Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-09-01 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP at 01.09.2011 18:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Besides the structure (where Andrew may have an better response, what needs > to > be done, if we change it), keep in mind that a lot of hardware related > modules > are in initrd - they are still installed if you remove them and save > modu

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-09-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 23:37:35 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Hi Erich; > > ...>> > > >> I would like you to reconsider this decision. > > > > I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but > > pls be ca

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-09-01 Thread Mike Noyes
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:59 +0200, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Folks > > I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked > at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory. > > Is there a reason why we do that? This is so different from any other > Linux di

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-08-31 Thread Andrew
01.09.2011 00:37, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi KP > > on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: >> Hi Erich; >> > ...>> >>> I would like you to reconsider this decision. >> I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but pls be >> carefully removing modules, as they may be needed

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-08-31 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi Erich; > ...>> >> I would like you to reconsider this decision. > > I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but pls be > carefully removing modules, as they may be needed by others running a > different > setup.

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-08-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 08:59:07 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked > at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory. > > Is there a reason why we do that? Up to version 3 it was fill

[leaf-devel] BuC 4.x

2011-08-30 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory. Is there a reason why we do that? This is so different from any other Linux distribution that it is difficult to compare. Some of the modules are