Re: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge Relocation to Exodus

2000-12-02 Thread Wolfstar
For a download test I pulled from one of the servers at work - OC-3 connection - and was able to get ~125KBytes/sec via HTTP/Lynx and ~155Kbytes/sec via ftp. That's enough to max my DSL line, which is good enough for me. Test file was the EigerStein2BETA package archive, and it was performed at ap

Re: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge Relocation to Exodus

2000-12-02 Thread Pedro Barreto
At 06:02 02-12-2000 -0800, you wrote: >At 10:17 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>At 08:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >> > >>BTW, you asked me about downloads. After the site came back up (around 6 >>PM PST, that I noticed), I downloaded the new (November) Oxyg

Re: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge Relocation to Exodus

2000-12-02 Thread Mike Noyes
At 10:17 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 08:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: > > >BTW, you asked me about downloads. After the site came back up (around 6 >PM PST, that I noticed), I downloaded the new (November) Oxygen .bin >images from the download page and

Re: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge Relocation to Exodus

2000-12-02 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 08:32 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >SF seems to be working again. I expect we will have more problems in the >next couple of weeks. Hopefully, they wont be as bad as today. The messages >sent while SF was having problems are probably in a cue somewhere. So, >there will probably be som

[Leaf-devel] SourceForge Relocation to Exodus

2000-12-01 Thread Mike Noyes
SF seems to be working again. I expect we will have more problems in the next couple of weeks. Hopefully, they wont be as bad as today. The messages sent while SF was having problems are probably in a cue somewhere. So, there will probably be some out of sequence mail tomorrow. In case anyone