Am 10.02.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> It appears that sourceforge changed access policies today. Could someone
> comment please.
>
The problem appears to be that sourceforge is redirecting http requests
partially to https. Not all sourceforge hosts support https though, so a
Hi Folks
It appears that sourceforge changed access policies today. Could someone
comment please.
SALT# wget -v
http://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/master/tree/stable?format=raw
--2016-02-10 21:14:32--
http://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/master/tree/stable?format=raw
Resolving sourcef
Everyone,
Ken Langone sold SF to Dice.
Dice Holdings, Inc. Acquires Online Media Business From Geeknet, Inc.
http://sourceforge.net/blog/dice-holdings-inc-acquires-online-media-business-from-geeknet-inc/
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes
https://plus.google.com/u/0/1133647801580
GitHub, Collaboration, and Haters
Posted on Friday, June 3rd, 2011 by Elizabeth Naramore
http://sourceforge.net/blog/github-collaboration-and-haters/
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes
https://www.google.com/profiles/mhnoyes
-
All consultants,
You may find the new feature SF plans to roll-out useful. If you're
interested follow the link below.
https://ostg.wufoo.com/forms/marketplace-interest-list/
Note: the link above is legitimate. SF is utilizing a
third party to gather inform
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 12:21, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. Januar 2006 20:45 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > I'll try to install Mediawiki on SF this week. I hope it's used for FAQs
> > and small HOWTOs, and replaces our old docmanager/c0wz content.
> >
> > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/l
Mike Noyes wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 05:16, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I've got my new server online, and am working on getting my LEAF mirror
up and running again.
Charles,
Excellent news. :-)
The first problem I've run into is a permissions problem. I cannot
access the phpwebsite/imag
Am Montag, 16. Januar 2006 20:45 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 05:16, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Everyone,
> I'll try to install Mediawiki on SF this week. I hope it's used for FAQs
> and small HOWTOs, and replaces our old docmanager/c0wz content.
>
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/vie
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 05:16, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> I've got my new server online, and am working on getting my LEAF mirror
> up and running again.
Charles,
Excellent news. :-)
> The first problem I've run into is a permissions problem. I cannot
> access the phpwebsite/images/announce d
I've got my new server online, and am working on getting my LEAF mirror
up and running again.
The first problem I've run into is a permissions problem. I cannot
access the phpwebsite/images/announce directory, which does not have
group read permissions:
-bash-2.05b$ ls -ld phpwebsite/images
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:41, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Either way, your SR should
> > be attended to by one of the SF staff members shortly.
>
> No particular hurry -- I've turned off SPF screening in my MTA until the
> problem is resolved.
Tom,
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Either way, your SR should
> be attended to by one of the SF staff members shortly.
No particular hurry -- I've turned off SPF screening in my MTA until the
problem is resolved.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:32 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:33, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > At http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php, I see SPF mentioned 6 times
> > (including my own report).
>
> Tom,
> Thanks for the aid. I'll monitor it.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/sup
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:33, Tom Eastep wrote:
> At http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php, I see SPF mentioned 6 times
> (including my own report).
Tom,
Thanks for the aid. I'll monitor it.
https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1075459
I suspect SPF still isn't implemented a
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:31 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:10, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > In case you are unaware, the current SPF configuration of
> > lists.sourceforge.net is hosed. As a result, SPF-aware MTAs are
> > rejecting all list traffic. There are many open trouble reports
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 11:10, Tom Eastep wrote:
> In case you are unaware, the current SPF configuration of
> lists.sourceforge.net is hosed. As a result, SPF-aware MTAs are
> rejecting all list traffic. There are many open trouble reports on this
> issue (including the one I just opened after I inv
Everyone,
This is just a reminder. SF has a Debian 2.2 box available for your use.
Compile Farm instructions are in the document below.
SourceForge Compile Farm
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1
Let me know if you find it useful. Thanks.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL P
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Hmm...if the 2.2.19 stuff isn't on the CD, can you give me a list of the
> patches you applied to whatever you consider the 'most standard' Oxygen
> kernel?
Ah. The standard base set is:
init-rd
linuxrc-always
openwall
The secondaries would be:
bridge+firewall
.
> > When I get the Oxygen CD burned, hopefully I'll have the kernel patches
I've
> > been looking for, although it's kind of a drag downloading 578 Meg just
for
> > some patches...missing that extra D/L bandwidth I got with my ADSL line
> > right about now :<
>
> I'm not sure why you (of all peopl
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> When I get the Oxygen CD burned, hopefully I'll have the kernel patches I've
> been looking for, although it's kind of a drag downloading 578 Meg just for
> some patches...missing that extra D/L bandwidth I got with my ADSL line
> right about now :<
I'm not sure why
Well, I can download files from the SF releases area now. I don't know what
the problem was, but I'm assuming it was on the SF side. IIRC, I think
their part of the 'net has been under some DDOS attacks recently...
When I get the Oxygen CD burned, hopefully I'll have the kernel patches I've
bee
Everyone,
The SourceForge staff just removed our anonymous FTP area per my request.
If I have time, I'll update the "Individual Developer Content" FAQ today.
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-17 09:15 -0700
>I created a "pub" directory in our web area, and changed the pub symlink
>in htdocs to point to the n
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> New structure:
> /home/groups/l/le/leaf/pub
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub
Thanks for all the work.
Dale.
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> George,
> I just got through reading my copy. This will affect us greatly. :(
Doh. I just went through a bunch of it, and DAMN that's a lot of data.
To make your life easier Mike, just delete my directory out of hand. I
only ever put my 2.2.18 tarball an
Jonathan French, 2001-05-17 09:41 -0700
>Hi Mike,
>
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub and leaf.sf.net/pub both seem to work
>well.
Jonathan,
Thanks for checking. If we don't find any problems with my changes, I'll
ask the SF staff to remove the two remaining directory trees in our ftp
area on Mo
Hi Mike,
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub and leaf.sf.net/pub both seem to work
well.
I had put a README file in my directory, and the apache server seems to
automatially display it after the list of files. Developers may want to
take advantage of this to report what each posted file represents.
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-17 07:17 -0700
>The following developers have files in the anonymous ftp area that will
>eventually need to move into our web area.
>I'll create an admin task for this shortly. As soon as I know a timetable
>for the move I'll update the task. Again, I apologize for any
>inc
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-17 06:58 -0700
>>Please move any files in the ftp area to your individual web directory.
>>Thanks, and I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
>>
>>shell1
>>/home/groups/ftp/pub/leaf/devel/
>>/home/groups/l/le/leaf/devel/
Everyone,
The following developers have files in the
Mike Noyes, 2001-05-17 06:25 -0700
>David's Oxygen directory will need to move (David I'll take care of the
>move for you).
David,
I copied your Oyxgen directory to:
/home/groups/l/le/leaf/devel/ddouthitt
Everyone,
I moved most of our content out of the anonymous ftp area.
ToDo:
Update p
George Metz, 2001-05-17 03:45 -0400
>Okay gang, just got an e-mail from SourceForge about site changes. I
>think it's really kickass that we can use http://leaf.sf.net now, but
>one thing concerned me:
>
>"Since the download services have been ramped up to meet the evolving
>needs of our project c
On Thu, 17 May 2001, George Metz wrote:
> "Since the download services have been ramped up to meet the evolving
> needs of our project constituency, we will now be removing project FTP
> services and provide that additional bandwidth to the download servers.
> The first phase of this removal proce
Okay gang, just got an e-mail from SourceForge about site changes. I think
it's really kickass that we can use http://leaf.sf.net now, but one thing
concerned me:
"Since the download services have been ramped up to meet the evolving
needs of our project constituency, we will now be removing proje
David Douthitt, 2001-04-20 09:21 -0500
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > ~ At about 6:00am PST this morning, the SourceForge
> > ~ postgres database was corrupted and lost. We were
> > ~ able to restore from our 5AM dump, so minimal data
> > ~ loss occurred.
>
>That would be 9:00am CDT? Or did they forget t
Mike Noyes wrote:
> I knew something strange was going on yesterday morning. Here is the
> explanation. Let me know if you made any modifications to our site during
> this hour.
Don't think I did...
> ~ At about 6:00am PST this morning, the SourceForge
> ~ postgres database was corrupted and lo
Everyone,
I knew something strange was going on yesterday morning. Here is the
explanation. Let me know if you made any modifications to our site during
this hour.
~ Posted By: bigdisk
~ Date: 2001-04-19 08:55
~ Summary:SourceForge Database Restored
~
~ At about 6:00am PST this morning, the Sou
Everyone deserves a huge pat on the back. Our project continues to move up
the SourceForge rankings. We broke into the top 200 active projects on the
7th. In addition, Google searches for "embedded appliance" and "appliance
firewall" return our project as the first link. Statistics follow.
Dat
I've emailed him off the list. So far no response. But he also has been
silent on the WISP list since yesterday afternoon. He's probably busy.
Mike Sensney, 2001-03-07 11:54 -0800
>At 11:39 AM 03/07/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote
>
>>Everyone,
>>Is anyone able to connect to our website, or ssh into shell1?
>
>Yes to both. You can't get it???
Mike,
Thanks for checking. It looks like it was a temporary outage. BTW, have you had a
chance to
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-07 11:39 -0800
>Everyone,
>Is anyone able to connect to our website, or ssh into shell1?
Never mind. It looks like SF rebooted the server for some reason. Everything is
working again.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
__
>Everyone,
>Is anyone able to connect to our website, or ssh into shell1?
Yes to both. You can't get it???
No problem to the web site.
Bao
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Noyes
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge ssh & website
>
>
>
Everyone,
Is anyone able to connect to our website, or ssh into shell1?
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
At 07:52 AM 2/7/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Everyone,
>Beware, the LDAP migration is causing problems. SourceForge is going live
>with LDAP for ssh. I can't login currently and reports are coming in that
>file ownerships are wrong.
>
>I'll keep everyone updated on ssh status.
I'm able to ssh into she
Everyone,
Beware, the LDAP migration is causing problems. SourceForge is going live
with LDAP for ssh. I can't login currently and reports are coming in that
file ownerships are wrong.
I'll keep everyone updated on ssh status.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
__
Current SourceForge Service Status Report
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
MAJOR UPGRADE HAPPENING WEDNESDAY JAN 17th: We will be performing our
migration to a LDAP-based authentication during our normally scheduled
maintentance window (Wednesdays 1 am - 3 am
Everyone,
SourceForge now has a status page. :)
I don't know if the docid will change, but a link called "Site Status" is
located under "SourceForge" on the menu bar.
Current SourceForge Service Status Report
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
--
Mike Noyes <[E
At 03:02 PM 1/5/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 11:57 AM 1/5/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Everyone,
>>SourceForge is experiencing some problems. The email lists aren't
>>archiving at present, and ftp connection attempts to
>>upload.sourceforge.net/incomin
At 11:57 AM 1/5/01 -0800, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Everyone,
>SourceForge is experiencing some problems. The email lists aren't
>archiving at present, and ftp connection attempts to
>upload.sourceforge.net/incoming are timing out. Apache will not display
>project sub directories w
Everyone,
SourceForge is experiencing some problems. The email lists aren't archiving
at present, and ftp connection attempts to upload.sourceforge.net/incoming
are timing out. Apache will not display project sub directories without
index files in them.
All three problems have support requests
> They also created a new theme.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=55761
I really like the new theme. It loads much faster (even on a high-speed
link), and gets rid of the light-blue on grey text I could never read (now
light-blue on white...not ideal, but much better).
Charle
Everyone,
SourceForge just released this status update.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=55742
They also created a new theme.
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=55761
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
__
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Mike Noyes wrote:
> At 02:42 PM 12/17/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
> > > Paul & George,
> > > It's probably a problem with the new LDAP server. You're not the only
> > > ones experiencing this problem. see:
> > >
> > > https://sourceforge
For a download test I pulled from one of the servers at work - OC-3
connection - and was able to get ~125KBytes/sec via HTTP/Lynx and
~155Kbytes/sec via ftp. That's enough to max my DSL line, which is good
enough for me. Test file was the EigerStein2BETA package archive, and it
was performed at ap
At 06:02 02-12-2000 -0800, you wrote:
>At 10:17 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>At 08:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> >
>>BTW, you asked me about downloads. After the site came back up (around 6
>>PM PST, that I noticed), I downloaded the new (November) Oxyg
At 10:17 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 08:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >
>BTW, you asked me about downloads. After the site came back up (around 6
>PM PST, that I noticed), I downloaded the new (November) Oxygen .bin
>images from the download page and
At 08:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>SF seems to be working again. I expect we will have more problems in the
>next couple of weeks. Hopefully, they wont be as bad as today. The messages
>sent while SF was having problems are probably in a cue somewhere. So,
>there will probably be som
SF seems to be working again. I expect we will have more problems in the
next couple of weeks. Hopefully, they wont be as bad as today. The messages
sent while SF was having problems are probably in a cue somewhere. So,
there will probably be some out of sequence mail tomorrow.
In case anyone
57 matches
Mail list logo
