Hi Yves
Am 28.03.2015 um 18:27 schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Sorry for my intrusion but why don't you use a git clone working dir for the
> document root of the http server.
What would that achieve? Isn't is just another repository and thus a
copy of the data?
> With that we can change the tree easi
Sorry for my intrusion but why don't you use a git clone working dir for the
document root of the http server.
With that we can change the tree easily, we need only one branch that represent
all the versions of the packages that can be download.
Also with this the same file in different paths are
Am 27.03.2015 um 19:34 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 17:54:43 schrieb Erich Titl:
Am 27.03.2015 um 16:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:22:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 17:54:43 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 27.03.2015 um 16:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:22:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> >>> Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> ...
> >>
> >
Am 27.03.2015 um 16:43 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:22:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
>>> Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> ...
>>
>>> Yes it's effcient with branches.But it's not really efficient with
>
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:39:54 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi
>
> Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> ...>
>
> > Just play with it and let's know about your findings.
> > Esp stable is a playground, but I hope we can shrink the other repos as
> > well later.
>
> I can now access the
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 16:22:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
> ...
>
> > Yes it's effcient with branches.But it's not really efficient with
> > binaries, though as discussed that's a workaround
Hi
Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
...>
> Just play with it and let's know about your findings.
> Esp stable is a playground, but I hope we can shrink the other repos as well
> later.
I can now access the packages as
http://sourceforge.net/p/leaf/packages/ci/5.1.3/tree/
and
ht
Am 27.03.2015 um 15:53 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
...
>
> Yes it's effcient with branches.But it's not really efficient with binaries,
> though as discussed that's a workaround for the missing ftp/whatever-space.
To git a file is a file is
Am Freitag, 27. März 2015, 09:12:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Folks
>
> Am 24.03.2015 um 12:38 schrieb Erich Titl:
> ..
>
> > I don't know, if we can use this to just give access to the current or
> > stable files. I did some local experiments
> >
> > mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/packages$ du -s
Hi Folks
Am 24.03.2015 um 12:38 schrieb Erich Titl:
..
>
> I don't know, if we can use this to just give access to the current or
> stable files. I did some local experiments
>
> mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/packages$ du -s .
> 5961104 .
>
> mega@leafbuilder:~/leaf/devel/packages$ git branch
Hi Folks
I am playing a little with the package repository, trying to make it
appear to a browser in a reasonable tree form.
I _believe_ by using the git features branches and tags we could provide
a reasonable tree for our packages.
Just looking at the current settings for the packages
https:/
12 matches
Mail list logo
