Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-16 Thread Andrew
16.08.2015 14:13, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Andrew > > Am 16.08.2015 um 13:10 schrieb Andrew: >> 16.08.2015 13:30, Erich Titl пишет: > > >>> >>> Or maybe a bug in accel-ppp? >>> >> Userland tools shouldn't cause kernel errors - so it's kernel bug. > > I don't know how one can accelerate ppp witho

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-16 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 16.08.2015 um 13:10 schrieb Andrew: 16.08.2015 13:30, Erich Titl пишет: Or maybe a bug in accel-ppp? Userland tools shouldn't cause kernel errors - so it's kernel bug. I don't know how one can accelerate ppp without plugging into the kernel interface, maybe with ioctl

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-16 Thread Andrew
16.08.2015 13:30, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Andrew > > Am 16.08.2015 um 12:25 schrieb Andrew: >> Hi. >> >> 16.08.2015 13:08, Erich Titl пишет: >>> Hi Andrew >>> >>> Am 15.08.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Andrew: After month of uptime I've got crash again. It seems that crash caused by shaper removin

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-16 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 16.08.2015 um 12:25 schrieb Andrew: Hi. 16.08.2015 13:08, Erich Titl пишет: Hi Andrew Am 15.08.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Andrew: After month of uptime I've got crash again. It seems that crash caused by shaper removing from ppp interface before it's deletion, which causes race condi

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-16 Thread Andrew
Hi. 16.08.2015 13:08, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Andrew > > Am 15.08.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Andrew: >> After month of uptime I've got crash again. It seems that crash caused >> by shaper removing from ppp interface before it's deletion, which causes >> race condition. > > Why does this cause a race con

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-16 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 15.08.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Andrew: After month of uptime I've got crash again. It seems that crash caused by shaper removing from ppp interface before it's deletion, which causes race condition. Why does this cause a race condition? You should be able to remove a shaper without

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-08-15 Thread Andrew
After month of uptime I've got crash again. It seems that crash caused by shaper removing from ppp interface before it's deletion, which causes race condition. I removed shaper delete from scripts, and I think that this'll fix bug. 15.07.2015 00:28, Andrew пишет: > Hi. > > I assembled build fo

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-25 Thread Andrew
Hi. I made quick kernel config review (hint: on kernel update, just make diff between old and new kernel configs for some 'etalon' arch which has config updated by hand, then - try to patch target arch config with this diff, then - just run 'make oldconfig' with obtained partially-patched conf

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-25 Thread Andrew
Hi. It works. I can't say about bug (is it present or not - due to it's random nature, 3.14 kernel box may work for weeks, or may crash twice per week), but it still works OK for 2 weeks on one box (others have less uptime). It needs to check iscsitarget (it should work with in-kernel driver,

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-25 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; Am Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2015, 00:28:20 schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > > I assembled build for 4.1.2 kernel. It works on test box for 2 days, > I'll try to update other boxes to 4.1.2 on this week. Did it solve your issues? I've installed 4.1.2 kernel on my router and it works pretty well, and

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-14 Thread Andrew
Hi. I assembled build for 4.1.2 kernel. It works on test box for 2 days, I'll try to update other boxes to 4.1.2 on this week. About troubles - pmacct is broken (I didn't look too deeply on it); iscsitaget - I switched to in-kernel driver but I don't know how test it's work (can anybody check?

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-07 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2015, 16:54:40 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 07.07.2015 um 16:06 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > ... > > > Hi Andrew; > > > > it's definitely annoying to release with a known bug; but before we switch > > to any newer kernel, have you tested a newer one that works? > > You

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-07 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 07.07.2015 um 16:06 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: ... Hi Andrew; it's definitely annoying to release with a known bug; but before we switch to any newer kernel, have you tested a newer one that works? You must be a politician, to me such an information is a show stopper. Is there a dead

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-07 Thread Andrew
Hi. Currently I'm not in city, so I still didn't tested other kernels. I plan to test 5.1 with 3.10 kernel on BRASes (possibly it also has a regression), and I plan to try to assemble 4.1 kernel (it should be long-term - http://www.itworld.com/article/2938517/linux/linux-kernel-4-1-lts-release

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-07 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 5. Juli 2015, 13:59:18 schrieb Andrew: > I've got a hangup on other 5.2-rc1 box again: > > [639661.740225] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 05040214 > [639661.740235] IP: [] unregister_sysctl_table+0x11/0x70 > [639661.740243] *pdpt = 350e0001 *pde = 00

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-07-05 Thread Andrew
I've got a hangup on other 5.2-rc1 box again: [639661.740225] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 05040214 [639661.740235] IP: [] unregister_sysctl_table+0x11/0x70 [639661.740243] *pdpt = 350e0001 *pde = [639661.740248] Oops: [#1] SMP [639661.740251] Module

[leaf-devel] 5.2-trunk seems to be unstable.

2015-06-27 Thread Andrew
Hi all. I tried to run 5.2 on BRAS servers, and got unexpected behavior - once after some weeks of uptime, kernel interface-related calls (interfaces list, shaper rules creation and so on) becomes uresponsible, so apps that call these apis just hang. Second time, it starts to drop packets. Pos