At 11:52 AM 10/18/01 -0400, David Douthitt wrote:
>What would you consider to be the smallest and largest valid netmask
>that contains IP addresses? I thought it would be /2 and /30, but it
>turns out Class K is 222.x.x.x/31 and 223.x.x.x/31.
>
>How can they do that? With a netmask of /31 have o
What would you consider to be the smallest and largest valid netmask
that contains IP addresses? I thought it would be /2 and /30, but it
turns out Class K is 222.x.x.x/31 and 223.x.x.x/31.
How can they do that? With a netmask of /31 have one bit for hosts. If
you remove the broadcast IP (bit