Mike Sensney wrote:
I may be missing something, but I think Mark was thinking about some
sort
of public/private key signature of the whole package, not the contents.
Interesting, but what's the point?
??Not sure what you mean?? This is what Mark asked for in his message.
My thought is
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:05:52PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Feb 2001, at 22:38, Mark Seiden wrote:
i'm about to switch to oxygen, which i've built on 2.2.18 (i
hope...) for our beta test.
Thanks for using Oxygen!
when (not if) you run out of room on a single floppy,
A quick thought about encrypting and signing. From
Schneier's _Applied Cryptography_, section 2.7, the way
to do this is to first sign the deliverable in the private
key of the distribution, and then encrypt the deliverable
*along with the signature* into a single file. So if the
package
greetings. i personally am new at this leaf thing, but:
we've been using lrp for the alpha test of a bunch of distributed
caches for publishing scholarly journals. (see www.lockss.stanford.edu
if that interests you.)
thanks for all your great work, by the way.
i'm about to switch to oxygen,
On 20 Feb 2001, at 22:38, Mark Seiden wrote:
i'm about to switch to oxygen, which i've built on 2.2.18 (i
hope...) for our beta test.
Thanks for using Oxygen!
when (not if) you run out of room on a single floppy, which
contains "trustworthy" software, how to download additional .lrps
in
On 21 Feb 2001, at 1:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:05:52PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:
Having said that, one of the things on my list of "ToDos" is to
change apkg to generate *.md5 for every file in the package for
checking purposes. This would mean:
