glibc 2.0.7 and 2.1.3) hav